jinza

jinza — CS2 Stats

AU76561198437470244[U:1:477204516]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,994Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating28,206Top 5% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#299 of 13825 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,103 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjinzaFACEITLevel 9 · 2,103 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER28,206 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning67
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59347Last 10059%Win rateLWWWWWWTLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6
Aggression7.2
Utility5.0
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time593ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 10–13
130Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
135In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A23131057%0.03
mirageA2213959%0.02
ancientA169756%0.01
infernoB136746%0.01
cacheA106460%0.05
anubisS107370%0.01
nukeS54180%0.01
overpass110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

436Matches
55%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
87.8ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6752%1.1517.8
Dust24156%1.3019.1
Anubis2854%1.0717.0
Ancient2850%1.1016.3
Inferno2458%1.4720.1
Nuke1258%1.9117.3
Vertigo650%0.9516.5
Train475%1.2220.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
597msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
60.2%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
8.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8751% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0320%25 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0315%25 Aug
dust213–7-0.0227%24 Aug
cache13–60.1026%24 Aug
dust213–50.0731%24 Aug
dust213–30.0324%24 Aug
mirage13–70.0621%24 Aug
dust212–120.1340%22 Aug
cache6–13-0.0034%22 Aug
mirage15–150.0218%19 Aug
dust213–50.1026%18 Aug
mirage13–90.0236%18 Aug
cache13–90.0340%18 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0038%17 Aug
dust213–160.0432%17 Aug
dust213–20.1231%17 Aug
dust216–140.0528%17 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0216%17 Aug
ancient13–40.0218%16 Aug
mirage11–130.0716%16 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0021%16 Aug
dust215–15-0.0529%16 Aug
overpass13–110.0917%16 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0018%16 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0122%14 Aug
dust27–13-0.0225%14 Aug
mirage15–150.0528%13 Aug
anubis12–160.0818%12 Aug
inferno10–130.2120%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0124%12 Aug
dust213–10-0.0216%11 Aug
mirage17–190.0018%11 Aug
mirage16–120.0720%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0223%10 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0111%9 Aug
mirage22–20-0.0020%8 Aug
mirage13–50.0113%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0424%8 Aug
anubis13–90.0326%8 Aug
dust212–160.0418%7 Aug
mirage3–130.0913%7 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0324%7 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0415%6 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0511%5 Aug
dust213–60.0331%5 Aug
cache13–110.0418%4 Aug
inferno13–50.0124%3 Aug
ancient9–130.0521%3 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0317%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0114%3 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0134%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0329%3 Aug
mirage16–12-0.058%1 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0116%1 Aug
mirage13–30.0915%1 Aug
cache13–20.0822%1 Aug
ancient11–130.0414%1 Aug
inferno9–130.0720%1 Aug
dust213–60.0624%1 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0821%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0523%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0113%31 Jul
cache9–130.0531%31 Jul
nuke13–80.1030%31 Jul
mirage13–110.1322%31 Jul
dust28–13-0.1118%31 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0621%31 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0415%30 Jul
inferno13–90.0416%30 Jul
dust213–40.0536%29 Jul
dust215–150.0221%29 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0621%29 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0135%29 Jul
nuke13–70.0222%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0223%29 Jul
anubis13–50.0325%28 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0221%28 Jul
cache10–130.0430%28 Jul
inferno9–130.0317%28 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0416%28 Jul
ancient13–40.0218%28 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0818%27 Jul
ancient13–110.0226%27 Jul
mirage13–60.0122%27 Jul
cache5–13-0.1220%27 Jul
dust213–110.0526%27 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0322%27 Jul
nuke13–80.0121%27 Jul
dust213–00.1127%27 Jul
anubis13–100.0134%27 Jul
dust213–50.0330%26 Jul
cache16–120.0830%26 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0224%26 Jul
ancient9–130.0420%26 Jul
anubis13–90.1022%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0414%26 Jul
inferno13–30.0314%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0025%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0115%26 Jul
cache13–50.2018%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →