HOWIE P — CS2 Stats

76561198435114900[U:1:474849172]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,361Tracked matches77%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.7 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,099Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#631 of 11232 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning65

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–38–5Last 10057%Win rateLWWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9

Aggression8.1

Utility5.6

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels3.6

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning6.5

Utility5.6

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time585ms−6ms

first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms

Headshot accuracy20.2%+3.0%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — cache 13–10

13–0Biggest win — cache

11Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 43% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	21	9–12	43%	0.03
cache	A	20	12–8	60%	0.03
ancient	A	19	12–7	63%	0.05
mirage	B	13	7–6	54%	0.04
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	0.04
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
dust2	—	4	3–1	75%	0.04
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

133Matches

64%Win rate

1.62Avg K/D

89.6ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

40%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	15	80%	1.47	18.0
Mirage	12	42%	3.05	19.3
Dust2	10	60%	1.38	19.3
Cache	8	88%	1.92	18.5
Inferno	8	88%	1.40	21.5
Ancient	6	83%	1.67	22.2
Nuke	3	67%	1.84	23.3
Vertigo	3	67%	1.67	17.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy

41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.7%Spray accuracy

83.9%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

561msReaction time

39.4%T opening success

49.3%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

3.1%Flash assists

10.44HE damage / grenade

9.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.3892% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	10–13	-0.00	22%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	18%	19 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.06	20%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.07	19%	12 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	20%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	25%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	20%	11 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.13	18%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.10	15%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.04	33%	8 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	0.02	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.06	17%	8 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.06	16%	7 Aug →
nuke	2–0	0.10	25%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.08	26%	7 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.26	22%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.10	19%	5 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	13%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	14%	5 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.01	13%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.00	24%	2 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	20%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.08	33%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	21%	1 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	21%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.16	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	20%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.21	16%	30 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	22%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.07	19%	30 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	26%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	18%	30 Jul →
cache	0–6	-0.08	50%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	24%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.01	26%	27 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	16%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.05	12%	22 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.01	12%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.06	15%	21 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.02	22%	21 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	23%	21 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	12%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.06	11%	16 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.06	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	15%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.05	21%	16 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	13%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.09	13%	15 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	18%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	21%	15 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	17%	15 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.05	27%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	27%	15 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	22%	15 Jul →
nuke	0–6	0.00	29%	14 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.06	18%	14 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.01	25%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.07	11%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.04	18%	14 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.00	19%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.06	9%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.11	31%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	22%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.03	18%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.07	17%	13 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	21%	13 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.06	20%	13 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	31%	13 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.05	26%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	23%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.07	19%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.19	12%	12 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.08	21%	12 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.07	24%	12 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	26%	12 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.06	29%	12 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.03	13%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.03	16%	11 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.03	11%	11 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.05	22%	11 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.10	0%	11 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.02	20%	11 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	18%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.05	13%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	17%	11 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.12	23%	11 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.09	11%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.06	17%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	11%	11 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	9%	11 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	7%	11 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.07	19%	11 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.07	20%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.07	9%	10 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.05	13%	10 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.14	18%	10 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.04	14%	10 Jul →