maxim

maxim — CS2 Stats

76561198429323170[U:1:469057442]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,994Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,440Pink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7050 of 20002 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,440Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,440
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,560 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmaximFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,440 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning59
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT484210Last 10048%Win rateLWWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression8.1
Utility4.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time534ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–7
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB22101245%0.00
cacheS1410471%-0.00
nukeC146843%-0.01
dust2D134931%-0.02
infernoB115645%-0.02
ancientB105550%-0.01
anubisC94544%0.02
office32167%0.01
train21150%0.01
vertigo21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

214Matches
56%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
84.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno7100%1.3619.3
Mirage771%1.0413.0
Ancient540%0.9715.8
Cache450%0.9413.5
Dust2475%0.8012.0
Nuke367%0.8414.3
Anubis2100%1.2017.0
Overpass20%0.7415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
531msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
13.56HE damage / grenade
4.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.8566% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–130.0154%24 Aug
cache13–11-0.0125%23 Aug
cache13–40.0331%23 Aug
mirage13–110.039%18 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0317%18 Aug
inferno3–13-0.087%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0115%17 Aug
train13–60.0331%17 Aug
mirage13–70.1012%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0929%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0110%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0416%16 Aug
anubis13–90.0413%16 Aug
cache13–9-0.0113%16 Aug
train10–13-0.0120%16 Aug
nuke7–13-0.034%10 Aug
mirage15–150.0317%10 Aug
inferno11–13-0.070%10 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0138%10 Aug
dust213–70.0130%9 Aug
nuke10–130.0114%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.036%9 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0813%6 Aug
inferno13–11-0.039%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.087%6 Aug
cache13–6-0.0116%6 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0515%6 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0615%6 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0326%5 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0217%5 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0115%4 Aug
mirage10–130.0214%4 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0218%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0316%4 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0113%4 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0312%4 Aug
mirage13–50.026%4 Aug
nuke13–60.0514%4 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0111%4 Aug
office12–12-0.0018%3 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0114%3 Aug
anubis15–150.0616%2 Aug
cache2–13-0.0522%2 Aug
ancient13–90.0521%2 Aug
anubis13–110.0413%2 Aug
dust213–4-0.0617%2 Aug
vertigo13–60.0410%2 Aug
vertigo12–120.0112%2 Aug
nuke13–100.0224%27 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0611%27 Jul
anubis4–130.0114%27 Jul
cache13–70.0310%23 Jul
nuke10–13-0.058%23 Jul
nuke13–20.0620%22 Jul
cache9–13-0.0511%22 Jul
dust28–130.0012%22 Jul
dust215–15-0.0413%22 Jul
dust210–13-0.0219%22 Jul
ancient13–90.0517%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0515%22 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0226%21 Jul
dust215–15-0.016%21 Jul
dust213–110.0217%20 Jul
anubis8–130.0017%20 Jul
cache13–100.0513%20 Jul
inferno11–130.0019%20 Jul
nuke10–130.0120%17 Jul
dust216–140.0214%17 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0612%17 Jul
inferno13–80.0116%13 Jul
cache13–60.0433%13 Jul
mirage16–120.0311%13 Jul
dust26–13-0.0124%13 Jul
anubis13–50.0530%12 Jul
mirage15–15-0.027%12 Jul
mirage13–00.055%12 Jul
dust25–13-0.0620%12 Jul
cache5–13-0.0517%12 Jul
inferno13–2-0.077%12 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0622%12 Jul
cache13–40.0327%12 Jul
anubis16–140.0214%12 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0520%12 Jul
nuke13–100.0324%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0424%9 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0713%9 Jul
cache13–20.0412%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0218%8 Jul
inferno8–130.0726%8 Jul
office13–50.0221%8 Jul
office13–40.0324%8 Jul
mirage13–80.0513%8 Jul
ancient13–70.0223%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0220%2 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0316%2 Jul
cache13–5-0.0214%2 Jul
cache12–12-0.0314%2 Jul
nuke13–7-0.028%22 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0611%22 Jun
ancient8–130.0613%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →