Søren Hat

Søren Hat — CS2 Stats

76561198416794745[U:1:456529017]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,550Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,450Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69874 of 231381 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 19 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,450 +2,741 20 May13 Sept · 29 days played
17,61921,893peak 21,89320 May13 Sept
21,893Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-05-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,443 below peak (21,893)
  • -704 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,469 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,550 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSøren HatFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,450 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning56
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateWLWLWWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility4.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.6
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time526ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 9–13 · dust2, 15 Jun
31%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 25 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2291341%-0.01
ancientA1810856%-0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
anubisC114736%-0.03
mirageC94544%-0.03
dust2D93633%-0.02
vertigoC52340%0.00
cacheA53260%-0.04
overpass41325%-0.01
warden110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

145Matches
50%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
64.1ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3247%0.8612.5
Nuke2568%1.3314.7
Inferno2259%0.8612.4
Anubis2143%0.7512.1
Dust21527%0.8112.1
Mirage1338%0.7311.6
Vertigo450%1.0614.5
Train333%0.447.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
522msReaction time
31.4%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
9.85HE damage / grenade
3.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.5727 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.3757% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–6-0.0114%14 Sept
nuke12–160.0325%13 Sept
ancient13–110.0117%13 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0718%13 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0429%12 Sept
inferno13–50.0124%12 Sept
dust215–15-0.0821%12 Sept
ancient13–60.0318%12 Sept
nuke10–13-0.085%11 Sept
dust27–13-0.0710%11 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0112%11 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0614%9 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0718%8 Sept
ancient13–50.0417%5 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0216%4 Sept
anubis6–130.0716%4 Sept
nuke13–00.0825%4 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0425%3 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0121%3 Sept
inferno13–90.0126%1 Sept
dust24–13-0.0621%1 Sept
ancient6–13-0.037%29 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0117%28 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0111%28 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0216%28 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0117%27 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0411%27 Aug
cache6–13-0.1014%19 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0710%17 Aug
nuke23–25-0.0223%16 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1011%14 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0512%12 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0430%12 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0410%11 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0416%6 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0614%6 Aug
dust213–40.0311%6 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0616%30 Jul
mirage4–13-0.039%30 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0422%30 Jul
nuke13–40.0523%21 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0422%21 Jul
dust27–13-0.076%21 Jul
inferno13–20.0524%21 Jul
ancient13–80.0116%21 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0816%17 Jul
cache9–13-0.1110%17 Jul
cache13–90.0122%17 Jul
nuke7–130.0510%16 Jul
cache16–13-0.067%12 Jul
inferno4–13-0.109%11 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0222%25 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0331%25 Jun
inferno13–110.0210%25 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0422%25 Jun
ancient13–110.0519%21 Jun
nuke6–130.0110%20 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0711%20 Jun
mirage4–130.009%20 Jun
inferno13–100.019%19 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0312%18 Jun
dust213–90.0121%18 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0414%16 Jun
dust29–130.0918%15 Jun
overpass16–12-0.0413%15 Jun
inferno10–130.014%15 Jun
dust211–13-0.0213%12 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0310%11 Jun
anubis14–160.017%11 Jun
mirage13–100.0411%11 Jun
inferno13–10-0.048%6 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0310%4 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0711%4 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0919%4 Jun
vertigo13–50.0519%4 Jun
cache13–00.0826%4 Jun
warden13–5-0.018%4 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0110%4 Jun
overpass8–130.0117%4 Jun
ancient9–2-0.025%4 Jun
inferno8–130.027%28 May
vertigo3–13-0.048%28 May
anubis13–6-0.0511%28 May
ancient8–13-0.024%28 May
nuke13–70.0812%28 May
nuke13–7-0.0412%27 May
ancient15–15-0.039%25 May
dust213–60.0119%25 May
overpass9–130.0016%24 May
ancient13–40.0217%24 May
overpass10–13-0.0324%24 May
ancient9–130.0014%24 May
inferno13–110.0518%24 May
ancient9–13-0.0313%24 May
vertigo13–110.0316%20 May
nuke13–40.0611%20 May
ancient13–30.0315%20 May
nuke12–12-0.0310%20 May
vertigo3–13-0.0217%20 May
mirage3–13-0.0313%19 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →