Sanders

Sanders — CS2 Stats

FI76561198416718992[U:1:456453264]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

128Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 128 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

42Days played since 2021-02-10

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSandersFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning38
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 700ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility6.6
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels1.6

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning3.8
Utility6.6
Mechanics9.2
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time640ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 635ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 21 Oct →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · ancient, 1 Mar →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · nuke, 2 Oct →
16–3Biggest win · mirage, 12 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
38Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD186–1233%-0.00
infernoB168–850%0.00
dust2C145–936%-0.01
nukeA138–562%0.01
ancientB137–654%-0.03
vertigoC94–544%-0.06
anubisS75–271%-0.01
overpassA53–260%0.01
train—21–150%0.00
dogtown—10–10%-0.18
jura—10–10%0.05
brewery—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches
51%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
—ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
91.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
614msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
6.12HE damage / grenade
5.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4761% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo4–9-0.1231%25 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.167%25 Jun →
dust213–90.0323%25 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0718%24 Jun →
mirage2–10-0.0540%20 Jun →
inferno7–9-0.0923%19 Jun →
anubis13–11-0.099%19 Jun →
mirage3–13-0.0817%14 Jun →
nuke7–90.0844%8 Jun →
inferno5–90.0238%8 Jun →
dogtown4–9-0.1845%8 Jun →
vertigo9–1-0.0425%8 Jun →
jura12–120.0528%2 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.1025%2 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0419%1 Jun →
brewery6–9-0.0626%1 Jun →
inferno7–9-0.0221%1 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0218%1 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0521%21 Oct →
mirage13–30.1719%21 Oct →
overpass13–70.1216%20 Oct →
mirage13–40.0816%20 Oct →
dust213–40.0732%20 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0119%20 Oct →
vertigo13–7-0.1111%20 Oct →
anubis8–00.0532%20 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0210%19 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0212%19 Oct →
ancient13–40.0016%8 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0219%8 Oct →
overpass13–4-0.048%8 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0219%2 Oct →
dust213–10.0129%2 Oct →
anubis13–40.0820%2 Oct →
anubis13–40.0719%2 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0315%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0627%30 Sept →
nuke13–40.0732%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0113%30 Sept →
anubis10–6-0.0319%30 Sept →
nuke13–100.0232%30 Sept →
inferno13–30.0630%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0116%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.1627%29 Sept →
nuke12–120.1020%29 Sept →
ancient6–130.0426%29 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0115%19 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0123%19 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0523%19 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0331%19 Sept →
nuke13–70.0813%19 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0224%17 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0636%17 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0627%17 Sept →
ancient6–9-0.0856%1 Mar →
dust211–16-0.109%1 Mar →
inferno9–00.0320%1 Mar →
mirage8–8-0.0612%1 Mar →
vertigo16–5-0.0514%1 Mar →
inferno9–40.1214%21 Feb →
mirage14–16-0.0513%9 Feb →
inferno16–19-0.0420%6 Feb →
inferno16–14-0.0711%1 Feb →
ancient16–100.0213%31 Jan →
ancient16–100.0111%11 Jan →
vertigo5–16-0.0819%19 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0117%19 Aug →
mirage16–11-0.0324%19 Aug →
dust23–9-0.0325%5 Aug →
ancient3–9-0.0715%5 Aug →
dust24–90.0133%5 Aug →
mirage4–16-0.0128%22 Dec →
vertigo8–16-0.0624%22 Dec →
overpass16–8-0.0121%17 Nov →
vertigo7–16-0.0522%16 Nov →
inferno16–80.0235%16 Nov →
mirage7–90.0631%14 Nov →
ancient4–16-0.0516%14 Nov →
mirage16–19-0.0432%17 Sept →
dust25–16-0.0538%12 Sept →
overpass14–16-0.0219%12 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0111%11 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0215%11 Sept →
inferno16–11-0.0525%11 Sept →
vertigo16–140.0031%19 May →
inferno11–160.0018%19 May →
mirage15–150.0032%19 May →
mirage16–130.0025%26 Apr →
vertigo9–160.0023%26 Apr →
mirage16–80.0028%25 Apr →
dust21–130.009%13 Mar →
mirage16–30.0011%12 Mar →
mirage6–160.0023%11 Mar →
nuke14–160.0014%21 Feb →
mirage9–160.0023%21 Feb →
overpass3–160.008%21 Feb →
dust28–160.0017%20 Feb →
inferno16–120.0019%20 Feb →
train16–90.0021%10 Feb →
train14–160.0018%10 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.