october

october — CS2 Stats

76561198412171910[U:1:451906182]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,061Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21048 of 252734 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,362 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 -1,590 28 Aug – 17 Oct · 18 days played
24,87727,084peak 27,08428 Aug17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,362 +0 28 Aug – 16 Sept · 5 observations
1,3621,362peak 1,36228 Aug16 Sept
27,235Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,362Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,362
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 169 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,084 below peak (27,084)
  • -460 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoctoberFACEITLevel 8 · 1,362 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,362csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning46
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36–54–10Last 10036%Win rateLLWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Last 20

  • 5–15 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.3
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time578ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 8 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 5–9 · inferno, 3 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 22 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 2 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 53% over 19anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD226–1627%-0.02
nukeB1910–953%-0.02
cacheC125–742%-0.02
ancientD123–925%-0.03
vertigoC94–544%-0.03
dust2D62–433%-0.03
anubisD61–517%-0.04
mirageD51–420%-0.03
train—31–233%-0.01
overpass—32–167%-0.03
italy—21–150%-0.01
office—10–10%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

244Matches
54%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
85.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3187%1.0715.3
Mirage2259%1.2517.4
Ancient2264%0.9615.9
Inferno1741%0.9113.4
Dust21464%1.1618.1
Anubis1354%1.2019.4
Overpass838%0.9814.1
Cache862%0.9713.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
574msReaction time
42.3%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
5.54HE damage / grenade
12.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0425%17 Oct →
office9–130.0733%17 Oct →
cache13–30.0220%17 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0114%17 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0433%17 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0523%17 Oct →
nuke7–130.0024%16 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0519%16 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0019%16 Oct →
vertigo2–130.0025%13 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0821%8 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0028%8 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0425%8 Oct →
train8–13-0.0427%4 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0217%4 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0710%4 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.0327%3 Oct →
overpass3–13-0.0519%3 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0640%3 Oct →
italy10–13-0.0222%3 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.140%3 Oct →
train13–5-0.0129%3 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0817%3 Oct →
cache13–40.0218%3 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0214%3 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0621%3 Oct →
ancient14–160.0618%3 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0521%3 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0423%2 Oct →
vertigo4–13-0.0127%2 Oct →
train12–120.0229%2 Oct →
overpass13–11-0.0514%2 Oct →
italy13–6-0.0125%2 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0417%2 Oct →
inferno12–120.0425%2 Oct →
cache9–30.0518%2 Oct →
nuke5–130.0225%2 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1220%1 Oct →
nuke13–40.0927%1 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0314%29 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0428%29 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0222%29 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0918%26 Sept →
nuke13–70.0313%26 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0331%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.0126%23 Sept →
inferno13–100.0217%23 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0013%22 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0718%20 Sept →
vertigo13–60.0030%20 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0318%20 Sept →
inferno9–4-0.0720%19 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0224%19 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0518%18 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0516%18 Sept →
vertigo8–8-0.0917%18 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.1012%18 Sept →
ancient5–00.0120%18 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0614%17 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0026%17 Sept →
inferno0–3-0.090%16 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0532%16 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0318%16 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0116%16 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.0516%15 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0115%15 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0222%15 Sept →
nuke13–80.0824%14 Sept →
inferno13–80.0221%14 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0320%14 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0332%13 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0325%12 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0215%11 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0432%11 Sept →
cache13–80.0216%10 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0517%9 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0131%9 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0621%9 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0510%9 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0031%9 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0531%8 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.1123%8 Sept →
inferno9–30.1826%8 Sept →
overpass13–20.0113%8 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0420%8 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0714%8 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0013%5 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0242%5 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1120%5 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0234%4 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0828%4 Sept →
vertigo13–4-0.0322%4 Sept →
anubis1–130.0217%4 Sept →
mirage2–130.0118%4 Sept →
nuke13–70.0115%4 Sept →
inferno8–80.0133%4 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0019%3 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0645%3 Sept →
inferno8–80.0032%3 Sept →
dust213–00.0721%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.