Näätä

Näätä — CS2 Stats

76561198404414832[U:1:444149104]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

684Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating19,511Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#84028 of 233100 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 20 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,511 +2,086 20 Jul20 Sept · 31 days played
17,42522,637peak 22,63720 Jul20 Sept
23,006Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-07-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,126 below peak (22,637)
  • -2,087 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 489 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNäätäPREMIER19,511 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning31
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateWWLWLTWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 697ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 6122 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim3.9
Utility5.4
Positioning3.1
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 58% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning3.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics1.9
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time619ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 21 Jul
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · cache, 27 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 4 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 15 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 43% over 37
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C37162143%-0.03
ancientA1811761%-0.02
mirageA169756%-0.03
cacheS128467%-0.04
anubisC73443%-0.04
nukeC73443%-0.02
inferno330100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
58.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
614msReaction time
15.7%T opening success
35.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
6.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.6844% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0116%18 Sept
dust213–8-0.0118%18 Sept
cache1–13-0.0929%12 Sept
dust213–50.0117%12 Sept
mirage8–130.0321%4 Sept
dust215–15-0.0419%4 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0517%4 Sept
mirage9–13-0.039%4 Sept
dust21–13-0.0215%4 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0914%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0628%29 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0217%29 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0122%28 Aug
dust21–9-0.095%22 Aug
dust25–130.0118%22 Aug
dust212–12-0.0521%21 Aug
ancient11–13-0.049%21 Aug
dust213–40.037%21 Aug
dust22–4-0.0114%15 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0011%15 Aug
dust213–20.0426%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0411%15 Aug
cache15–15-0.0514%14 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0119%14 Aug
nuke6–40.0133%7 Aug
ancient13–40.0521%7 Aug
dust213–110.009%4 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0013%3 Aug
dust213–40.0121%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0617%3 Aug
cache16–14-0.0223%2 Aug
dust213–16-0.039%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0215%1 Aug
cache13–6-0.0313%1 Aug
mirage1–8-0.1120%1 Aug
ancient13–20.0221%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0711%31 Jul
anubis10–130.019%31 Jul
anubis1–13-0.080%31 Jul
cache16–14-0.0221%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0611%31 Jul
dust213–10-0.055%30 Jul
mirage7–13-0.038%30 Jul
cache6–13-0.048%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.029%30 Jul
ancient13–80.039%30 Jul
dust213–9-0.0220%30 Jul
dust213–9-0.058%30 Jul
cache16–14-0.0410%30 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0713%30 Jul
ancient13–90.0023%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.027%30 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0515%30 Jul
dust29–130.0013%30 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0110%30 Jul
cache7–130.0422%30 Jul
dust213–50.0315%29 Jul
dust213–11-0.0416%29 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0512%29 Jul
dust213–7-0.0219%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0318%29 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0416%29 Jul
cache13–4-0.0929%29 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0614%28 Jul
dust29–13-0.0513%28 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0823%27 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0019%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0317%27 Jul
dust213–16-0.0711%27 Jul
cache13–10-0.0536%27 Jul
dust25–13-0.0027%26 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0415%26 Jul
mirage13–8-0.046%25 Jul
inferno13–6-0.027%25 Jul
ancient13–9-0.047%25 Jul
dust213–6-0.0910%25 Jul
anubis13–70.0117%24 Jul
dust216–13-0.0010%24 Jul
mirage16–12-0.049%23 Jul
ancient13–7-0.038%23 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0419%23 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0517%23 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0128%23 Jul
nuke13–4-0.008%23 Jul
cache13–10-0.0513%23 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0318%23 Jul
mirage13–9-0.015%23 Jul
anubis13–30.015%23 Jul
dust213–6-0.0210%22 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0016%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0417%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0711%22 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0422%22 Jul
dust213–9-0.0126%22 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0729%22 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0526%21 Jul
mirage13–70.0611%21 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0522%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0414%20 Jul
mirage13–50.0116%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →