squirb

squirb — CS2 Stats

US76561198403249377[U:1:442983649]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

7,267Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,360Top 10% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17754 of 251924 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,070 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,360 -946 28 Aug – 23 Sept · 7 days played
25,36026,306peak 26,30628 Aug23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,070 +0 28 Aug – 20 Sept · 6 observations
2,0702,070peak 2,07028 Aug20 Sept
26,306Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,070Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,070
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 430 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 946 below peak (26,306)
  • -946 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,640 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsquirbFACEITLevel 10 · 2,070 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,360 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,070csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning62
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +7.0pp headshot accuracy · +51ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility5.6
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 70% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time547ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 515ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 22 Sept →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 1 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
10–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 26infernoWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS2618–869%0.01
dust2C229–1341%-0.00
mirageA169–756%0.01
cacheB105–550%-0.01
nukeA95–456%0.02
infernoD91–811%-0.02
ancientB84–450%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,136Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
80.5ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage74749%1.0916.1
Dust248548%1.0515.5
Anubis39551%1.1217.0
Ancient32048%1.0516.6
Inferno24951%1.0515.8
Nuke21253%1.2017.6
Vertigo18459%1.2017.0
Overpass12352%1.0916.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.9%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
538msReaction time
69.9%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
10.13HE damage / grenade
6.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.9103% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–13-0.0229%12 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0143%12 Oct →
mirage16–120.0142%4 Oct →
dust213–70.1125%4 Oct →
dust216–130.0119%4 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0431%4 Oct →
nuke13–50.0155%1 Oct →
ancient9–130.0135%1 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0127%29 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.1433%29 Sept →
mirage13–60.0728%29 Sept →
ancient13–40.0336%27 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0226%27 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0123%27 Sept →
dust28–130.0218%26 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0141%25 Sept →
anubis13–80.0522%24 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0428%24 Sept →
anubis19–17-0.0429%23 Sept →
cache8–130.0219%23 Sept →
inferno8–130.0123%23 Sept →
dust213–50.0732%23 Sept →
anubis13–70.0212%23 Sept →
dust213–100.0122%22 Sept →
anubis13–60.0032%22 Sept →
anubis16–140.0334%22 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0422%22 Sept →
anubis13–70.1333%22 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0322%22 Sept →
anubis13–50.0929%20 Sept →
mirage13–40.0426%20 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0341%20 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.049%19 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0621%19 Sept →
anubis13–100.0527%19 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0127%19 Sept →
mirage19–150.0033%19 Sept →
mirage13–60.0224%19 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0130%18 Sept →
mirage6–130.0836%18 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0533%18 Sept →
mirage13–100.0525%18 Sept →
mirage8–130.0516%18 Sept →
nuke13–70.1025%18 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0112%18 Sept →
dust210–130.0528%18 Sept →
nuke13–50.0736%18 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0331%17 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0520%17 Sept →
ancient13–90.1140%17 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0416%17 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0031%17 Sept →
dust213–110.0038%17 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0150%17 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0733%16 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0516%16 Sept →
dust25–130.0021%16 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0131%16 Sept →
nuke16–190.0125%16 Sept →
dust213–100.0425%15 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0029%15 Sept →
dust213–30.1131%15 Sept →
anubis13–60.0527%15 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0516%15 Sept →
mirage9–130.0824%14 Sept →
ancient7–130.0635%14 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0224%14 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0026%13 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0244%13 Sept →
nuke13–100.0233%13 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0125%13 Sept →
ancient13–60.0928%13 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0213%13 Sept →
anubis13–90.1029%12 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0430%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0325%12 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0426%12 Sept →
ancient13–110.0229%11 Sept →
nuke11–130.0018%11 Sept →
inferno0–7-0.030%11 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0121%11 Sept →
nuke6–130.0420%11 Sept →
anubis13–110.0730%11 Sept →
cache13–110.0428%11 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0526%11 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0545%10 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0110%10 Sept →
anubis13–40.0520%10 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0726%9 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0525%9 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0323%9 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0428%9 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0333%8 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0421%8 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0330%8 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0422%8 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0021%7 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0114%7 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0646%7 Sept →
mirage13–00.0538%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.