Clitten Mittens

Clitten Mittens — CS2 Stats

76561198401225621[U:1:440959893]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,304Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,214Top 50% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#85781 of 227970 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1072Premier CS Rating · 18,142 → 19,214
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 19 days played since 12 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,214 -1,543 12 Aug19 Sept · 20 days played
17,02620,757peak 20,75712 Aug19 Sept
21,294Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-08-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,543 below peak (20,757)
  • -682 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 786 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGClitten MittensFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER19,214 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning70
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48484Last 10048%Win rateWWWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.3
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning7.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels7.1
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time577ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 13 Sept
45%Best headshot accuracy · 1–8 · dust2, 12 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 13 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 7 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC24101442%0.01
dust2D2271532%0.00
ancientA1810856%0.01
cacheS128467%-0.01
anubisA127558%-0.01
mirageS75271%0.01
infernoD51420%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

38Matches
39%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
65.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1020%0.7412.4
Mirage650%0.6810.2
Dust2667%0.8612.0
Nuke367%0.9511.3
Ancient333%0.7413.3
Inferno333%0.7915.7
Train20%0.407.0
Cache1100%0.7110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
575msReaction time
59.8%T opening success
57.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.03HE damage / grenade
3.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3806 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0412%19 Sept
nuke13–40.0523%19 Sept
cache13–8-0.0335%19 Sept
ancient13–90.0411%18 Sept
anubis9–3-0.0210%18 Sept
ancient6–13-0.039%18 Sept
dust24–13-0.0310%18 Sept
cache13–10-0.048%18 Sept
cache16–12-0.0411%16 Sept
dust213–100.0622%16 Sept
nuke1–13-0.0619%16 Sept
ancient13–50.0115%16 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0016%15 Sept
dust214–16-0.0117%15 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0419%13 Sept
ancient13–70.1617%13 Sept
mirage13–100.0715%13 Sept
cache11–130.0211%13 Sept
dust29–130.0024%13 Sept
nuke14–16-0.0321%13 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0018%13 Sept
nuke3–13-0.097%13 Sept
dust213–100.0615%13 Sept
ancient8–13-0.017%12 Sept
nuke13–30.1019%12 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0218%12 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0115%12 Sept
anubis13–110.0111%12 Sept
dust27–13-0.0422%12 Sept
nuke13–40.0415%12 Sept
nuke10–130.0314%12 Sept
anubis13–80.0340%9 Sept
nuke13–80.0219%9 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0615%7 Sept
nuke13–10.009%7 Sept
ancient13–40.0625%7 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0014%7 Sept
mirage13–90.0613%7 Sept
dust29–130.0218%7 Sept
ancient15–150.009%7 Sept
nuke15–150.0519%7 Sept
ancient10–130.0611%6 Sept
nuke13–100.0920%6 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0511%6 Sept
dust213–30.0513%6 Sept
dust213–60.0324%6 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0213%6 Sept
cache11–13-0.0218%6 Sept
inferno5–130.0128%5 Sept
nuke13–50.0216%5 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0220%5 Sept
anubis6–130.0120%5 Sept
dust29–130.0417%5 Sept
mirage13–70.0224%5 Sept
cache6–13-0.0814%5 Sept
cache13–100.0014%5 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0137%5 Sept
nuke10–130.0115%5 Sept
dust25–13-0.0610%4 Sept
dust213–100.0218%4 Sept
ancient16–120.0114%4 Sept
dust213–6-0.029%4 Sept
nuke10–00.1518%4 Sept
dust212–16-0.039%4 Sept
cache13–110.0111%3 Sept
anubis13–30.0522%3 Sept
dust26–13-0.0714%3 Sept
dust29–130.0518%3 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0311%2 Sept
cache13–100.0916%2 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0010%2 Sept
cache13–80.0014%2 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0115%2 Sept
nuke13–100.0217%2 Sept
dust28–13-0.0414%31 Aug
dust213–5-0.036%31 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0221%30 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0510%29 Aug
dust210–130.0118%29 Aug
dust28–130.0214%29 Aug
ancient13–100.0314%29 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0111%29 Aug
cache13–11-0.0021%29 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0413%28 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0010%28 Aug
nuke13–9-0.057%28 Aug
inferno13–20.018%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0717%28 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0013%13 Aug
cache10–130.0126%13 Aug
ancient13–6-0.049%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0418%13 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0521%13 Aug
dust28–130.0316%13 Aug
nuke15–150.0525%12 Aug
dust21–8-0.0245%12 Aug
ancient13–30.0410%12 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0614%12 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0320%12 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0213%12 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →