르으으으으음

르으으으으음 — CS2 Stats

76561198400517343[U:1:440251615]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,269Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,189Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,382Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5069 of 261516 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,382 +808 11 Oct – 31 Oct · 6 days played
26,57427,841peak 27,84111 Oct31 Oct
27,841Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,105Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-01-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 459 below peak (27,841)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,618 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate55.9%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy8.3%12.0%12.4%4.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.021.03above
Match win rate55.2%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG르으으으으음FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER27,382 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,105csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning48
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–39–7Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.8
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time542ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · dust2, 20 Jun →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 20 Jan →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 10 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 19 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 27cacheWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3116–1552%0.02
dust2S2718–967%0.01
ancientC167–944%0.01
cacheD93–633%0.01
nukeA85–363%-0.01
inferno—42–250%-0.01
anubis—32–167%0.01
train—10–10%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

61,995Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
3,166Matches
55.2%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players
55.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
8.3%Shot accuracy
6,227MVPs
1,189Hours (in match)
4,209Bombs planted
690Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

10,485dust2
2,487inferno
1,008vertigo
925nuke
416train
152office
62italy
26cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
54%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
78.4ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2838%1.2317.9
Mirage667%1.1114.8
Ancient367%1.4826.0
Vertigo333%0.499.7
Inferno250%0.7110.0
Nuke250%0.769.0
Train1100%1.1218.0
Anubis1100%1.7124.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
543msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
10.34HE damage / grenade
4.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4648 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0334% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0421%31 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0316%24 Oct →
dust213–100.0124%22 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0615%22 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0518%22 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0435%22 Oct →
ancient12–120.0129%22 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0821%21 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0218%21 Oct →
mirage13–40.0827%21 Oct →
dust213–30.0421%21 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0314%21 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0720%21 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0418%16 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0518%14 Oct →
dust213–20.0117%14 Oct →
dust213–20.0532%14 Oct →
ancient13–50.0318%14 Oct →
cache13–60.0324%14 Oct →
ancient13–110.0319%11 Oct →
dust213–50.0627%11 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0511%10 Oct →
mirage13–60.0919%10 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0724%10 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0027%10 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0716%10 Oct →
mirage13–100.0214%10 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0416%8 Oct →
cache8–130.0013%8 Oct →
anubis13–30.1016%8 Oct →
inferno16–130.0412%4 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0621%22 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0212%22 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0119%22 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0216%22 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0517%22 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0125%26 Jun →
dust213–90.1224%20 Jun →
mirage9–130.0216%6 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0223%6 Jun →
mirage11–130.0830%6 Jun →
dust24–130.0720%6 Jun →
cache13–90.0326%6 Jun →
nuke13–20.0214%10 May →
cache9–130.0214%10 May →
mirage6–130.0011%10 May →
cache8–13-0.0017%10 May →
cache8–130.0216%5 May →
nuke11–13-0.0514%5 May →
cache8–130.0520%5 May →
dust211–130.0214%5 May →
mirage11–13-0.0029%22 Apr →
train1–13-0.0336%22 Apr →
ancient13–40.0025%22 Apr →
ancient15–150.1029%22 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0430%22 Apr →
mirage13–80.0417%20 Apr →
dust25–130.0233%19 Apr →
mirage13–50.0617%19 Apr →
dust213–10.0324%19 Apr →
ancient13–50.0823%19 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0720%19 Apr →
inferno13–60.0316%19 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0029%19 Apr →
mirage12–120.0722%19 Apr →
mirage11–130.0329%19 Apr →
dust213–20.0810%17 Apr →
mirage13–40.1223%16 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0119%16 Apr →
dust213–100.0126%16 Apr →
ancient13–60.0725%16 Apr →
mirage13–10.0821%16 Apr →
mirage13–80.0830%16 Apr →
anubis13–40.0227%12 Mar →
dust213–100.0220%12 Mar →
mirage12–12-0.0326%12 Mar →
overpass13–5-0.0618%12 Mar →
mirage8–130.0114%7 Mar →
dust213–60.0112%7 Mar →
mirage13–50.0117%7 Mar →
nuke13–10-0.0020%7 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0213%5 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0226%5 Mar →
nuke13–4-0.0520%5 Mar →
ancient12–12-0.0411%5 Mar →
dust212–12-0.0322%11 Feb →
dust213–110.0521%9 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0116%9 Feb →
mirage13–110.0227%9 Feb →
dust213–50.0227%8 Feb →
anubis2–13-0.0930%7 Feb →
mirage11–130.0621%7 Feb →
ancient4–130.0827%7 Feb →
dust213–80.0214%7 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0118%21 Jan →
mirage10–130.0932%21 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0814%21 Jan →
nuke13–40.0842%20 Jan →
ancient13–10.0120%20 Jan →
mirage13–4-0.0127%20 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.