✪PR3MED

✪PR3MED — CS2 Stats

AU76561198394055753[U:1:433790025]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

587Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,485Blue band · top ~31.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 1,071 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+425Premier CS Rating · 14,060 → 14,485
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 15 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,485 +6,206 15 Aug17 Sept · 28 days played
7,83614,485peak 14,48515 Aug17 Sept
14,654Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,071Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,071
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 130 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,485
  • +6,276 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 515 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪PR3MEDFACEITLevel 3 · 1,071 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,485 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,071csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning61
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60355Last 10060%Win rateWLWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +5.7pp headshot accuracy · +77ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility5.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch1.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning6.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time568ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy11.7%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 11.3% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 15 Aug
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 17 Sept
430msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · mirage, 8 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 17 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 82% over 11ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB20101050%0.01
nukeA1912763%-0.00
infernoA1610663%-0.00
dust2A148657%0.00
cacheS119282%0.01
anubisS118373%0.00
ancientC83538%-0.02
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

381Matches
50%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
79.8ADR
27%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3471%1.0114.7
Ancient1547%0.9414.1
Anubis1040%0.7813.6
Inferno944%1.1417.9
Nuke757%0.9416.6
Dust2729%1.0718.1
Vertigo2100%2.1623.0
Cache1100%2.8823.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
60.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
566msReaction time
54.1%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
9.32HE damage / grenade
10.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.927% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–0-0.0016%17 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0131%17 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0433%17 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0415%17 Sept
nuke13–80.0412%15 Sept
inferno11–13-0.077%14 Sept
cache13–80.0125%13 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0010%13 Sept
vertigo11–130.0219%13 Sept
anubis4–13-0.019%13 Sept
inferno13–70.0410%13 Sept
cache13–0-0.023%13 Sept
anubis16–120.0114%13 Sept
anubis13–110.0814%12 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0011%11 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0518%11 Sept
dust27–13-0.046%10 Sept
nuke13–11-0.009%10 Sept
anubis13–30.0521%10 Sept
dust28–130.019%9 Sept
inferno13–30.069%9 Sept
dust213–70.058%9 Sept
ancient13–8-0.030%9 Sept
nuke15–150.025%8 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0410%8 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0711%8 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0510%7 Sept
mirage13–100.012%7 Sept
nuke15–15-0.026%7 Sept
anubis13–5-0.038%7 Sept
inferno13–80.079%7 Sept
mirage6–13-0.028%7 Sept
dust25–13-0.007%7 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0720%6 Sept
inferno11–130.0115%6 Sept
nuke13–80.0430%6 Sept
nuke13–20.0411%6 Sept
ancient13–8-0.017%6 Sept
cache5–13-0.038%6 Sept
cache13–70.0112%6 Sept
ancient3–13-0.045%5 Sept
cache13–8-0.0723%5 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0418%5 Sept
dust215–15-0.0613%5 Sept
mirage13–80.0212%5 Sept
dust213–70.0113%5 Sept
ancient14–160.028%4 Sept
dust213–2-0.023%4 Sept
inferno13–80.0513%4 Sept
nuke9–130.0313%4 Sept
ancient10–13-0.038%4 Sept
anubis15–15-0.026%3 Sept
mirage13–110.0314%3 Sept
cache13–100.000%3 Sept
anubis13–30.077%3 Sept
inferno3–13-0.068%3 Sept
nuke13–7-0.033%3 Sept
ancient9–13-0.049%2 Sept
dust213–90.0816%1 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0224%1 Sept
dust213–70.0414%1 Sept
cache13–70.099%1 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0212%1 Sept
mirage13–100.0510%31 Aug
inferno13–70.0316%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0119%28 Aug
nuke13–90.0415%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0213%27 Aug
cache11–130.0813%27 Aug
mirage13–50.0818%26 Aug
dust214–16-0.0113%26 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0612%26 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0111%26 Aug
dust213–10-0.0315%25 Aug
cache13–70.035%24 Aug
nuke13–110.0722%22 Aug
anubis13–7-0.083%21 Aug
mirage13–40.0511%21 Aug
inferno13–50.0513%21 Aug
dust213–9-0.008%21 Aug
mirage11–130.0312%21 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0410%21 Aug
mirage13–90.1115%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.086%21 Aug
inferno13–4-0.048%21 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0921%21 Aug
mirage16–140.0224%20 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0415%20 Aug
mirage4–130.008%20 Aug
cache13–60.003%20 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0314%19 Aug
cache13–100.016%17 Aug
dust213–90.089%17 Aug
nuke2–13-0.074%17 Aug
anubis10–130.0415%17 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0613%15 Aug
nuke13–60.146%15 Aug
anubis13–3-0.077%15 Aug
anubis13–6-0.005%15 Aug
inferno13–100.0015%15 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →