gBuDeLo

gBuDeLo — CS2 Stats

FR76561198386659505[U:1:426393777]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

851Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#32903 of 239231 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,319 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 13 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,703 +6,180 14 Feb15 Jun · 26 days played
17,52324,077peak 24,07714 Feb15 Jun
24,077Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,319Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-02-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,319
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgBuDeLoFACEITLevel 5 · 1,319 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,319csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning41
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51463Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility3.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.1
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time610ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+5.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 2–0 · dust2, 10 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · inferno, 24 Aug
281msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · dust2, 10 Jun
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 19 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA1710759%-0.02
infernoC1661038%-0.02
dust2S139469%-0.00
mirageC125742%-0.02
ancientS128467%-0.01
anubisD93633%-0.02
overpassA85363%-0.03
nukeB84450%0.02
vertigo21150%-0.01
poseidon1010%0.04
alpine1010%-0.00
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

140Matches
57%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
70.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23348%0.9513.4
Inferno2955%0.9614.1
Nuke1861%0.9713.4
Ancient1759%0.9814.1
Anubis1323%0.7712.1
Cache1191%0.8915.7
Mirage757%0.7211.0
Vertigo580%0.9816.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
621msReaction time
18.7%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
3.87HE damage / grenade
5.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4809 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.6756% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–11-0.0414%18 Sept
mirage13–30.0230%15 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0412%7 Sept
cache13–9-0.0924%30 Aug
dust213–7-0.0114%27 Aug
anubis1–12-0.0322%25 Aug
mirage3–1-0.0233%25 Aug
cache7–13-0.0627%24 Aug
inferno4–1-0.0450%24 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0322%20 Jul
cache19–170.0219%28 Jun
cache13–11-0.0229%15 Jun
cache13–40.0311%15 Jun
cache13–30.0224%15 Jun
poseidon7–90.0413%15 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0029%15 Jun
dust26–13-0.0320%15 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0330%14 Jun
dust28–13-0.0417%14 Jun
dust214–16-0.0523%14 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0329%12 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0221%12 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0430%12 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0118%10 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0424%10 Jun
inferno7–13-0.138%10 Jun
dust29–13-0.0131%10 Jun
dust22–00.1150%10 Jun
anubis4–130.0127%9 Jun
dust213–3-0.0521%9 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0225%9 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0922%9 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0133%8 Jun
overpass7–13-0.1132%5 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0117%2 Jun
ancient12–160.0123%1 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0322%1 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0613%1 Jun
nuke5–130.0232%1 Jun
overpass13–40.0030%1 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0313%22 May
ancient13–8-0.0315%22 May
nuke16–130.0313%21 May
mirage3–130.0314%21 May
overpass13–5-0.0129%21 May
dust28–10.0116%21 May
inferno3–13-0.0219%20 May
overpass13–2-0.0314%20 May
ancient12–120.0126%20 May
anubis7–130.0127%19 May
nuke6–10.1038%19 May
mirage13–1-0.0415%19 May
cache11–13-0.0433%19 May
anubis13–9-0.1111%18 May
cache13–9-0.0413%18 May
cache10–13-0.0718%18 May
cache13–5-0.0019%17 May
cache9–130.0321%12 May
cache13–5-0.0020%12 May
cache13–11-0.0417%10 May
cache2–13-0.1129%10 May
cache10–13-0.0129%8 May
cache7–13-0.0050%8 May
inferno13–6-0.0017%4 May
anubis10–13-0.0724%4 May
ancient13–1-0.058%4 May
inferno13–60.0518%3 May
nuke13–70.0929%30 Apr
inferno13–10.034%30 Apr
cache13–60.0216%30 Apr
dust213–9-0.058%27 Apr
inferno12–12-0.0131%22 Apr
dust213–8-0.0420%22 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0329%11 Apr
anubis5–30.0818%5 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0918%4 Apr
alpine3–13-0.0038%4 Apr
mirage8–130.0120%28 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0418%28 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0221%28 Mar
train7–130.0113%27 Mar
vertigo12–120.0225%27 Mar
mirage16–130.0111%20 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0317%20 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0123%9 Mar
dust213–60.0726%7 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0410%26 Feb
ancient13–70.0211%26 Feb
inferno16–140.0221%25 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0623%24 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0116%23 Feb
overpass16–13-0.0216%22 Feb
dust213–80.0118%21 Feb
anubis13–80.0021%14 Feb
mirage16–12-0.0517%13 Feb
nuke13–50.0327%13 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0116%13 Feb
nuke8–130.0120%13 Feb
dust213–80.0617%13 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0614%13 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →