Airpod™

Airpod™ — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198385725527[U:1:425459799]Steam profile ↗

805Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,863Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2263 of 9591 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,706 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAirpod™FACEITLevel 9 · 1,706 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,863 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50482Last 10050%Win rateLWLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression7.9
Utility6.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time535ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12nukeWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29161355%-0.00
cacheC167944%0.00
dust2B126650%-0.02
infernoS128467%0.02
anubisA116555%-0.00
ancientB105550%-0.01
nukeD102820%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

632Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
78.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10456%1.2716.7
Ancient5044%1.1516.4
Inferno4344%1.0816.5
Dust23633%0.8814.1
Anubis2952%1.1215.1
Nuke1656%0.9917.4
Overpass838%1.2417.4
Cache757%1.0715.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
527msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
58.0%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
10.08HE damage / grenade
10.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.7413% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0018%28 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0123%27 Aug
cache10–130.0635%27 Aug
anubis0–30.0150%27 Aug
cache3–13-0.0230%27 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0020%26 Aug
cache8–13-0.0518%26 Aug
mirage13–30.0621%26 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0217%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0823%22 Aug
cache13–9-0.0327%21 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0310%21 Aug
dust211–130.0123%20 Aug
inferno16–130.0621%20 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0419%19 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0122%19 Aug
mirage16–140.0618%19 Aug
cache13–40.0420%19 Aug
inferno13–110.0220%19 Aug
cache9–13-0.0017%19 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0126%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.0719%16 Aug
cache13–110.0323%15 Aug
cache13–50.0438%15 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0022%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0222%14 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0219%12 Aug
inferno13–80.0126%9 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0312%9 Aug
mirage13–20.0224%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.069%9 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0122%9 Aug
dust212–13-0.0624%5 Aug
anubis13–30.0718%5 Aug
cache6–13-0.0225%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0417%2 Aug
anubis13–110.0614%1 Aug
anubis13–20.0421%1 Aug
cache12–160.0122%1 Aug
anubis0–50.0536%1 Aug
nuke8–130.0131%1 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0610%30 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0415%26 Jul
dust213–9-0.0216%26 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0020%26 Jul
dust213–8-0.0510%26 Jul
inferno13–30.1824%25 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0414%25 Jul
cache13–160.0526%24 Jul
mirage5–10.0422%24 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0018%23 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0217%23 Jul
cache3–6-0.0225%19 Jul
anubis1–5-0.0638%19 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0211%19 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0418%19 Jul
cache11–13-0.0229%18 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0417%17 Jul
dust213–9-0.0212%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0132%17 Jul
mirage6–130.1126%12 Jul
cache13–8-0.0318%10 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0225%9 Jul
cache13–40.0128%9 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0418%9 Jul
nuke7–130.0310%8 Jul
inferno2–130.0139%7 Jul
dust213–50.0219%6 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0028%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0224%4 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0015%2 Jul
anubis13–6-0.109%28 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0329%27 Jun
dust29–130.0240%27 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0220%27 Jun
dust28–13-0.0522%24 Jun
mirage6–0-0.018%24 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0738%24 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0715%23 Jun
cache13–100.0117%22 Jun
mirage16–140.0025%22 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0138%19 Jun
mirage13–100.0421%19 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0123%18 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0311%18 Jun
inferno13–70.0221%18 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0228%17 Jun
mirage13–00.1037%16 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0318%11 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0414%11 Jun
dust213–80.0019%10 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0427%8 Jun
dust213–90.0033%7 Jun
dust27–130.0129%4 Jun
mirage15–150.0121%3 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0118%3 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0221%30 May
inferno13–70.0620%29 May
mirage8–13-0.0130%27 May
ancient9–13-0.0216%27 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →