VaL

VaL — CS2 Stats

76561198385224759[U:1:424959031]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,947Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,726Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#70555 of 251496 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 20,726 → 20,726
0Faceit ELO · 2,306 → 2,306
+18Tracked matches · now 1,947
+6.7ppWin rate · 46.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,726 -326 1 Mar – 5 Oct · 28 days played
18,53223,570peak 23,5701 Mar5 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,306 +0 16 Sept – 5 Oct · 3 observations
2,3062,306peak 2,30616 Sept5 Oct
23,844Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,306Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2026-02-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,306
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 194 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,844 below peak (23,570)
  • +2,194 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,274 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-10-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVaLPREMIER20,726 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,306csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning46
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +6.3pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.6
Utility3.0
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time597ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy25.2%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 19 Mar →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · shelter, 10 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 5 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 5 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 20anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213–959%0.00
cacheA2012–860%-0.00
dust2C145–936%0.00
ancientA148–657%-0.01
nukeC135–838%-0.01
anubisD61–517%-0.00
inferno—42–250%-0.01
overpass—22–0100%-0.03
fachwerk—10–10%-0.05
boulder—10–10%-0.03
shelter—11–0100%-0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.01
sanctum—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

673Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
81.3ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26353%1.0515.3
Ancient11351%1.0516.8
Nuke9851%1.1616.9
Dust26445%0.9914.7
Anubis3858%1.1716.0
Inferno3644%0.9515.5
Overpass2378%1.2015.8
Train1953%0.9314.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
588msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
5.65HE damage / grenade
3.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.345 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5099% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0632%12 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0230%12 Oct →
mirage7–130.0617%9 Oct →
inferno9–130.0029%8 Oct →
ancient13–1-0.0023%5 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0556%5 Oct →
anubis13–110.0531%5 Oct →
ancient13–70.0425%5 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0219%4 Oct →
mirage16–140.0128%4 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0916%1 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0131%13 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0419%22 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.050%21 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0336%20 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0327%17 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.0020%17 Jul →
mirage13–80.0319%16 Jul →
cache13–60.0228%15 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0230%15 Jul →
dust213–40.0518%15 Jul →
mirage11–00.0132%15 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0724%14 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0116%14 Jul →
nuke10–130.0525%14 Jul →
ancient13–60.0316%14 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0320%13 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0513%13 Jul →
cache13–30.0137%12 Jul →
fachwerk7–13-0.0519%10 Jul →
boulder3–13-0.0323%10 Jul →
shelter9–2-0.0557%10 Jul →
mirage9–130.0018%8 Jul →
dust213–70.0436%8 Jul →
cache5–13-0.1032%2 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0024%29 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0419%29 Jun →
mirage13–70.1319%29 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0118%28 Jun →
nuke12–12-0.0618%28 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0720%28 Jun →
nuke9–20.1340%27 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0040%23 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0328%23 Jun →
dust211–130.0124%23 Jun →
dust213–100.0628%21 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0422%21 Jun →
anubis12–120.0821%21 Jun →
cache13–1-0.0227%20 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0617%17 Jun →
cache13–90.0626%16 Jun →
mirage7–1-0.005%16 Jun →
cache13–110.0624%10 May →
cache12–12-0.0021%7 May →
cache6–13-0.0319%6 May →
cache13–80.0035%6 May →
mirage11–130.0214%5 May →
cache4–130.0336%5 May →
nuke8–13-0.0916%5 May →
cache13–11-0.0727%5 May →
cache13–80.0316%2 May →
cache2–13-0.0633%2 May →
cache13–11-0.0120%2 May →
cache13–50.0328%2 May →
cache13–90.0531%2 May →
cache0–13-0.0819%29 Apr →
cache13–60.0028%29 Apr →
cache12–120.0220%29 Apr →
ancient13–60.0546%28 Apr →
inferno16–14-0.0314%22 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.0827%22 Apr →
dust211–130.0319%21 Apr →
ancient7–130.0017%15 Apr →
mirage3–11-0.060%9 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0925%7 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0214%7 Apr →
nuke2–13-0.0817%6 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0026%6 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0221%6 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0614%5 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0317%1 Apr →
dust213–110.0413%1 Apr →
nuke13–3-0.0416%1 Apr →
dust26–100.019%29 Mar →
ancient11–130.0022%28 Mar →
mirage13–90.0138%26 Mar →
overpass13–90.0224%22 Mar →
mirage13–80.0227%20 Mar →
nuke13–60.1329%19 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0126%19 Mar →
dust213–80.0224%19 Mar →
mirage13–50.0527%19 Mar →
ancient13–70.0512%12 Mar →
nuke13–10-0.0223%8 Mar →
vertigo4–9-0.0123%3 Mar →
sanctum7–9-0.0521%3 Mar →
ancient13–60.0127%1 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0616%28 Feb →
mirage10–130.0016%25 Feb →
ancient17–19-0.0415%23 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.