Matteries

Matteries — CS2 Stats

76561198384735224[U:1:424469496]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,747Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMatteriesFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning56
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40528Last 10040%Win rateTWLLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch6.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time574ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−7.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · office, 26 Jun
38%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · office, 16 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · office, 3 Dec
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 24 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC60233738%0.03
anubisD124833%0.02
infernoS54180%0.05
train42250%0.01
grail41325%-0.01
vertigo3030%0.01
cache31233%0.02
overpass32167%-0.04
dust22020%-0.00
poseidon1010%-0.11
nuke110100%-0.07
agency110100%-0.00
jura110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

853Matches
53%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
68.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo20154%1.0214.3
Ancient15454%1.1115.9
Anubis12853%1.0014.0
Nuke9763%1.1315.6
Mirage8958%0.9312.3
Inferno6341%0.9613.8
Overpass2741%0.9113.9
Dust21747%0.7610.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
68.6%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
557msReaction time
44.1%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
8.69HE damage / grenade
5.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9721% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3964 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–120.0616%20 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0020%20 Sept
office8–13-0.0414%9 Sept
office4–130.0111%9 Sept
office9–13-0.0110%9 Sept
office13–60.0913%2 Sept
office13–90.0413%2 Sept
office3–10-0.1013%2 Sept
office7–130.0115%19 Aug
office4–130.0514%19 Aug
office13–70.0112%19 Aug
inferno13–50.0619%14 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.028%14 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0618%14 Aug
cache8–130.009%14 Aug
inferno9–70.0221%14 Aug
inferno9–40.0411%14 Aug
cache10–13-0.037%21 Jun
office13–70.0427%21 Jun
office12–120.0424%21 Jun
office9–130.0619%11 Jun
office9–130.0626%11 Jun
office11–13-0.0112%11 Jun
office6–130.0516%11 Jun
cache13–90.0817%7 Jun
office13–100.0715%7 Jun
office12–120.0316%7 Jun
office13–50.0516%3 Jun
office7–130.0012%3 Jun
office8–13-0.048%20 Apr
office13–80.0214%20 Apr
office13–100.1317%15 Apr
office12–120.0110%6 Apr
office7–130.0518%6 Apr
office8–130.0218%6 Apr
office13–110.0825%6 Apr
office5–13-0.0124%31 Mar
office4–13-0.0418%4 Mar
office6–13-0.0431%22 Feb
office9–130.0420%22 Feb
poseidon8–8-0.1110%28 Jan
office13–90.0321%21 Jan
office13–5-0.0117%21 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0414%10 Dec
anubis13–90.0316%10 Dec
anubis4–130.0415%10 Dec
office6–13-0.0113%10 Dec
office13–60.0516%3 Dec
office13–30.1111%3 Dec
office13–100.0610%3 Dec
office4–13-0.0019%3 Dec
office6–130.1122%3 Dec
office11–130.0420%5 Nov
office10–13-0.019%5 Nov
office13–4-0.0319%29 Oct
office11–130.029%29 Oct
anubis13–100.0818%15 Oct
anubis6–13-0.0014%15 Oct
office13–60.0331%1 Oct
office4–13-0.0223%1 Oct
office13–11-0.0013%1 Oct
overpass13–0-0.0121%24 Sept
overpass13–11-0.037%24 Sept
overpass1–13-0.1011%24 Sept
vertigo9–130.1028%10 Sept
train11–130.0813%10 Sept
train13–10-0.0111%10 Sept
nuke9–5-0.0729%27 Aug
inferno8–80.0422%27 Aug
grail11–13-0.0720%27 Aug
grail13–60.0314%27 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0125%20 Aug
anubis12–120.0518%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0214%13 Aug
office13–80.0124%6 Aug
office13–110.0625%6 Aug
office7–130.1033%6 Aug
agency13–4-0.0023%6 Aug
dust26–130.0113%30 Jul
office5–130.0232%30 Jul
jura13–60.0618%30 Jul
office4–13-0.0138%16 Jul
office5–130.1130%16 Jul
train11–130.0125%16 Jul
train13–8-0.0418%16 Jul
office13–80.0524%10 Jul
office11–130.1225%2 Jul
grail5–13-0.0621%2 Jul
inferno9–40.1013%2 Jul
vertigo3–9-0.0517%2 Jul
grail12–120.0517%2 Jul
office13–40.1516%26 Jun
anubis11–130.0715%26 Jun
anubis8–130.0326%26 Jun
office13–110.0519%21 Jun
office13–8-0.0127%21 Jun
office2–13-0.0710%21 Jun
office5–13-0.0123%21 Jun
office11–13-0.0521%20 Jun
office10–13-0.0236%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →