m0shne4gu

m0shne4gu — CS2 Stats

MD76561198377538175[U:1:417272447]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,582Tracked matches29%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,840Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,785Blue band · top ~34.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,582 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,785 -1,835 7 Aug – 12 Nov · 44 days played
13,78519,253peak 19,2537 Aug12 Nov
19,457Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2026-07-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,468 below peak (19,253)
  • -3,367 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,507 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,215 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate34.4%42.7%43.8%9.3% short
Shot accuracy19.4%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.010.991.02meets
Match win rate38.4%43.9%44.7%6.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGm0shne4guFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,785 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning61
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLLLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 4–14–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.1
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.9

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.1
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time601ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 4 Sept →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 21 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 17 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 8 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L8Current streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 22anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2310–1343%-0.02
dust2A2213–959%-0.02
infernoD165–1131%-0.02
nukeB136–746%-0.00
ancientB105–550%-0.01
cacheC94–544%-0.02
anubisD72–529%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

124,563Lifetime kills
1.01K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
6,055Matches
38.4%Match win rate
34.4%Headshot %
19.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 4 players
11,621MVPs
2,550Hours (in match)
7,884Bombs planted
1,117Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,150
AWP10,090
FAMAS3,561
MP92,872
P2502,441

Lifetime map wins

11,003inferno
10,533dust2
5,841nuke
2,912train
1,487vertigo
1,263cbble
107italy
104office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,030Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
—ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
603msReaction time
68.0%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
15.19HE damage / grenade
3.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9493% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.6924 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–13-0.0820%11 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0915%9 Nov →
ancient11–130.0520%5 Nov →
ancient2–13-0.065%5 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.028%4 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0821%30 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0315%30 Oct →
nuke9–130.0314%29 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0226%29 Oct →
mirage13–110.0523%29 Oct →
nuke15–150.0416%29 Oct →
inferno7–130.0220%29 Oct →
anubis13–60.0315%28 Oct →
inferno13–90.0722%27 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0019%27 Oct →
cache11–13-0.029%22 Oct →
inferno12–160.0119%21 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0214%20 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0711%20 Oct →
nuke15–150.0217%19 Oct →
ancient16–120.0614%16 Oct →
cache13–10-0.034%15 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0718%15 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0715%15 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0310%8 Oct →
anubis13–110.019%7 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.056%6 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0814%2 Oct →
cache9–130.0113%2 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0714%2 Oct →
anubis3–110.0215%2 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.005%30 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0312%29 Sept →
mirage13–100.0816%29 Sept →
dust213–20.0217%29 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0111%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0613%25 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0519%23 Sept →
dust213–80.067%23 Sept →
nuke9–130.0019%18 Sept →
dust26–00.036%18 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0218%17 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0714%17 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0213%15 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0513%14 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0312%10 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0320%9 Sept →
mirage13–100.048%9 Sept →
mirage13–0-0.028%8 Sept →
nuke13–10.069%7 Sept →
inferno13–30.0023%7 Sept →
dust28–130.0527%7 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0511%7 Sept →
dust212–1-0.0317%7 Sept →
inferno9–60.1315%4 Sept →
nuke13–40.0411%4 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0312%4 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0319%4 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0415%3 Sept →
dust213–70.0413%3 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0315%24 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0117%24 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0217%24 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0417%21 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.027%21 Aug →
cache13–60.0019%20 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0113%20 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0111%17 Aug →
mirage13–80.0212%17 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0613%14 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.038%13 Aug →
inferno8–130.0012%13 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.119%12 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0320%12 Aug →
mirage15–150.0113%11 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0113%11 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0722%10 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.0726%10 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.1311%7 Aug →
nuke13–110.0014%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.058%29 Jul →
mirage10–130.0316%29 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0314%28 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0415%28 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.045%27 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0910%27 Jul →
mirage13–40.0123%27 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0212%23 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0116%23 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0913%22 Jul →
dust213–60.0428%22 Jul →
dust213–100.0118%21 Jul →
dust213–90.0029%21 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0312%20 Jul →
cache9–13-0.049%20 Jul →
nuke6–9-0.0412%16 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0020%16 Jul →
mirage13–80.0120%16 Jul →
dust27–13-0.013%9 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.085%8 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.