✪ KaKalitツ — CS2 Stats

CA76561198373890297[U:1:413624569]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,120Tracked matches71%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,944Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#943 of 17617 tracked

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning47

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–36–5Last 10059%Win rateLWWTWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9

Aggression5.2

Utility5.5

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.7

Utility5.5

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time588ms+9ms

first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy17.9%−6.1%

first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–0Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 89% over 9ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	31	18–13	58%	-0.02
dust2	S	19	13–6	68%	0.00
anubis	S	13	9–4	69%	-0.01
cache	S	9	8–1	89%	-0.02
nuke	C	8	3–5	38%	0.05
ancient	D	7	1–6	14%	0.00
inferno	—	4	3–1	75%	0.06
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.01
eldorado	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05
poseidon	—	2	1–1	50%	0.09
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,074Matches

52%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

75.6ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	157	51%	0.94	15.1
Dust2	76	51%	1.05	16.7
Inferno	62	52%	1.04	16.7
Anubis	41	56%	0.97	15.2
Ancient	23	52%	1.03	14.4
Vertigo	18	39%	1.14	16.4
Nuke	17	41%	1.06	14.5
Overpass	15	40%	0.98	14.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.2%Spray accuracy

78.7%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

606msReaction time

27.3%T opening success

45.8%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

10.2%Flash assists

7.53HE damage / grenade

15.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.26% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	8–13	-0.05	32%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	25%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.04	25%	24 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	10%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	14%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.04	8%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	13%	22 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	12%	21 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.07	11%	21 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	29%	21 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	17%	20 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.09	17%	19 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.00	17%	19 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.09	13%	19 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.10	21%	13 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	14%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	26%	4 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	28%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	13%	3 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.12	8%	29 Jul →
eldorado	7–9	0.02	19%	29 Jul →
poseidon	1–9	0.00	0%	27 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	0.17	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.04	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.04	18%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	21%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	21%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	29%	23 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	22%	21 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	24%	19 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.05	33%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	18%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	9%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	14%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–3	-0.03	12%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	17%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	26%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.11	19%	13 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.00	15%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.05	17%	12 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.03	28%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.08	19%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–2	-0.00	14%	12 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	19%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.07	20%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	20%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.06	23%	10 Jul →
mirage	6–4	0.03	25%	10 Jul →
eldorado	6–9	-0.12	18%	10 Jul →
vertigo	9–3	0.19	9%	10 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	22%	10 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	15%	9 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	11%	9 Jul →
vertigo	0–6	-0.12	0%	5 Jul →
nuke	9–0	0.12	100%	5 Jul →
inferno	9–3	0.06	40%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–8	-0.05	31%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–10	-0.00	14%	5 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	30%	5 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.05	8%	4 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.03	20%	4 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.04	15%	4 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	46%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	50%	30 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	50%	30 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.00	22%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	38%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.03	18%	28 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	20%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	12%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	17%	28 Jun →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	24%	21 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	25%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	20%	21 Jun →
overpass	11–13	0.01	15%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	13%	20 Jun →
cache	13–1	0.03	33%	19 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.09	20%	19 Jun →
ancient	1–4	-0.00	33%	17 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	18%	17 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	17%	7 Jun →
inferno	9–1	0.22	21%	7 Jun →
nuke	9–2	0.19	22%	6 Jun →
nuke	7–9	0.03	7%	6 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	21%	31 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	27%	31 May →
dust2	13–0	-0.00	60%	31 May →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	10%	30 May →
dust2	13–7	0.02	19%	29 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	22%	29 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	16%	27 May →
nuke	12–12	0.02	38%	24 May →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	15%	24 May →
ancient	15–15	-0.00	18%	24 May →
mirage	13–4	0.03	22%	23 May →
dust2	13–8	0.07	31%	23 May →