OLISE

OLISE — CS2 Stats

CN76561198372938462[U:1:412672734]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

598Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (54 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+28Tracked matches · now 598
+8.6ppWin rate · 41.4% → 50.0%

Rating over time

35Days played since 2026-03-21

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOLISEFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning54
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–55–1Last 10044%Win rateWLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 453ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 465ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility7.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.4
Utility7.9
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time521ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy27.5%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 27.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 24 Mar →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 1 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2611–1542%-0.01
dust2A2514–1156%0.01
infernoD194–1521%-0.02
mirageS1711–665%-0.01
anubisD51–420%-0.04
cache—40–40%-0.04
nuke—32–167%0.03
overpass—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

330Matches
58%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
71.1ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7757%1.1913.3
Inferno6047%0.9513.0
Mirage5054%1.2613.4
Anubis4450%1.0013.3
Dust23972%1.1013.1
Nuke1560%1.2114.6
Overpass667%1.0116.0
Cache425%0.7210.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.9%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
504msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
15.8%Flash assists
9.42HE damage / grenade
19.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8814% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–10-0.0428%11 Oct →
mirage11–130.0434%11 Oct →
inferno10–130.0137%11 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0738%10 Oct →
dust213–30.0724%10 Oct →
ancient13–160.0825%10 Oct →
dust216–140.0217%8 Oct →
mirage16–140.0218%8 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0714%8 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0219%7 Oct →
mirage13–100.0324%7 Oct →
dust213–40.0222%7 Oct →
dust216–190.0029%27 Sept →
mirage5–130.0124%27 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0429%27 Sept →
dust213–30.0632%26 Sept →
ancient5–130.0035%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0339%26 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0319%25 Sept →
nuke13–20.1026%25 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0428%24 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0023%24 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0436%23 Sept →
dust213–50.0225%23 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0233%23 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0213%22 Sept →
ancient13–100.0035%22 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0536%3 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0421%3 Sept →
dust213–70.0127%2 Sept →
inferno13–50.0328%2 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0231%2 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0338%2 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0419%2 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0323%2 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0442%1 Sept →
ancient13–10.0224%1 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0521%31 Aug →
dust29–130.0218%31 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0326%31 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0026%27 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0520%27 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0418%27 Aug →
ancient16–120.0132%26 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0212%26 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0222%26 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0319%25 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0318%25 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0121%24 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0324%24 Aug →
ancient13–80.0041%24 Aug →
inferno1–1-0.110%24 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0422%24 Aug →
nuke13–100.0126%24 Aug →
ancient14–160.0429%23 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0324%23 Aug →
dust213–10.0727%23 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0217%22 Aug →
ancient13–70.0930%22 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0230%22 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0123%10 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0023%10 Jul →
inferno9–130.0338%26 May →
mirage1–13-0.0329%26 May →
dust213–6-0.0120%25 May →
mirage13–2-0.0614%25 May →
anubis5–13-0.0518%14 May →
inferno12–16-0.0220%14 May →
ancient16–13-0.0224%14 May →
dust24–13-0.0821%13 May →
ancient5–13-0.0133%13 May →
mirage13–110.0229%12 May →
inferno13–6-0.0117%12 May →
mirage13–50.0421%11 May →
dust213–16-0.0229%11 May →
mirage13–9-0.0521%28 Apr →
dust210–130.0333%28 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.0738%28 Apr →
inferno10–130.0119%27 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0520%27 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.0122%27 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0731%26 Mar →
anubis6–13-0.068%26 Mar →
dust29–130.0829%26 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0522%26 Mar →
inferno7–130.0020%25 Mar →
dust213–30.0314%25 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0119%25 Mar →
dust213–70.0315%24 Mar →
ancient13–60.1226%24 Mar →
inferno13–160.0633%23 Mar →
mirage13–9-0.0123%23 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0824%23 Mar →
dust216–120.0441%22 Mar →
anubis22–190.0124%22 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0429%22 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.0430%21 Mar →
inferno13–16-0.0514%21 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0630%21 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0639%21 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.