Trakais

Trakais — CS2 Stats

76561198369716704[U:1:409450976]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,808Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,522Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,522 +2,883 25 Sept – 25 Oct · 27 days played
15,19421,994peak 21,99425 Sept25 Oct
21,994Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,472 below peak (21,994)
  • +2,883 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,478 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrakaisFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER18,522 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning63
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateLWWLTLLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 3–5–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 6–12–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility7.4
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.7

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 59% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning6.3
Utility7.4
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time563ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 20 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 7–0 · ancient, 15 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 21 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 74% over 23mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2317–674%0.01
dust2C188–1044%-0.00
infernoC188–1044%-0.00
mirageD124–833%0.01
anubisD124–833%-0.00
ancientA85–363%0.01
cacheB84–450%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

431Matches
49%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
—ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
66.5%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
565msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
54.1%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
10.11HE damage / grenade
10.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4907% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–160.0016%25 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0515%22 Oct →
inferno13–110.0111%21 Oct →
inferno8–130.0416%21 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0410%21 Oct →
mirage5–130.0119%21 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0420%21 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0611%21 Oct →
nuke13–80.1611%20 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0029%20 Oct →
nuke13–30.0117%19 Oct →
ancient10–130.0617%19 Oct →
anubis9–130.006%19 Oct →
anubis10–130.035%19 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0711%18 Oct →
inferno7–130.0119%18 Oct →
mirage4–130.0112%18 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0218%17 Oct →
ancient13–60.0018%16 Oct →
nuke16–120.0522%16 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0115%16 Oct →
nuke13–110.0126%15 Oct →
mirage5–130.0112%15 Oct →
nuke8–2-0.0220%15 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0316%15 Oct →
ancient7–00.0643%15 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0212%14 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0014%14 Oct →
cache0–13-0.0221%14 Oct →
mirage8–130.0414%14 Oct →
dust213–40.1019%14 Oct →
anubis10–130.0612%13 Oct →
nuke14–160.0623%13 Oct →
dust213–70.0213%13 Oct →
cache12–160.0014%12 Oct →
mirage15–150.0812%12 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0523%12 Oct →
mirage13–80.0510%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0425%11 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.036%11 Oct →
inferno13–80.0516%11 Oct →
ancient13–50.0518%10 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0011%10 Oct →
cache13–100.0117%10 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0213%10 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0112%10 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.013%10 Oct →
dust210–130.0119%8 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0514%8 Oct →
mirage6–130.019%8 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0524%8 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.038%8 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0228%8 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0412%8 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.046%7 Oct →
nuke13–60.1131%7 Oct →
anubis13–110.0215%7 Oct →
mirage13–110.0330%7 Oct →
nuke13–50.0213%7 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0112%7 Oct →
dust213–9-0.019%6 Oct →
inferno13–40.0311%6 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0816%6 Oct →
nuke13–110.0317%6 Oct →
anubis13–80.1012%6 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.024%5 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0411%5 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0316%5 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.049%4 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0531%4 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0118%3 Oct →
nuke13–80.0223%3 Oct →
nuke13–110.0032%3 Oct →
inferno3–130.0140%2 Oct →
dust213–90.0915%2 Oct →
dust213–100.0211%2 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0114%2 Oct →
anubis13–90.019%2 Oct →
inferno13–90.0512%2 Oct →
nuke15–150.047%1 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.008%1 Oct →
inferno13–100.0320%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.0510%30 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0120%30 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0011%30 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.087%30 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.013%29 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0913%29 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0422%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0219%28 Sept →
mirage13–10.0318%28 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0211%28 Sept →
nuke9–130.0116%28 Sept →
dust213–40.0218%28 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.084%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0320%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0713%26 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0619%25 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0423%25 Sept →
dust27–130.025%25 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.