✪geipoi — CS2 Stats

76561198367784883[U:1:407519155]

4,686Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.6 Developing

Premier CS Rating19,875Purple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9730 of 21784 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49

Positioning52

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLWLWLWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.9

Aggression7.4

Utility5.9

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9

Positioning5.2

Utility5.9

Mechanics4.5

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time580ms−57ms

first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms

Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.5%

first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 13–1

13–1Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	C	18	7–11	39%	0.00
dust2	B	17	8–9	47%	0.00
mirage	C	13	5–8	38%	0.00
nuke	B	12	6–6	50%	0.01
ancient	D	9	3–6	33%	0.00
cache	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.00
anubis	S	6	5–1	83%	0.01
overpass	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.02
vertigo	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
italy	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.09
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

103Matches

57%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

88.1ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	13	54%	1.03	13.7
Mirage	9	56%	1.05	15.0
Anubis	9	67%	1.18	14.9
Ancient	7	57%	1.03	12.9
Nuke	7	57%	0.97	12.9
Dust2	5	40%	1.13	16.4
Overpass	2	50%	0.94	15.0
Vertigo	1	100%	1.36	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy

32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.4%Spray accuracy

70.0%Counter-strafing

11.1°Preaim

580msReaction time

31.9%T opening success

51.2%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

11.43HE damage / grenade

11.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4862 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.857% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	0.02	30%	27 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.04	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	28%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.01	19%	17 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	18%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.09	10%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	18%	11 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	26%	11 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.07	30%	7 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.01	8%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.06	0%	5 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	24%	5 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	17%	4 Aug →
italy	2–8	-0.05	16%	4 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.07	14%	2 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.00	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	26%	28 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.01	13%	28 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	25%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	15%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.05	19%	27 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	19%	27 Jul →
boulder	3–13	0.02	24%	15 Jul →
shelter	13–3	0.02	18%	15 Jul →
fachwerk	6–13	-0.09	6%	15 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.03	15%	12 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.00	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	4%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.04	20%	12 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.04	19%	10 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.02	15%	10 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	13%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	16%	10 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	14%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	13%	9 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	14%	9 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.01	7%	9 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.00	22%	9 Jul →
overpass	6–13	0.06	14%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	21%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.05	25%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	13%	6 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.09	15%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.09	20%	2 Jul →
ancient	6–1	0.03	21%	2 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	19%	1 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	22%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.02	19%	30 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.11	8%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	21%	30 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	8%	30 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	38%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.04	22%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	19%	29 Jun →
vertigo	7–13	-0.02	21%	27 Jun →
inferno	3–13	0.00	11%	27 Jun →
ancient	4–13	0.04	38%	26 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.03	16%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.03	14%	26 Jun →
train	13–9	0.01	16%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	26%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.01	11%	24 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	12%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	20%	24 Jun →
overpass	9–13	-0.05	7%	24 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	12%	24 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	17%	23 Jun →
inferno	16–13	-0.01	16%	23 Jun →
dust2	12–16	0.02	21%	22 Jun →
nuke	2–13	-0.09	9%	22 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	25%	21 Jun →
overpass	10–13	-0.01	16%	21 Jun →
inferno	7–13	-0.09	10%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–2	-0.04	25%	21 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	10%	21 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.00	14%	21 Jun →
warden	13–3	0.11	14%	20 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.12	13%	19 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.16	11%	19 Jun →
train	5–13	0.04	23%	19 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	17%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.22	30%	19 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	11%	12 Jun →
vertigo	13–11	0.09	21%	12 Jun →
overpass	13–8	-0.02	21%	12 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	18%	6 Jun →
inferno	9–13	0.05	18%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.03	18%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.00	13%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	14%	2 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.10	20%	2 Jun →
overpass	13–16	-0.01	16%	2 Jun →
overpass	16–14	-0.07	12%	2 Jun →
italy	13–8	-0.02	16%	1 Jun →
cache	1–13	-0.05	17%	1 Jun →
office	11–8	0.02	20%	1 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	24%	31 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	20%	31 May →