aspen zeneki

aspen zeneki — CS2 Stats

CH76561198357586641[U:1:397320913]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

237Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 21 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,920 +2,267 10 Jul12 May · 16 days played
10,65313,622peak 13,62210 Jul12 May
13,748Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2025-05-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaspen zenekiFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning48
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42544Last 10042%Win rateLWLLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −129ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility3.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 709ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.8
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time697ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 697ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 14–16 · nuke, 28 Mar
62%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · cache, 3 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 2 May
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 31 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 48% over 31infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31151648%-0.02
nukeB1991047%-0.02
dust2C1981142%-0.01
infernoD1861233%-0.02
ancient42250%-0.01
cache41325%-0.03
anubis31233%-0.06
overpass2020%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches
43%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
79.6ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
28.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.2%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
709msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
4.37HE damage / grenade
5.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 708.5255ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4513 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.366% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0217%11 Sept
nuke13–9-0.1323%11 Sept
dust24–13-0.0414%4 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0121%4 Sept
dust213–90.0628%3 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0854%3 Sept
nuke7–90.0221%26 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0311%26 Aug
ancient13–110.0224%17 Aug
nuke4–13-0.094%3 Aug
mirage9–1-0.0323%3 Aug
cache13–50.0236%3 Aug
dust22–7-0.060%31 Jul
anubis12–16-0.0529%31 Jul
dust213–50.0323%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0310%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0519%31 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0815%30 Jul
mirage13–20.0231%30 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0425%30 Jul
cache12–12-0.0519%3 Jul
cache7–13-0.0262%3 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0521%19 Jun
mirage13–70.0625%12 May
dust25–13-0.0613%8 May
mirage8–13-0.0122%5 May
inferno6–9-0.0716%5 May
cache5–13-0.0519%4 May
dust213–9-0.0824%4 May
dust213–30.0038%4 May
inferno5–9-0.0725%2 May
mirage13–8-0.0213%18 Apr
mirage13–70.0232%2 Apr
nuke6–13-0.016%1 Apr
dust28–13-0.0333%1 Apr
dust213–30.1035%1 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0418%31 Mar
mirage13–00.1040%31 Mar
mirage9–130.0124%31 Mar
dust24–130.0724%31 Mar
inferno13–60.1114%31 Mar
dust213–10-0.0812%30 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0022%29 Mar
nuke16–130.0138%29 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0424%29 Mar
nuke8–8-0.019%28 Mar
dust213–30.065%28 Mar
nuke14–160.1226%28 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0419%28 Mar
ancient13–6-0.0021%28 Mar
mirage5–13-0.019%28 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0618%27 Mar
dust22–13-0.0925%23 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0523%23 Mar
dust26–13-0.0121%15 Mar
anubis2–6-0.0933%15 Mar
mirage13–70.0319%14 Mar
overpass8–130.009%22 Feb
dust213–60.0137%21 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0115%20 Feb
inferno13–110.0113%19 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0417%18 Feb
inferno8–80.0220%18 Feb
dust29–130.0413%18 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0228%18 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0929%17 Feb
nuke13–110.0118%17 Feb
mirage13–110.0118%9 Feb
inferno13–80.0113%9 Feb
inferno4–13-0.1015%9 Feb
inferno9–50.0113%25 Jan
inferno6–9-0.0415%25 Jan
nuke13–110.0115%25 Jan
dust26–130.0314%25 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0425%25 Jan
inferno13–40.0628%24 Jan
mirage13–80.0316%24 Jan
nuke2–13-0.055%22 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0917%22 Jan
nuke13–20.0235%22 Jan
mirage13–70.0017%22 Jan
nuke13–11-0.069%21 Jan
nuke9–2-0.0129%20 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0520%12 Oct
mirage4–13-0.0721%12 Oct
inferno8–13-0.0318%11 Oct
dust24–13-0.0444%11 Oct
nuke1–13-0.0511%11 Oct
ancient2–13-0.0315%11 Oct
mirage13–7-0.0625%11 Oct
inferno14–160.0216%11 Oct
inferno13–7-0.0115%2 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1420%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.097%1 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0716%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.033%30 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0411%10 Jul
nuke13–70.0319%7 Jul
mirage13–30.0518%27 May
mirage10–130.0016%21 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →