faselaneio | Nackenklatsche2go

faselaneio | Nackenklatsche2go — CS2 Stats

CH76561198356559494[U:1:396293766]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

853Tracked matches64%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating25,264Top 10% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19097 of 259201 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,264 → 25,264
0Faceit ELO · 1,809 → 1,809
+3Tracked matches · now 853
0.0ppWin rate · 64.3% → 64.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,264 +2,103 24 Jul – 19 Oct · 30 days played
22,69125,755peak 25,75524 Jul19 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,809 +0 28 Aug – 19 Oct · 4 observations
1,8091,809peak 1,80928 Aug19 Oct
25,755Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,809Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,809
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 192 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 491 below peak (25,755)
  • +2,103 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,736 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-10-19
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfaselaneio | Nackenklatsc…PREMIER25,264 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,809csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning66
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWLWWWTWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim9.0
Utility6.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch6.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.6
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time522ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–10 · vertigo, 16 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · anubis, 1 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 16–12 · ancient, 8 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB2111–1052%0.03
cacheS1711–665%0.03
ancientB168–850%0.03
infernoB137–654%0.05
mirageD103–730%0.04
dust2S96–367%0.05
nukeD72–529%0.03
vertigo—21–150%0.14
office—22–0100%0.09
train—11–0100%0.01
poseidon—10–10%-0.07
fachwerk—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

176Matches
57%Win rate
1.60Avg K/D
97.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
35%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5349%1.5320.4
Inferno2669%1.9521.0
Anubis1867%1.5718.3
Ancient1765%1.5119.4
Dust21662%1.7119.6
Nuke838%1.4823.9
Vertigo771%1.5421.9
Overpass450%2.2022.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
511msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
11.79HE damage / grenade
8.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.0619% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.1620%23 Oct →
inferno4–130.0615%23 Oct →
cache13–20.1129%23 Oct →
cache13–80.0414%18 Oct →
train13–50.0121%18 Oct →
vertigo12–120.0817%18 Oct →
office13–100.1026%17 Oct →
dust28–130.0416%10 Oct →
cache5–130.0517%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0114%9 Oct →
anubis13–30.1313%9 Oct →
office13–30.0918%3 Oct →
dust213–60.1013%3 Oct →
inferno13–30.0731%25 Sept →
anubis4–130.0322%25 Sept →
mirage13–110.0627%25 Sept →
cache16–120.0413%9 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0324%9 Sept →
inferno5–20.0014%9 Sept →
ancient16–120.0123%8 Sept →
ancient13–10.0311%7 Sept →
cache15–150.0219%7 Sept →
anubis13–160.0111%7 Sept →
anubis13–50.0516%7 Sept →
inferno13–40.0831%7 Sept →
ancient11–130.0923%5 Sept →
anubis0–2-0.03100%1 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0613%31 Aug →
ancient13–40.0322%31 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0127%31 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0114%28 Aug →
inferno13–90.0223%28 Aug →
cache13–50.0823%28 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0925%28 Aug →
anubis12–60.0615%28 Aug →
mirage10–130.0122%27 Aug →
anubis13–70.0924%27 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0113%25 Aug →
nuke15–150.0725%25 Aug →
cache0–13-0.0614%20 Aug →
nuke13–110.0916%20 Aug →
inferno13–60.1117%20 Aug →
mirage9–130.0725%20 Aug →
dust213–100.0028%19 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.039%19 Aug →
ancient11–130.0124%19 Aug →
cache8–2-0.0023%19 Aug →
mirage13–40.1126%17 Aug →
mirage12–120.0420%16 Aug →
poseidon1–9-0.0723%16 Aug →
ancient11–130.0625%16 Aug →
cache13–50.1516%14 Aug →
mirage16–130.0230%14 Aug →
ancient5–130.0625%13 Aug →
anubis9–130.0416%12 Aug →
inferno11–130.0123%12 Aug →
nuke13–160.0220%12 Aug →
inferno11–130.0330%11 Aug →
ancient10–20.0123%11 Aug →
anubis13–30.0920%11 Aug →
fachwerk13–40.1624%9 Aug →
dust20–80.0132%6 Aug →
dust213–110.0616%6 Aug →
cache13–60.0521%5 Aug →
ancient7–130.0620%3 Aug →
anubis13–110.0315%3 Aug →
inferno10–130.0721%3 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0116%2 Aug →
mirage7–130.0536%1 Aug →
mirage10–130.0413%1 Aug →
anubis13–10.1521%1 Aug →
ancient13–30.128%1 Aug →
dust213–100.0522%31 Jul →
anubis6–130.0720%31 Jul →
ancient13–50.0244%31 Jul →
anubis13–40.0928%30 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0321%27 Jul →
inferno1–30.1075%27 Jul →
ancient10–130.0425%27 Jul →
inferno13–80.0117%27 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0019%27 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0318%27 Jul →
dust213–50.0418%27 Jul →
cache13–20.0516%27 Jul →
inferno11–130.0421%27 Jul →
nuke13–60.0322%26 Jul →
cache11–130.0530%26 Jul →
ancient9–130.0029%26 Jul →
nuke1–130.0833%25 Jul →
anubis0–13-0.0729%24 Jul →
cache6–10.0721%24 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.059%24 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0017%24 Jul →
cache13–80.0120%24 Jul →
mirage8–130.0212%24 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0417%20 Jul →
ancient13–40.0925%20 Jul →
vertigo13–100.2026%16 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0228%12 Jul →
anubis13–80.0313%11 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.