Perseus

Perseus — CS2 Stats

MC76561198354233851[U:1:393968123]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

889Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPerseusFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning45
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression5.0
Utility3.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch0.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.5
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time637ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 720ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — overpass 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29131645%-0.02
dust2A2213959%0.01
ancientB137654%0.02
nukeD113827%-0.02
anubisA85363%-0.03
overpassA74357%-0.00
inferno43175%0.03
train42250%0.00
cache21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

93Matches
49%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
75.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3067%1.1215.7
Dust21547%0.9715.4
Anubis1560%0.9514.4
Ancient1050%1.0612.0
Vertigo540%0.8113.8
Inferno333%1.0514.7
Train10%0.389.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
27.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
636msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
9.70HE damage / grenade
4.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.4854% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0118%27 Jul
dust22–13-0.090%27 Jul
mirage13–40.0939%27 Jul
cache13–60.0033%27 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0824%28 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0419%27 Jun
ancient10–130.0313%27 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0625%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.0125%27 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0122%23 Jun
dust213–11-0.0816%16 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0316%16 Jun
dust210–130.0222%12 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0431%12 Jun
inferno13–90.0218%6 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0317%6 Jun
overpass2–13-0.095%6 Jun
dust213–16-0.0014%6 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0322%6 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0322%6 Jun
dust210–13-0.0538%5 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0130%5 Jun
ancient13–60.0618%5 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0226%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0111%27 May
dust210–13-0.0528%27 May
mirage3–13-0.1027%27 May
overpass10–13-0.0516%22 May
cache9–13-0.0821%9 May
anubis13–11-0.0713%3 May
dust213–70.0435%27 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0128%27 Apr
overpass13–3-0.0220%27 Apr
dust213–4-0.0228%26 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0614%26 Apr
mirage14–160.0119%26 Apr
dust29–13-0.0317%25 Apr
mirage13–30.0922%25 Apr
ancient13–110.0034%25 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0027%22 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0432%22 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0113%22 Apr
ancient13–100.0610%22 Apr
mirage9–130.0011%22 Apr
dust26–13-0.0418%22 Apr
dust24–13-0.018%21 Apr
dust214–16-0.0328%20 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0429%20 Apr
ancient13–40.0922%20 Apr
mirage9–130.0121%19 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0141%19 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0411%16 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0915%16 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0421%16 Apr
inferno16–13-0.0227%15 Apr
mirage13–10.0133%15 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0633%12 Apr
overpass16–13-0.0136%12 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0321%12 Apr
inferno13–110.0723%9 Apr
anubis13–90.0931%6 Apr
train13–40.0217%6 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0313%6 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0929%25 Mar
dust213–7-0.0625%25 Mar
mirage13–3-0.0625%14 Mar
ancient13–6-0.0343%14 Mar
dust213–10-0.0413%14 Mar
anubis9–13-0.087%14 Mar
overpass13–30.0134%13 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0612%12 Mar
anubis13–4-0.0122%23 Jan
dust216–140.0419%19 Jan
mirage13–70.1139%19 Jan
mirage13–70.0729%19 Jan
dust213–60.1130%19 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0119%19 Jan
overpass13–30.1925%19 Jan
dust213–80.1227%19 Jan
ancient13–60.0725%19 Jan
dust213–20.1730%19 Jan
train10–130.0836%19 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0621%19 Jan
nuke15–15-0.0112%19 Jan
dust213–70.1217%18 Jan
ancient13–16-0.0433%18 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0313%18 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0523%18 Jan
train8–13-0.0514%18 Jan
nuke13–90.0216%18 Jan
nuke13–100.0434%18 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0521%18 Jan
dust213–60.0513%18 Jan
train13–9-0.0421%18 Jan
inferno14–160.0319%18 Jan
mirage13–30.0032%18 Jan
ancient8–130.0519%18 Jan
ancient13–60.0715%18 Jan
nuke0–3-0.0533%18 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0620%18 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →