BENGKT

BENGKT — CS2 Stats

SE76561198349244910[U:1:388979182]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,281Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+58Tracked matches · now 3,281
+6.7ppWin rate · 46.7% → 53.3%

Rating over time

30Days played since 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBENGKTFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53–47Last 10053%Win rateWLLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · +78ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch0.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time568ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 10 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 16–19 · ancient, 10 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · cache, 3 Oct →
13–4Biggest win · vertigo, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
17–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoS2718–967%-0.02
ancientA1810–856%-0.03
mirageC177–1041%-0.03
dust2A169–756%-0.01
anubisS75–271%-0.00
nukeD62–433%-0.04
inferno—40–40%-0.04
cache—21–150%-0.06
overpass—21–150%-0.00
cbble_d—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

199Matches
53%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
65.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2658%0.9211.4
Anubis2080%0.8611.6
Dust21958%0.9511.2
Vertigo1867%0.7912.8
Inferno1520%0.7512.1
Ancient1527%0.8913.1
Nuke956%0.8613.7
Overpass1100%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
576msReaction time
54.6%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
18.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–11-0.0917%12 Oct →
vertigo7–130.0513%12 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0415%12 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0220%11 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.0223%11 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0025%10 Oct →
dust211–130.0029%10 Oct →
vertigo6–13-0.0324%10 Oct →
ancient16–19-0.0435%10 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.0313%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0213%10 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0532%10 Oct →
vertigo10–13-0.0218%8 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.0526%8 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0517%8 Oct →
dust213–10-0.013%8 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.066%7 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0617%7 Oct →
vertigo19–15-0.0219%7 Oct →
vertigo13–5-0.0921%6 Oct →
vertigo16–14-0.0635%6 Oct →
ancient13–70.0015%6 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.089%6 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0925%3 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0113%3 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0117%3 Oct →
mirage13–100.0117%2 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0215%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0018%2 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0320%2 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.039%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0318%30 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.0714%29 Sept →
overpass13–50.0820%29 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0314%29 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0316%28 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0317%28 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.078%28 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0419%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0521%27 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0113%27 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0432%27 Sept →
vertigo13–4-0.018%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0513%26 Sept →
vertigo4–130.0420%26 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.058%26 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0113%26 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0811%26 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0230%25 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0218%25 Sept →
dust22–13-0.1417%25 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0113%25 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0124%24 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0412%24 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0117%22 Sept →
vertigo8–10.0819%22 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0822%22 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0110%22 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0218%21 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0319%21 Sept →
dust211–20.0614%21 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0633%21 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.0319%21 Sept →
ancient13–90.0314%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0320%19 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0512%19 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0412%19 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0133%18 Sept →
vertigo19–220.0114%18 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.058%18 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0716%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0616%16 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0133%16 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0215%16 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0215%14 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0324%14 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0414%13 Sept →
anubis13–100.0412%13 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0427%13 Sept →
overpass3–13-0.0819%12 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.009%12 Sept →
dust213–100.0718%12 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0225%12 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0510%11 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0421%11 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0220%11 Sept →
anubis13–80.0920%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0321%10 Sept →
mirage13–60.0313%10 Sept →
ancient19–17-0.0314%10 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0217%9 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0317%9 Sept →
vertigo16–12-0.0715%9 Sept →
dust211–130.0416%7 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0116%7 Sept →
cbble_d8–13-0.076%7 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0014%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.029%6 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0820%5 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.104%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.