Gizmy — CS2 Stats

PRO100 ThievesUnited KingdomIGLSettings & gear profile →

76561198344226986[U:1:383961258]

3,589Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#6309 of 7872 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,603Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,603
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 397 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGizmyPEAK ELO3,603csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning58
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateLWLWWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.3
Aggression5.2
Utility7.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.8
Utility7.9
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time511ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — dust2 13–2
130Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 27infernoWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27171063%0.00
nukeB20101050%-0.00
mirageB147750%-0.02
anubisA148657%-0.00
ancientB126650%-0.02
infernoC94544%-0.01
overpass41325%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,888Matches
57%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
80.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient30659%1.2416.4
Anubis22466%1.2916.4
Mirage17158%1.2715.8
Nuke10965%1.2116.2
Dust29853%1.1715.5
Vertigo6462%1.2216.3
Inferno4252%1.3716.6
Overpass3158%1.6016.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$4,817Inventory value90ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Karambit | Fade (Factory New)$1,775★ Specialist Gloves | Crimson Kimono (Field-Tested)$1,703★ Stiletto Knife | Marble Fade (Factory New)$476FAMAS | Mecha Industries (Factory New)$227Desert Eagle | Cobalt Disruption (Factory New)$178AWP | Electric Hive (Factory New)$171

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.7%Spray accuracy
89.6%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
500msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
12.1%Flash assists
10.33HE damage / grenade
18.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9573% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0145%24 Aug
dust213–70.0034%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0317%24 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0123%24 Aug
dust213–60.0218%23 Aug
ancient13–110.0114%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0316%14 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0223%14 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0616%12 Aug
anubis13–60.0832%9 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0119%9 Aug
nuke16–120.0316%9 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0114%9 Aug
anubis13–110.0428%9 Aug
dust213–80.0719%9 Aug
nuke13–50.0416%9 Aug
dust213–60.0413%8 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0113%8 Aug
nuke13–30.0728%7 Aug
dust213–20.2029%7 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0428%26 Jul
dust20–13-0.1035%26 Jul
mirage13–40.0124%26 Jul
ancient15–19-0.0523%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0120%23 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0122%23 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0225%22 Jul
anubis13–110.0326%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0416%22 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0234%22 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0232%22 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0626%22 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0527%14 Jun
dust211–13-0.0116%14 Jun
dust213–11-0.0215%13 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0622%13 Jun
inferno9–130.0233%13 Jun
ancient13–90.0118%12 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0528%12 Jun
inferno13–50.0332%12 Jun
nuke10–130.0124%11 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0314%11 Jun
dust213–11-0.0326%9 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0042%9 Jun
nuke7–130.0220%8 Jun
mirage13–60.0426%8 Jun
dust28–13-0.0420%8 Jun
ancient12–9-0.0231%7 Jun
ancient0–2-0.100%7 Jun
mirage19–220.0118%6 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0327%6 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0916%13 May
dust24–13-0.0327%13 May
dust210–13-0.0210%12 May
nuke13–20.0227%12 May
mirage16–120.0219%12 May
dust211–13-0.0130%11 May
ancient10–130.0230%11 May
ancient13–11-0.0435%10 May
dust213–70.0328%10 May
overpass3–13-0.0329%9 May
nuke3–13-0.0724%9 May
dust213–90.0439%26 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0621%26 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0010%26 Apr
nuke13–00.0723%26 Apr
dust213–60.0337%26 Apr
nuke14–160.0013%26 Apr
anubis13–2-0.0330%26 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0231%25 Apr
dust216–14-0.0325%25 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0718%25 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0315%24 Apr
dust213–7-0.0214%24 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0027%24 Apr
dust213–80.0122%23 Apr
nuke13–40.0324%23 Apr
inferno13–80.0331%2 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0322%2 Apr
dust23–13-0.0229%2 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0318%31 Mar
dust216–12-0.0423%31 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0313%31 Mar
nuke13–80.0420%31 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0720%30 Mar
dust213–80.0730%30 Mar
anubis10–130.0228%25 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0426%25 Mar
dust213–80.0223%25 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0327%25 Mar
overpass3–13-0.0322%25 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0130%11 Mar
anubis13–30.0327%11 Mar
overpass7–11-0.0110%8 Mar
overpass4–2-0.126%8 Mar
dust211–13-0.0022%8 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0136%7 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0317%7 Mar
dust210–13-0.0324%7 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0216%6 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →