ⓃⓄⓉⓄ

ⓃⓄⓉⓄ — CS2 Stats

76561198338509825[U:1:378244097]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,056Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,186Blue band · top ~43.3% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 24 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,186 +788 24 Aug16 Sept · 24 days played
10,62312,273peak 12,27324 Aug16 Sept
12,450Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-08-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 87 below peak (12,273)
  • +788 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,814 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGⓃⓄⓉⓄPREMIER12,186 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning67
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateWLWWLWTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.3
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.7
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time602ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 29 Aug
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 11 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · dust2, 4 Sept
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 13 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 48mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A48301863%0.01
ancientB22111150%0.01
anubisB147750%0.00
mirageD72529%-0.01
nukeD62433%-0.03
cache220100%0.02
inferno110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

63Matches
49%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
70.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22654%0.8714.3
Anubis1547%0.8215.1
Ancient1173%0.9014.1
Cache40%0.9216.5
Vertigo250%0.5716.0
Nuke10%0.8315.0
Inferno10%0.6312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
42.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.2%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
604msReaction time
57.9%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
8.44HE damage / grenade
3.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3148 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0118%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0512%16 Sept
dust213–1-0.0419%15 Sept
dust213–80.1316%15 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0219%14 Sept
dust213–9-0.013%14 Sept
mirage15–150.0216%14 Sept
nuke3–130.0319%14 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0116%14 Sept
ancient11–130.0111%14 Sept
ancient3–130.0419%14 Sept
dust213–80.0119%14 Sept
dust213–00.040%13 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0014%13 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0113%13 Sept
mirage10–13-0.047%13 Sept
dust28–13-0.0627%13 Sept
dust213–10-0.0312%12 Sept
anubis13–110.0129%12 Sept
inferno13–70.0410%12 Sept
mirage13–70.0216%12 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0625%12 Sept
ancient13–70.0127%12 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0214%11 Sept
ancient13–50.0113%11 Sept
ancient9–130.0018%11 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0325%11 Sept
dust213–110.0519%11 Sept
dust27–130.0319%11 Sept
dust213–30.0444%11 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0126%10 Sept
anubis9–13-0.059%10 Sept
dust211–130.0120%10 Sept
anubis13–90.0218%10 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0120%9 Sept
dust216–140.0424%9 Sept
anubis13–70.0433%9 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0438%8 Sept
cache16–130.0525%8 Sept
anubis8–10.017%7 Sept
dust213–50.1019%7 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0215%7 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0719%6 Sept
dust212–120.0217%6 Sept
dust213–10-0.0326%6 Sept
dust211–13-0.0017%6 Sept
dust28–130.0029%6 Sept
dust213–4-0.0211%6 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0815%5 Sept
ancient13–40.0820%5 Sept
dust213–10-0.0524%5 Sept
dust213–70.1037%5 Sept
anubis9–130.0819%5 Sept
cache13–9-0.0120%5 Sept
dust213–3-0.0113%4 Sept
anubis13–90.0714%4 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0613%4 Sept
dust213–90.0211%4 Sept
dust28–13-0.0124%4 Sept
dust25–13-0.0121%4 Sept
dust213–40.0219%4 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0533%4 Sept
ancient13–3-0.046%3 Sept
dust216–140.0320%3 Sept
dust213–40.1020%3 Sept
dust28–13-0.0419%2 Sept
dust29–130.0112%2 Sept
dust211–13-0.0512%1 Sept
dust216–14-0.0019%1 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0421%1 Sept
dust213–9-0.0124%1 Sept
ancient13–90.0317%1 Sept
anubis13–70.0335%31 Aug
ancient13–70.0912%30 Aug
dust211–13-0.0719%30 Aug
dust213–40.1528%29 Aug
dust25–13-0.0423%29 Aug
ancient9–130.0514%29 Aug
dust213–20.0318%29 Aug
dust213–50.0515%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.0423%29 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0618%29 Aug
dust213–30.0516%29 Aug
dust29–130.0132%28 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0332%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.0014%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0510%28 Aug
dust213–6-0.0216%28 Aug
dust213–80.0221%28 Aug
ancient13–80.1115%27 Aug
dust213–0-0.0017%27 Aug
ancient13–10-0.037%27 Aug
dust213–100.0917%26 Aug
dust213–160.0718%26 Aug
ancient15–150.0122%25 Aug
ancient11–130.0110%25 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0614%25 Aug
dust213–1-0.0711%25 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0017%25 Aug
ancient10–30.0616%24 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →