miksu

miksu — CS2 Stats

76561198337709987[U:1:377444259]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,203Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,545Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#88812 of 251265 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,845 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,203 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,545 -3,109 20 Jun – 24 Sept · 17 days played
17,33424,098peak 24,09820 Jun24 Sept
24,144Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,845Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-01-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,845
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 156 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-24
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,553 below peak (24,098)
  • -3,855 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 455 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-24
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmiksuFACEITLevel 6 · 1,845 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,545 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,845csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning48
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWTWWWTLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −72ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 7–1–2 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 14–4–2 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility7.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.4

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.8
Utility7.2
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact9.8

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time658ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 704ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 3 Apr →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · vertigo, 3 Apr →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · vertigo, 8 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 27 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 24ancientWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2415–963%-0.01
infernoA1912–763%0.02
ancientD155–1033%-0.03
mirageC135–838%-0.02
nukeB126–650%0.01
anubisA106–460%0.01
vertigo—43–175%0.04
cache—32–167%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,015Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
72.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno18753%0.9113.4
Nuke12960%1.0115.2
Ancient11343%0.8713.8
Anubis10047%0.8513.6
Dust28644%0.8311.9
Vertigo7661%0.9113.0
Mirage3628%0.8012.9
Overpass1346%0.9211.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
639msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
41.7%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
8.73HE damage / grenade
12.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.5418% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–30.0119%21 Aug →
inferno15–150.0512%16 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0415%16 Aug →
dust216–12-0.0130%16 Aug →
cache13–50.0122%15 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0317%15 Aug →
ancient11–130.0723%15 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.056%8 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0022%8 Aug →
vertigo13–11-0.0113%8 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0518%8 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.047%8 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0512%8 Aug →
nuke10–130.0521%6 Aug →
dust213–1-0.0038%5 Aug →
nuke13–20.1117%5 Aug →
inferno13–110.0216%5 Aug →
ancient13–80.0317%5 Aug →
mirage13–40.0430%4 Aug →
anubis13–50.1020%4 Aug →
mirage13–30.0519%4 Aug →
inferno13–40.0324%2 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0517%2 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0615%1 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0110%1 Aug →
inferno10–130.0111%31 Jul →
mirage7–130.0017%29 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0215%29 Jul →
anubis14–160.0717%29 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0316%29 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0026%28 Jul →
inferno13–60.0428%28 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0526%28 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0415%28 Jul →
anubis9–50.0525%17 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0324%13 Jul →
dust26–130.0523%13 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.060%13 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0611%12 Jul →
dust216–13-0.0510%12 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0829%12 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0612%10 Jul →
dust215–150.0227%9 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0027%8 Jul →
inferno13–30.1216%8 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0513%5 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0714%3 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0211%3 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0720%28 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0120%28 Jun →
dust21–13-0.0617%28 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0222%27 Jun →
ancient13–2-0.0311%27 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0419%27 Jun →
mirage13–0-0.0130%27 Jun →
dust20–2-0.110%27 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0110%25 Jun →
dust213–20.0228%25 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.0611%25 Jun →
nuke13–80.0513%25 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0911%25 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.0021%24 Jun →
anubis13–20.0322%24 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0410%24 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0514%24 Jun →
inferno12–16-0.0325%24 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0213%24 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.015%24 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.0119%24 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.117%24 Jun →
inferno13–4-0.0124%21 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0117%21 Jun →
nuke13–90.0117%21 Jun →
dust213–70.0820%20 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0016%20 Jun →
ancient13–110.0614%20 Jun →
nuke4–130.1219%20 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0923%12 Apr →
inferno2–13-0.120%12 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.0721%12 Apr →
dust213–80.0036%12 Apr →
dust213–50.0327%6 Apr →
dust213–110.0222%6 Apr →
inferno13–100.029%6 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0134%6 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0913%6 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.047%6 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.089%6 Apr →
inferno13–80.0426%5 Apr →
nuke10–10.0617%5 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0319%4 Apr →
ancient8–130.0018%4 Apr →
vertigo13–30.0655%3 Apr →
inferno13–40.1135%3 Apr →
inferno13–50.2031%3 Apr →
inferno13–80.0227%3 Apr →
vertigo11–20.1422%3 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0512%28 Mar →
vertigo11–13-0.0327%28 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0613%18 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.