God(washed)Ypmu

God(washed)Ypmu — CS2 Stats

LU76561198334959714[U:1:374693986]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

7,004Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,991 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,991 → 2,991
+23Tracked matches · now 7,004
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 61 days played since 1 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,728 +2,097 11 Apr15 Jun · 10 days played
26,63128,728peak 28,72811 Apr15 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,991 +0 30 Aug7 Sept · 3 observations
2,9912,991peak 2,99130 Aug7 Sept
28,728Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,991Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2026-02-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,991
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 9 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGod(washed)YpmuFACEITLevel 10 · 2,991 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,991csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.3pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time532ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 18 Apr
71%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · anubis, 19 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 8 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 19 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
412In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA31191261%0.02
anubisA169756%0.02
dust2C167944%-0.00
mirageB105550%0.01
overpassB84450%0.01
nukeD62433%0.03
cacheS64267%0.04
infernoA53260%0.01
sanctum1010%-0.16
poseidon1010%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,034Matches
52%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
76.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient146957%1.1716.5
Anubis87254%1.1816.3
Dust251648%1.0214.8
Inferno37148%1.1315.6
Overpass25251%1.1316.3
Mirage24244%1.0214.7
Nuke21846%1.1015.0
Train12648%1.1116.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
524msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
52.6%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
15.3%Flash assists
7.89HE damage / grenade
9.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.671% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–14-0.0216%20 Sept
anubis13–80.0318%20 Sept
ancient13–100.0528%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0513%8 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0213%7 Sept
nuke13–50.0753%2 Jul
ancient9–130.0828%28 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0318%23 Jun
dust22–13-0.1140%22 Jun
ancient13–40.0616%20 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0219%17 Jun
dust213–50.0823%15 Jun
cache13–40.0235%11 Jun
overpass10–130.008%28 May
ancient10–13-0.0030%27 May
mirage8–130.0523%26 May
anubis7–130.0116%26 May
cache4–13-0.0712%25 May
cache13–40.068%25 May
dust213–80.0326%25 May
dust213–100.0920%23 May
mirage5–13-0.0223%21 May
inferno14–160.0220%20 May
ancient13–30.0113%20 May
anubis13–110.0525%19 May
inferno19–220.0126%18 May
ancient13–11-0.0320%18 May
dust26–13-0.0636%16 May
anubis13–60.0725%16 May
mirage16–13-0.0119%13 May
anubis13–30.086%13 May
dust213–80.0122%12 May
cache13–60.0725%12 May
ancient13–10-0.0121%10 May
dust210–13-0.0260%9 May
ancient13–6-0.083%9 May
anubis13–160.0020%9 May
ancient13–60.0623%8 May
dust213–40.0019%3 May
cache13–90.0624%28 Apr
ancient13–50.0414%28 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0220%23 Apr
cache9–130.1030%22 Apr
dust27–13-0.0614%22 Apr
anubis4–130.0421%21 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0521%21 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0128%20 Apr
dust210–130.0011%20 Apr
mirage13–100.0819%19 Apr
overpass15–150.0328%19 Apr
dust24–130.0016%19 Apr
anubis13–10.0971%19 Apr
ancient13–50.0820%19 Apr
mirage11–130.0227%19 Apr
ancient13–20.1617%18 Apr
nuke9–130.0727%18 Apr
overpass14–160.0823%18 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0224%18 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0510%18 Apr
dust27–130.0019%17 Apr
ancient13–30.1022%17 Apr
ancient2–40.0138%17 Apr
overpass13–50.0621%17 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0226%16 Apr
dust213–80.0238%16 Apr
mirage11–130.0235%16 Apr
ancient13–60.0423%13 Apr
dust211–13-0.0622%13 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0132%12 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0433%12 Apr
overpass0–13-0.117%12 Apr
ancient10–130.0029%11 Apr
sanctum2–9-0.1636%11 Apr
anubis13–90.0215%11 Apr
anubis13–80.0225%7 Apr
ancient13–60.039%7 Apr
anubis13–9-0.019%3 Apr
nuke8–80.0411%2 Apr
mirage13–50.0626%2 Apr
ancient1–13-0.0319%2 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0516%1 Apr
mirage13–70.0422%31 Mar
ancient13–50.0820%31 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0324%30 Mar
nuke8–130.0114%25 Mar
nuke13–100.0626%24 Mar
ancient13–110.0318%22 Mar
dust213–100.0529%22 Mar
inferno13–60.0410%20 Mar
ancient16–130.0318%8 Mar
overpass13–100.0327%6 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0222%5 Mar
poseidon8–80.0915%3 Mar
overpass16–12-0.0135%1 Mar
ancient16–12-0.0428%25 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0418%22 Feb
ancient6–130.0026%19 Feb
inferno13–30.0119%18 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0031%2 Feb
ancient13–60.0519%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →