s4muel — CS2 Stats

FI76561198333382357[U:1:373116629]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

634Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingAll-Rounder

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver Elite Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49

Positioning46

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–40–11Last 10049%Win rateLLLTWLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–3–1 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

2–6–2 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 666ms

Last 20

7–11–2 · 35% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 663ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim4.9

Utility4.9

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels4.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 677ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9

Positioning4.6

Utility4.9

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time678ms+66ms

first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 678ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%+5.6%

first ⅓ avg 12.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 30 Jun →

42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 30 Jun →

422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 13 May →

13–1Biggest win · mirage, 17 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

Strongest and weakest map need 5+ matches on two different maps — 1 of 4 maps qualify so far.

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	94	47–47	50%	0.01
nuke	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.03
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
cache	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches

50%Win rate

0.90Avg K/D

—ADR

20%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy

32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

75.7%Counter-strafing

11.7°Preaim

677msReaction time

30.2%T opening success

56.2%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

16.6%Flash assists

8.10HE damage / grenade

5.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.2422% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	1–13	-0.08	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	4%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	26%	15 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.09	15%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	15%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	25%	15 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.05	17%	15 May →
cache	13–9	0.00	21%	15 May →
mirage	9–13	0.02	11%	27 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	16%	27 Apr →
mirage	0–13	-0.11	12%	26 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.01	19%	26 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.03	16%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.12	19%	26 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.03	18%	26 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	21%	26 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.11	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.04	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	27%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	13%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–0	0.04	25%	20 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	23%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.11	26%	5 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	18%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.10	18%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	18%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	32%	5 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.09	16%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.05	7%	1 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	18%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.04	12%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	21%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.20	20%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.00	42%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	21%	30 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	14%	30 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	4%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	13%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.02	19%	25 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	7%	25 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.04	16%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.10	13%	25 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.10	24%	25 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.03	13%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	8%	24 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	13%	24 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.01	10%	24 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	17%	24 Jun →
inferno	8–8	-0.04	6%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.04	13%	22 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.12	9%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.07	14%	22 Jun →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	11%	22 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	11%	22 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	5%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	16%	19 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.02	8%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.01	9%	19 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	13%	19 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.14	5%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.02	16%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	14%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	17%	10 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.03	12%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	25%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.03	9%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.16	8%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.04	15%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.00	8%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	10%	9 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.03	21%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.03	25%	9 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	12%	26 May →
mirage	13–5	0.02	8%	26 May →
mirage	9–13	0.03	14%	23 May →
mirage	13–10	0.05	20%	23 May →
mirage	13–7	0.05	19%	23 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	4%	23 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	4%	23 May →
mirage	7–2	0.07	6%	22 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	9%	22 May →
mirage	13–7	0.04	9%	22 May →
mirage	13–2	0.10	9%	22 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	16%	22 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	18%	18 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	5%	18 May →
mirage	13–9	0.02	13%	17 May →
mirage	13–1	0.11	14%	17 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	20%	14 May →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	17%	14 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.02	14%	14 May →
mirage	13–5	0.01	5%	14 May →
mirage	7–13	0.02	6%	13 May →
mirage	10–13	0.01	12%	12 May →
mirage	13–7	0.00	13%	12 May →
mirage	13–7	0.04	11%	12 May →
mirage	13–7	0.02	13%	12 May →
mirage	12–12	0.04	17%	11 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	13%	11 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	13%	11 May →