GiveawaySign In
arab

arab — CS2 Stats

76561198321286134[U:1:361020406]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,829Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,908Top 5% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6360 of 247893 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,943 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,908 +1,503 30 Aug – 26 Sept · 11 days played
24,87726,908peak 26,90830 Aug26 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,943 +0 30 Aug – 22 Sept · 8 observations
1,9431,943peak 1,94330 Aug22 Sept
26,908Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,943Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
10Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,943
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 58 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,908
  • +1,503 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,092 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGarabFACEITLevel 9 · 1,943 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,908 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,943csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning44
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–43–9Last 10048%Win rateLLTLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Last 20

  • 6–11–3 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility3.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.4
Utility3.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time593ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 23 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 25 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 6–1 · nuke, 1 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
2–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB8440–4448%0.00
mirageD61–517%-0.03
cacheS55–0100%0.00
overpass—10–10%-0.05
inferno—11–0100%-0.10
ancient—10–10%-0.05
vertigo—10–10%-0.01
train—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,033Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
80.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9351%0.9114.3
Ancient6658%1.0114.4
Nuke5652%1.0215.1
Anubis5050%0.8813.2
Inferno4042%0.9114.4
Vertigo1839%0.9312.9
Dust21436%1.0116.9
Overpass1346%0.8411.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
593msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
3.99HE damage / grenade
5.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4549 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0619%1 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0618%1 Oct →
overpass12–12-0.0516%1 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0619%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0321%1 Oct →
nuke6–10.1136%1 Oct →
nuke13–60.0324%1 Oct →
nuke9–130.0114%1 Oct →
nuke2–130.014%1 Oct →
nuke7–120.0717%1 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0535%1 Oct →
nuke13–100.0319%30 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0221%30 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0312%30 Sept →
nuke7–4-0.070%30 Sept →
nuke10–130.0120%30 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0222%30 Sept →
nuke12–120.0030%30 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0411%30 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0214%29 Sept →
nuke3–130.0118%29 Sept →
mirage2–110.008%29 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0117%29 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0514%29 Sept →
nuke13–110.0118%29 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0114%29 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0326%28 Sept →
nuke7–130.0131%28 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0023%28 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.036%28 Sept →
nuke13–90.0330%28 Sept →
nuke9–130.0121%28 Sept →
nuke12–120.0212%28 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0512%28 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.080%28 Sept →
nuke8–10.0325%28 Sept →
nuke13–30.0519%28 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0733%28 Sept →
nuke13–50.0129%28 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0217%28 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.028%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0915%28 Sept →
nuke13–20.1032%28 Sept →
nuke13–90.037%28 Sept →
nuke11–130.0328%28 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0225%27 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.1040%27 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0526%27 Sept →
nuke13–50.0911%27 Sept →
cache12–40.0822%27 Sept →
nuke13–60.0612%27 Sept →
nuke3–00.0520%27 Sept →
nuke10–130.0131%26 Sept →
nuke13–30.0734%26 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0035%26 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0517%26 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0010%26 Sept →
cache13–8-0.047%26 Sept →
cache13–110.039%26 Sept →
nuke13–1-0.0130%26 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0221%26 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0224%26 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0820%25 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.0419%25 Sept →
nuke13–30.0243%25 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0120%25 Sept →
nuke12–120.0028%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.0015%25 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0517%25 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0118%25 Sept →
nuke13–60.0017%25 Sept →
nuke13–60.1026%24 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0221%24 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0721%24 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0219%24 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0419%24 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0513%24 Sept →
nuke13–100.0029%24 Sept →
cache13–50.0332%24 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0435%24 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0511%24 Sept →
nuke13–40.1325%24 Sept →
nuke13–30.0122%24 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0311%24 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0120%23 Sept →
train13–1-0.0214%23 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0121%23 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.009%23 Sept →
nuke8–130.0723%23 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0813%23 Sept →
nuke13–40.0221%23 Sept →
nuke13–30.1431%23 Sept →
nuke13–70.0226%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.0433%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.1129%23 Sept →
nuke13–80.0218%23 Sept →
nuke11–130.0324%23 Sept →
nuke13–60.1031%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.0215%22 Sept →
nuke13–80.0520%22 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Related

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other gameseDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPIcm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turnResolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutionsCrosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-upModel AccuracyPrediction model accuracy statsTeam Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utilityCS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGLCS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem