ℳ.Ị.₷.₮.

ℳ.Ị.₷.₮. — CS2 Stats

76561198320807562[U:1:360541834]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,467Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,414Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16085 of 223129 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 7 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,414 -1,511 7 Aug15 Sept · 22 days played
24,26628,472peak 28,4727 Aug15 Sept
28,472Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-08-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,058 below peak (28,472)
  • -1,066 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,586 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGℳ.Ị.₷.₮.FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER25,414 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning64
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateLWWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility3.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.4
Utility3.9
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time568ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 26 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 15 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 17 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC37152241%0.01
dust2S2617965%0.04
infernoD113827%0.02
cacheC94544%0.03
ancientD62433%0.01
anubisS64267%0.02
nukeC52340%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

156Matches
48%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
86.5%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
560msReaction time
46.9%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
7.14HE damage / grenade
6.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4409 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–130.0021%15 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0116%15 Sept
ancient13–70.0741%14 Sept
cache16–13-0.0221%14 Sept
dust213–30.0314%14 Sept
dust210–13-0.0127%12 Sept
dust214–16-0.0221%12 Sept
dust213–5-0.0218%12 Sept
mirage13–11-0.020%6 Sept
cache7–13-0.0525%6 Sept
inferno14–160.0421%5 Sept
mirage13–10.0818%5 Sept
dust213–40.1026%5 Sept
anubis13–100.0125%31 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0318%30 Aug
inferno12–160.0126%30 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0220%29 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0227%29 Aug
dust211–130.0722%29 Aug
mirage13–70.0122%28 Aug
dust213–8-0.0137%28 Aug
inferno13–70.0412%28 Aug
mirage10–130.0126%28 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0427%26 Aug
mirage13–40.0441%26 Aug
dust213–60.1525%26 Aug
anubis13–70.0618%26 Aug
nuke8–130.0521%26 Aug
dust28–130.0022%26 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0020%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0232%23 Aug
dust213–80.0325%23 Aug
nuke8–130.0118%21 Aug
cache9–130.0138%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0010%21 Aug
anubis13–40.0316%21 Aug
mirage11–130.0317%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0723%17 Aug
mirage13–30.0435%17 Aug
dust213–70.0029%17 Aug
nuke9–130.0330%16 Aug
dust213–90.0424%16 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0133%16 Aug
anubis13–40.0432%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0317%16 Aug
inferno5–130.0124%16 Aug
cache10–130.1113%16 Aug
mirage6–130.0421%16 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0643%15 Aug
nuke13–50.0625%15 Aug
inferno13–110.0027%15 Aug
nuke13–100.0429%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0317%15 Aug
dust213–6-0.0026%15 Aug
mirage10–130.0525%15 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0336%15 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0221%15 Aug
cache2–130.0643%15 Aug
mirage13–90.0633%14 Aug
cache13–110.1130%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0426%14 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0140%14 Aug
dust213–90.0636%14 Aug
mirage5–130.0532%14 Aug
inferno9–130.0932%14 Aug
dust213–90.0426%14 Aug
dust210–130.0334%13 Aug
mirage16–130.1123%13 Aug
dust213–80.1137%13 Aug
inferno15–150.0723%13 Aug
dust213–40.0630%13 Aug
dust28–130.0323%11 Aug
mirage13–70.0233%11 Aug
dust213–40.0824%11 Aug
mirage13–70.0435%11 Aug
ancient11–130.0715%11 Aug
mirage13–60.0232%11 Aug
mirage15–150.0630%11 Aug
inferno13–60.0323%11 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0217%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0321%11 Aug
dust213–110.0716%11 Aug
mirage13–40.0419%11 Aug
cache13–11-0.0125%11 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0613%10 Aug
mirage13–60.0316%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0229%10 Aug
dust27–130.0517%10 Aug
inferno12–160.0338%10 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0638%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0329%10 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0124%10 Aug
dust213–100.0516%10 Aug
cache13–110.0624%9 Aug
dust213–60.0224%9 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0223%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0417%9 Aug
cache2–13-0.0119%9 Aug
mirage11–130.0621%9 Aug
mirage8–130.0825%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →