McLovin⭕⃤ ✘_ ✘

McLovin⭕⃤ ✘_ ✘ — CS2 Stats

76561198320587285[U:1:360321557]Steam profile ↗

3,195Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
FaceitLevel 4 · 981 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMcLovin⭕⃤ ✘_ ✘FACEITLevel 4 · 981 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning49
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57358Last 10057%Win rateLWWWTLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.5
Aggression6.9
Utility5.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning4.9
Utility5.8
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact8.8

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time593ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–8
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 51% over 35
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35181751%0.01
infernoA2012860%0.02
nukeB179853%0.03
mirageS1713476%0.05
vertigoS65183%0.03
anubis3030%-0.00
office1010%-0.04
ancient1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (51% over 35). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

312Matches
48%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
76.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8855%1.1114.9
Inferno4637%0.9414.4
Vertigo3661%1.0814.4
Ancient3546%1.0515.2
Nuke3450%1.1216.6
Dust23438%1.1315.8
Anubis2548%1.1215.4
Overpass1242%0.9713.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
66.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
588msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.87HE damage / grenade
12.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2887% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0514%28 Aug
nuke11–20.0532%28 Aug
inferno13–90.0514%27 Aug
mirage13–30.1410%27 Aug
dust212–12-0.0821%27 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0220%25 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.0413%23 Aug
dust213–70.0311%23 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0917%23 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0316%23 Aug
anubis10–130.0220%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0418%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0818%14 Aug
vertigo13–30.1313%14 Aug
nuke8–130.0916%13 Aug
mirage13–30.1013%13 Aug
dust213–110.0013%12 Aug
office5–13-0.0417%11 Aug
nuke13–60.1416%10 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0710%10 Aug
dust213–80.0433%10 Aug
dust212–120.0218%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.0324%9 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0422%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0619%9 Aug
dust211–13-0.0221%9 Aug
vertigo13–20.0315%9 Aug
dust213–9-0.0426%8 Aug
mirage12–120.0918%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0122%8 Aug
inferno13–6-0.029%8 Aug
dust28–30.1413%8 Aug
dust213–80.0319%7 Aug
dust213–100.036%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.0030%4 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0123%4 Aug
inferno10–130.0613%3 Aug
vertigo13–100.0014%3 Aug
inferno13–80.0431%2 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0323%2 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0115%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0921%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0122%2 Aug
dust23–13-0.0314%2 Aug
dust212–12-0.0117%2 Aug
dust213–90.0318%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0221%1 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0219%1 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0424%1 Aug
dust28–130.0322%1 Aug
mirage13–80.1517%26 Jul
dust213–30.0513%21 Jul
dust210–130.0322%20 Jul
inferno13–00.1119%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0114%19 Jul
dust212–12-0.0119%18 Jul
nuke11–130.1316%18 Jul
dust213–50.0410%14 Jul
inferno13–40.0015%13 Jul
dust210–130.0115%13 Jul
nuke13–30.1016%13 Jul
mirage13–110.0718%12 Jul
vertigo8–130.0914%12 Jul
nuke8–130.1013%11 Jul
mirage8–130.0923%11 Jul
dust213–11-0.0518%9 Jul
inferno1–130.0110%9 Jul
inferno13–20.0224%5 Jul
nuke5–130.0315%5 Jul
inferno5–130.0415%5 Jul
dust213–110.0110%5 Jul
inferno13–60.1017%5 Jul
mirage13–70.0120%5 Jul
dust212–120.1016%5 Jul
mirage13–60.0516%4 Jul
ancient11–13-0.014%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0816%3 Jul
dust212–120.0217%3 Jul
inferno13–50.0614%3 Jul
dust211–130.0116%3 Jul
nuke13–60.0528%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0713%1 Jul
dust213–20.0110%1 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0221%30 Jun
dust28–130.0116%30 Jun
dust213–80.0116%29 Jun
dust27–130.0216%29 Jun
inferno9–130.0016%29 Jun
dust213–30.0519%29 Jun
mirage13–40.0822%28 Jun
dust213–10.0017%28 Jun
nuke11–130.008%28 Jun
nuke2–0-0.010%28 Jun
inferno13–100.039%28 Jun
inferno13–70.0514%28 Jun
dust213–100.0123%28 Jun
anubis10–130.0414%28 Jun
dust213–90.0112%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.013%27 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0116%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →