✪DRAKE

✪DRAKE — CS2 Stats

BY76561198318546996[U:1:358281268]Steam profile ↗

877Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,594Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1264 of 17951 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,408 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪DRAKEFACEITLevel 10 · 2,408 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,594 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning52
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52426Last 10052%Win rateWTLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0
Aggression9.4
Utility2.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.2
Utility2.8
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time554ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy25.6%+6.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 24nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA42231955%0.01
dust2A2415963%0.01
infernoC135838%0.01
nukeD72529%0.05
ancientA53260%-0.01
anubis42250%0.00
cache31233%-0.01
office21150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,488Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
84.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22257%1.2317.9
Dust211950%1.0816.5
Ancient8355%0.9815.8
Inferno4052%1.0116.9
Nuke4045%1.0416.9
Anubis2544%0.9015.2
Overpass1547%1.0216.5
Train450%0.5813.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
541msReaction time
35.3%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.54HE damage / grenade
1.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3486 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.2539% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0729%23 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0439%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0024%20 Aug
dust20–3-0.0050%20 Aug
nuke3–130.0333%17 Aug
mirage9–130.0020%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0225%15 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0414%15 Aug
mirage0–4-0.0250%14 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0416%14 Aug
anubis4–130.0320%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0115%12 Aug
dust213–7-0.0120%12 Aug
nuke13–30.1728%9 Aug
mirage12–120.0327%9 Aug
dust213–80.1147%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0012%8 Aug
ancient7–130.0120%7 Aug
inferno8–130.0235%6 Aug
ancient11–60.0132%6 Aug
mirage13–80.0913%4 Aug
mirage13–20.0927%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0326%2 Aug
dust211–130.0538%2 Aug
nuke13–60.0825%31 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0322%31 Jul
mirage16–130.0314%30 Jul
mirage13–70.0621%30 Jul
cache16–130.0417%30 Jul
nuke11–130.0330%29 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0111%29 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0126%29 Jul
dust213–10-0.0622%29 Jul
nuke7–130.0214%29 Jul
anubis8–130.0024%28 Jul
inferno13–60.0513%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0224%27 Jul
inferno2–130.0015%27 Jul
dust213–60.0223%27 Jul
office8–130.0517%27 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0327%27 Jul
dust21–10.0133%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0410%23 Jul
mirage13–110.0313%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0121%22 Jul
dust210–13-0.0622%19 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0117%19 Jul
ancient13–10.0132%19 Jul
office13–50.0337%19 Jul
inferno13–100.0126%18 Jul
dust24–130.0112%18 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0317%18 Jul
cache5–10-0.0632%18 Jul
mirage13–90.0616%17 Jul
dust213–30.0121%17 Jul
mirage12–120.0415%15 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0323%15 Jul
dust24–0-0.040%15 Jul
mirage12–120.0817%14 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0940%14 Jul
anubis13–110.000%14 Jul
mirage13–100.0724%13 Jul
dust25–130.0030%13 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0214%13 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0018%12 Jul
inferno3–130.0136%12 Jul
mirage2–00.0067%12 Jul
ancient13–40.018%12 Jul
dust216–140.0422%11 Jul
mirage13–110.0433%11 Jul
dust213–8-0.0514%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0122%11 Jul
mirage13–00.1332%11 Jul
dust213–100.0112%10 Jul
dust213–40.0433%10 Jul
nuke11–130.0524%10 Jul
inferno8–130.0124%10 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0120%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0521%10 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0220%10 Jul
inferno13–70.0518%9 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0411%9 Jul
dust213–90.1335%9 Jul
mirage9–130.0329%8 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0519%7 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0112%6 Jul
cache3–13-0.0115%6 Jul
mirage13–9-0.029%4 Jul
mirage13–70.0021%1 Jul
dust20–13-0.057%29 Jun
mirage10–130.0418%10 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0118%10 Jun
mirage13–3-0.010%3 Jun
dust213–70.1023%31 May
mirage10–130.0325%31 May
mirage9–13-0.0119%28 May
mirage9–13-0.0114%27 May
mirage12–120.0513%26 May
mirage13–80.0612%25 May
dust29–13-0.0220%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →