morgonbånge #guccigang

morgonbånge #guccigang — CS2 Stats

PM76561198310239940[U:1:349974212]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,622Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,855 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,855 → 1,855
+3Tracked matches · now 1,622
−3.4ppWin rate · 34.5% → 31.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 16 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,014 +1,409 28 Oct12 Jun · 11 days played
21,50324,364peak 24,36428 Oct12 Jun
24,587Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,855Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2025-10-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,855
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 146 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-11
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmorgonbånge #guccigangFACEITLevel 9 · 1,855 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,855csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning35
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD405010Last 10040%Win rateLWLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility4.9
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning3.5
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time549ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 8–2 · office, 6 Nov
55%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · poseidon, 15 May
375msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 31 Oct
13–0Biggest win · train, 5 Nov

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheD1541127%0.01
overpassA159660%0.03
mirageC145936%0.01
ancientC145936%-0.00
nukeS118373%0.04
infernoD91811%-0.01
anubisB63350%-0.02
trainD62433%0.02
dust22020%-0.02
sanctum110100%-0.05
poseidon1010%-0.18
stronghold1010%-0.02
alpine110100%0.02
italy1010%0.12
office110100%0.22
palacio1010%-0.03
agency1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

175Matches
61%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
84.8ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
34%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1984%1.3018.8
Ancient1675%1.3515.2
Mirage1656%1.3017.6
Overpass1267%1.4017.0
Train1155%1.0414.7
Inferno667%1.2114.0
Anubis250%1.1821.5
Vertigo1100%1.5018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.9%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
544msReaction time
24.7%T opening success
33.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
7.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.6522% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–130.0935%12 Sept
nuke13–40.1117%12 Sept
dust26–130.0420%12 Sept
cache4–13-0.0237%31 Jul
mirage16–130.0325%31 Jul
inferno4–130.0030%28 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0119%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0127%28 Jun
overpass7–130.0520%28 Jun
mirage3–130.0413%28 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0726%12 Jun
mirage13–100.0239%12 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0718%12 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0422%12 Jun
cache13–110.0026%12 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0338%12 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0115%12 Jun
mirage9–130.0019%12 Jun
inferno13–40.1518%17 May
ancient10–130.0220%17 May
mirage10–13-0.0414%17 May
cache4–130.0022%17 May
cache0–13-0.0630%17 May
cache6–130.0223%17 May
inferno8–8-0.0119%17 May
ancient11–13-0.0417%15 May
nuke13–10.0616%15 May
overpass13–7-0.0113%15 May
sanctum9–3-0.0521%15 May
poseidon2–9-0.1855%15 May
cache13–70.0443%3 May
cache12–120.0223%3 May
mirage12–16-0.0318%3 May
cache13–110.0523%2 May
cache11–13-0.0618%2 May
cache13–90.0923%2 May
cache12–120.0214%2 May
cache12–12-0.058%2 May
stronghold9–13-0.0213%1 May
alpine8–20.0213%1 May
cache7–13-0.0610%1 May
cache9–13-0.0022%1 May
ancient9–13-0.0213%8 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0514%8 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0615%3 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0114%3 Apr
nuke13–70.0228%3 Apr
ancient13–100.0119%3 Apr
overpass13–60.0526%25 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0113%25 Mar
inferno3–9-0.1827%25 Mar
mirage15–150.0235%23 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0118%23 Mar
overpass13–60.0423%23 Mar
anubis12–16-0.0213%1 Mar
overpass13–90.0419%1 Mar
anubis13–10.0121%27 Feb
nuke13–90.0715%27 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0216%27 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0313%27 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0617%27 Feb
nuke13–40.0621%27 Feb
overpass16–140.0522%14 Dec
train6–13-0.0110%14 Dec
nuke13–110.0015%6 Dec
inferno14–16-0.0420%5 Dec
mirage13–90.0227%5 Dec
ancient13–80.0719%5 Dec
ancient6–130.0428%28 Nov
train10–130.028%28 Nov
nuke9–130.0916%28 Nov
nuke13–6-0.0123%15 Nov
overpass13–90.0625%15 Nov
mirage13–60.0317%14 Nov
dust25–13-0.0716%14 Nov
nuke15–150.0218%14 Nov
train12–120.0513%14 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0124%14 Nov
mirage3–13-0.0518%14 Nov
nuke14–160.0320%8 Nov
nuke16–13-0.0418%6 Nov
ancient13–110.0218%6 Nov
italy12–120.1221%6 Nov
office8–20.2236%6 Nov
train13–00.0925%5 Nov
inferno6–130.0019%5 Nov
overpass10–130.0521%5 Nov
overpass14–160.0421%2 Nov
ancient13–110.0125%2 Nov
overpass13–40.0120%2 Nov
mirage13–30.050%31 Oct
train13–10-0.0413%28 Oct
inferno8–80.0722%26 Oct
train0–00.000%24 Oct
overpass4–20.1325%24 Oct
ancient8–13-0.0522%18 Oct
overpass13–110.0326%18 Oct
mirage9–130.0619%16 Oct
palacio8–13-0.0319%16 Oct
agency3–130.0342%16 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →