rasp™

rasp™ — CS2 Stats

76561198308627940[U:1:348362212]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

515Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating9,120Light Blue band · top ~59.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+574Premier CS Rating · 8,546 → 9,120
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 14 days played since 5 Sep 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,120 +549 5 Sept18 Sept · 14 days played
7,6719,134peak 9,1345 Sept18 Sept
9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
14Days played since 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 14 below peak (9,134)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 880 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrasp™FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER9,120 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning63
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46504Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLLLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −93ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim3.9
Utility2.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch8.0

Limited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning6.3
Utility2.9
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time576ms+32ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 12 Sept
40%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · inferno, 10 Sept
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 17 Sept
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
29In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2213959%0.00
ancientD1851328%-0.01
dust2C146843%0.00
anubisS139469%0.03
mirageC114736%0.01
infernoD113827%0.02
cacheA95456%0.01
train1010%-0.08
poseidon110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
50%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
70.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%0.8012.0
Ancient250%0.8814.5
Nuke1100%1.4217.0
Dust210%0.509.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
28.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.2%Spray accuracy
66.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
585msReaction time
59.0%T opening success
42.3%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
6.25HE damage / grenade
3.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4096 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0216%18 Sept
ancient6–13-0.1016%18 Sept
anubis13–80.048%18 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0012%18 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0225%17 Sept
dust25–13-0.0810%17 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0313%17 Sept
cache13–100.0920%17 Sept
train12–12-0.0821%17 Sept
mirage13–70.1114%17 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0115%17 Sept
dust212–16-0.0314%17 Sept
ancient13–70.0419%17 Sept
dust213–70.0012%17 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0522%17 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0114%17 Sept
cache13–70.0117%16 Sept
anubis13–70.1124%16 Sept
ancient13–10-0.029%16 Sept
nuke13–40.0228%16 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0220%16 Sept
anubis13–30.0113%16 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0315%16 Sept
dust26–13-0.0523%16 Sept
dust213–11-0.0324%16 Sept
ancient6–130.0418%16 Sept
dust213–100.0615%16 Sept
cache4–13-0.0711%16 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0222%16 Sept
ancient10–13-0.067%16 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0123%16 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0217%15 Sept
nuke10–130.086%15 Sept
cache9–13-0.0525%15 Sept
nuke16–130.0215%15 Sept
inferno13–40.0921%15 Sept
anubis13–100.0614%15 Sept
dust213–70.0326%15 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0224%15 Sept
inferno6–130.0116%15 Sept
nuke13–30.0315%14 Sept
mirage6–13-0.1016%14 Sept
anubis11–130.0516%14 Sept
dust211–130.0323%14 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0019%14 Sept
anubis13–90.0316%14 Sept
nuke14–16-0.0315%14 Sept
dust20–3-0.0411%14 Sept
cache13–50.0925%14 Sept
ancient13–50.0623%13 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0315%13 Sept
inferno9–130.0119%13 Sept
ancient6–13-0.057%13 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0321%13 Sept
nuke13–60.0113%13 Sept
cache3–13-0.0424%13 Sept
nuke4–13-0.088%12 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0210%12 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0418%12 Sept
anubis13–40.1411%12 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0221%12 Sept
anubis13–30.0519%12 Sept
inferno5–130.019%12 Sept
mirage8–130.0225%11 Sept
nuke10–130.0012%11 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0328%11 Sept
dust22–13-0.0114%11 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0122%11 Sept
mirage13–70.0717%11 Sept
inferno8–80.0340%10 Sept
dust210–130.0924%10 Sept
anubis16–13-0.0210%10 Sept
poseidon9–50.0531%10 Sept
inferno9–50.0215%10 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0127%10 Sept
nuke13–30.1024%10 Sept
dust213–5-0.0320%10 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0311%10 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0220%10 Sept
nuke13–60.0717%9 Sept
cache13–50.0022%9 Sept
inferno13–90.0218%9 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0418%9 Sept
nuke13–160.0411%9 Sept
ancient12–160.0216%8 Sept
inferno11–130.0718%8 Sept
cache8–130.0024%8 Sept
mirage4–130.0117%8 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0124%8 Sept
nuke13–70.0216%8 Sept
cache16–140.0410%8 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0211%8 Sept
mirage15–150.0416%8 Sept
nuke8–13-0.059%7 Sept
ancient13–160.0113%7 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0613%6 Sept
nuke13–80.0122%6 Sept
dust213–70.0711%6 Sept
dust28–130.0321%6 Sept
ancient6–130.0625%5 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →