✪ Lil DOBBY ✈ — CS2 Stats

CR76561198306617094[U:1:346351366]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

660Tracked matches74%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating13,688Blue band · top ~35.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#18131 of 27186 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning58

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateWWLLTWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4

Aggression8.1

Utility3.9

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning5.8

Utility3.9

Mechanics7.5

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time644ms−4ms

first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms

Headshot accuracy20.0%−0.8%

first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 9–2

13–0Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	20	11–9	55%	0.00
inferno	B	19	10–9	53%	0.03
dust2	S	14	10–4	71%	0.02
nuke	C	14	5–9	36%	0.02
ancient	A	10	6–4	60%	0.00
cache	S	8	6–2	75%	0.02
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	0.02
vertigo	—	4	1–3	25%	0.02
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.05
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07
fachwerk	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

53Matches

47%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

87.6ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	10	50%	1.21	16.7
Anubis	4	25%	0.87	15.3
Dust2	3	100%	1.94	19.7
Nuke	3	33%	1.04	13.0
Ancient	3	67%	1.49	15.7
Inferno	2	50%	1.04	19.5
Cache	2	0%	0.90	13.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

29.0%Spray accuracy

83.9%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

629msReaction time

35.6%T opening success

47.5%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

6.0%Flash assists

6.84HE damage / grenade

6.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4722 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.5647% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–9	-0.04	22%	26 Aug →
dust2	9–3	-0.01	17%	26 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.06	22%	11 Aug →
nuke	8–8	-0.06	11%	10 Aug →
inferno	9–5	-0.04	14%	10 Aug →
nuke	9–2	0.19	16%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	24%	4 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	-0.00	38%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.06	18%	3 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	7%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.08	25%	3 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.00	21%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.01	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	22%	2 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.05	20%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.07	28%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	33%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.04	23%	2 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.08	12%	31 Jul →
inferno	3–7	0.05	21%	31 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.03	11%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	21%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.11	13%	31 Jul →
inferno	7–0	0.06	14%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.08	24%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	22%	30 Jul →
office	7–13	0.07	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	8–3	0.03	9%	30 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.04	18%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	29%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.08	17%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.06	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.04	31%	29 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.02	23%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.13	28%	29 Jul →
cache	10–1	0.09	10%	29 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	19%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	18%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.07	15%	28 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	16%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.01	27%	27 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.01	30%	27 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.00	21%	27 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	22%	27 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.11	20%	27 Jul →
dust2	0–2	-0.04	33%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	24%	27 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	18%	27 Jul →
fachwerk	13–9	0.00	19%	27 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.08	23%	26 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.03	14%	24 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.09	27%	24 Jul →
nuke	2–6	0.03	25%	24 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.02	22%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.03	23%	23 Jul →
overpass	13–9	0.07	24%	23 Jul →
ancient	1–8	0.03	6%	23 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.03	14%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.05	14%	23 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	16%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.09	15%	23 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.12	12%	23 Jul →
overpass	3–9	-0.18	17%	23 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	21%	22 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	32%	22 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.06	24%	22 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	28%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	28%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.05	20%	21 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.04	14%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.17	25%	21 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	18%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	37%	21 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	18%	20 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	6%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–1	-0.02	14%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	17%	20 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	18%	20 Jul →
nuke	6–9	-0.09	25%	18 Jul →
overpass	7–9	-0.04	22%	18 Jul →
inferno	2–10	-0.06	31%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.05	22%	17 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.03	21%	16 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.01	17%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.08	32%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	10%	16 Jul →
cache	13–2	-0.03	23%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	19%	16 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	26%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	21%	15 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.03	29%	15 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	10%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.06	13%	15 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.00	12%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.11	22%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.00	21%	14 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	11%	13 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	28%	13 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.11	28%	13 Jul →