zerk — CS2 Stats

76561198304843733[U:1:344578005]

1,799Tracked matches27%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,974Purple band · top ~24.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25550 of 44548 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,281 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzerkFACEITLevel 6 · 1,281 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,974 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning45
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38611Last 10038%Win rateLLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.2
Aggression4.3
Utility4.3
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch1.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 47 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning4.5
Utility4.3
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time598ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy28.0%−7.1%
first ⅓ avg 35.1% → last ⅓ avg 28.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — cache 3–0
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 10nukeWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28131546%-0.01
ancientC1881044%-0.02
cacheC145936%-0.01
dust2B136746%-0.02
anubisB105550%-0.02
nukeD7070%-0.01
infernoD61517%-0.02
vertigo4040%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

471Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
74.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6452%0.9916.0
Anubis3757%0.9714.9
Vertigo3361%1.1615.7
Ancient2730%0.8714.0
Nuke2040%0.9615.9
Dust21958%0.9014.5
Cache838%0.8813.9
Inferno425%1.0318.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.5%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
609msReaction time
24.5%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
8.62HE damage / grenade
5.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.4503% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.0016%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0150%29 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0427%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.0137%29 Aug
anubis5–130.0234%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0335%29 Aug
cache11–13-0.0223%29 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0532%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0950%28 Aug
inferno3–130.0139%28 Aug
cache5–13-0.0131%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0539%28 Aug
mirage6–130.0320%28 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0624%23 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0115%23 Aug
cache13–16-0.0125%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0527%23 Aug
dust219–16-0.0322%23 Aug
vertigo1–13-0.0815%22 Aug
cache13–7-0.0331%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0510%22 Aug
inferno0–6-0.100%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.0332%22 Aug
anubis13–60.0133%22 Aug
nuke4–130.0441%22 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0839%22 Aug
cache3–13-0.1133%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0125%22 Aug
cache13–8-0.0232%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0430%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0015%21 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0011%21 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0528%21 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0238%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0416%21 Aug
ancient7–2-0.0518%21 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0631%21 Aug
mirage13–110.0111%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0540%16 Aug
cache13–30.0141%16 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0918%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.0542%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0733%16 Aug
dust213–5-0.0522%16 Aug
vertigo3–130.0233%16 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0417%16 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0515%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0417%16 Aug
mirage4–130.0131%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.0650%14 Aug
dust26–13-0.0542%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0346%13 Aug
ancient4–13-0.099%13 Aug
mirage10–130.0021%8 Aug
mirage20–22-0.0117%8 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0330%8 Aug
cache13–60.0028%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0322%8 Aug
dust213–30.1035%7 Aug
cache9–130.1053%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0516%7 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0325%2 Aug
anubis13–60.0218%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0424%2 Aug
ancient13–80.0230%2 Aug
mirage13–30.0731%1 Aug
mirage13–100.0236%1 Aug
mirage13–70.0154%1 Aug
ancient13–110.0538%1 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0441%31 Jul
nuke4–130.0442%31 Jul
cache3–00.1160%31 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0117%31 Jul
dust213–90.0236%31 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0126%26 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0232%26 Jul
cache8–13-0.0065%26 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0756%24 Jul
ancient13–100.0339%24 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0325%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0423%24 Jul
dust213–20.0543%23 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0625%22 Jul
ancient6–130.0118%22 Jul
dust22–13-0.0929%22 Jul
anubis15–150.0017%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0545%22 Jul
cache8–13-0.0140%22 Jul
mirage13–00.000%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0142%18 Jul
nuke11–130.0128%18 Jul
cache3–13-0.0333%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.0832%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0450%17 Jul
mirage16–140.0422%17 Jul
ancient13–30.0330%17 Jul
mirage14–160.0130%11 Jul
vertigo0–13-0.0754%10 Jul
inferno13–20.0735%10 Jul
ancient10–130.0133%6 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →