Tannie Mara Leuwes Van Strydom — CS2 Stats

76561198304671379[U:1:344405651]✓ No bans

1,909Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,592Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,263Purple band · top ~15.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5899 of 10844 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate37.1%48.1%10.9% short
Shot accuracy4.6%12.9%8.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.881.080.20 short
Match win rate42.1%46.5%4.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTannie Mara Leuwes Van St…PREMIER18,263 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning56
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53452Last 10053%Win rateWLWLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression7.8
Utility1.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.6
Utility1.5
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time513ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–5
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
1111In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A22121055%0.01
anubisA1912763%-0.01
mirageD1551033%-0.01
ancientS1510567%-0.02
nukeB147750%-0.01
cacheC94544%-0.02
infernoB63350%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,589Lifetime kills
0.88K/D
3,528Matches
42.1%Match win rate
37.1%Headshot %
4.6%Shot accuracy
5,880MVPs
1,312Hours (in match)
3,789Bombs planted
571Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,033
AUG7,153
SG 5536,292
AWP4,182
P2501,065
MP9915

Lifetime map wins

5,599dust2
4,521inferno
3,833nuke
809train
482vertigo
160cbble
30ar_shoots
28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
86.7%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
515msReaction time
29.8%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.13Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
9.95HE damage / grenade
0.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1336 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8139% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0113%27 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0313%27 Aug
nuke13–20.0725%27 Aug
mirage6–130.0619%25 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0119%25 Aug
mirage8–130.0220%24 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0426%22 Aug
dust210–130.0514%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0422%22 Aug
cache13–80.0127%21 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0620%21 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0218%21 Aug
mirage8–130.0115%21 Aug
anubis13–70.0827%21 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0018%19 Aug
dust28–130.0219%18 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0113%18 Aug
cache8–13-0.0217%17 Aug
nuke13–110.0821%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0614%17 Aug
anubis13–160.0619%17 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0413%15 Aug
anubis13–50.0026%15 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0215%15 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0412%14 Aug
dust213–50.0919%14 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0412%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0415%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.0119%14 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0323%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0015%14 Aug
cache4–13-0.0722%13 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0518%12 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0725%12 Aug
dust214–160.0116%12 Aug
mirage3–11-0.0715%12 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0624%9 Aug
dust213–20.0619%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.079%9 Aug
nuke4–13-0.1029%9 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0520%9 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0225%9 Aug
anubis13–90.0519%9 Aug
dust213–40.0821%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0019%7 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0121%7 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0314%7 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0219%7 Aug
nuke7–130.019%7 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0210%7 Aug
cache7–13-0.0114%6 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0411%6 Aug
nuke13–5-0.039%5 Aug
ancient13–60.0343%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0117%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0214%4 Aug
dust214–160.0120%4 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0617%3 Aug
dust29–13-0.0120%3 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0019%3 Aug
dust213–5-0.0721%2 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0313%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0313%2 Aug
anubis16–12-0.0410%1 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0114%1 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0030%1 Aug
mirage13–50.1210%1 Aug
dust213–60.0217%1 Aug
ancient13–50.0316%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0325%31 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0011%31 Jul
cache13–9-0.0219%31 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0214%31 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0310%31 Jul
cache13–70.0529%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0427%31 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0515%31 Jul
dust27–13-0.0317%31 Jul
cache5–13-0.046%31 Jul
anubis13–60.0112%31 Jul
dust213–110.0017%31 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0223%31 Jul
dust213–80.0217%31 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0515%28 Jul
inferno13–60.0021%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0518%26 Jul
dust211–13-0.0413%26 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0311%25 Jul
nuke13–10.0722%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0116%25 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0222%25 Jul
ancient10–130.0119%25 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0215%25 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0714%24 Jul
cache13–3-0.0123%24 Jul
inferno3–130.0013%24 Jul
anubis13–100.0213%24 Jul
dust213–100.0022%24 Jul
dust213–11-0.0117%24 Jul
dust213–80.0014%24 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →