WassuPMikäDiili

WassuPMikäDiili — CS2 Stats

FI76561198303189307[U:1:342923579]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,745Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,375Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#85319 of 232081 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,675 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 10 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,375 +2,847 2 Aug18 Sept · 32 days played
16,52820,113peak 20,1132 Aug18 Sept
20,466Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,675Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-07-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,675
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 76 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 738 below peak (20,113)
  • -449 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 625 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWassuPMikäDiiliFACEITLevel 8 · 1,675 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,375 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,675csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning59
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52453Last 10052%Win rateLWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility7.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.83 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.9
Utility7.5
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time545ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 21 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · mirage, 16 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · anubis, 25 Jul
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16infernoWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21101148%0.02
dust2B189950%0.01
nukeS1611569%0.01
anubisB158753%0.01
infernoC146843%-0.00
cacheC94544%0.03
ancientA74357%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,345Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
78.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust217655%1.2215.9
Nuke16657%1.1015.4
Inferno15353%1.1316.2
Ancient14653%1.2016.8
Mirage14634%0.9813.7
Anubis12150%1.1115.9
Overpass4652%1.0714.3
Vertigo3444%1.1014.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
27.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.6%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
537msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
48.7%CT opening success
0.83Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
10.22HE damage / grenade
19.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8576% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–13-0.1013%18 Sept
dust213–10-0.0218%18 Sept
ancient13–60.0326%18 Sept
dust27–130.0227%17 Sept
mirage13–60.0318%16 Sept
mirage13–00.0229%16 Sept
dust213–10-0.0225%15 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0027%15 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0311%13 Sept
inferno13–50.0419%13 Sept
dust212–160.0526%12 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0417%11 Sept
inferno13–40.0732%11 Sept
mirage10–130.0218%6 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0218%5 Sept
cache10–13-0.0624%5 Sept
anubis16–120.0420%5 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0316%1 Sept
mirage13–80.0711%1 Sept
dust210–130.0625%30 Aug
nuke11–130.0422%30 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0231%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0229%29 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0417%26 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0518%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0012%26 Aug
ancient9–130.0012%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.0223%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0535%23 Aug
nuke13–80.0733%23 Aug
inferno13–20.0114%23 Aug
nuke13–80.0228%23 Aug
anubis13–80.0223%23 Aug
dust210–130.0424%23 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0313%23 Aug
mirage13–10.1325%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0523%21 Aug
cache13–20.3128%21 Aug
ancient15–150.0915%19 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0724%18 Aug
cache5–13-0.0519%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0229%17 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0120%17 Aug
dust213–60.1015%16 Aug
mirage13–100.064%16 Aug
dust213–80.0522%16 Aug
anubis13–5-0.013%15 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0417%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0320%15 Aug
nuke15–150.0218%15 Aug
dust213–10-0.0114%15 Aug
nuke13–70.0620%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.0312%14 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0219%14 Aug
anubis13–160.0113%14 Aug
cache13–80.0419%13 Aug
mirage6–130.0320%12 Aug
nuke13–6-0.035%11 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0213%11 Aug
dust213–30.0517%11 Aug
mirage14–160.0116%10 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0920%9 Aug
dust213–6-0.0013%9 Aug
nuke13–110.0418%9 Aug
inferno13–100.0024%9 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0212%7 Aug
dust213–6-0.0129%7 Aug
nuke13–20.0721%6 Aug
mirage13–20.0128%6 Aug
nuke13–110.0319%5 Aug
inferno11–130.0517%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0515%4 Aug
anubis7–130.0218%3 Aug
anubis13–90.0616%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0423%2 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0225%29 Jul
cache13–80.0320%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0318%28 Jul
cache9–13-0.0418%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0529%26 Jul
nuke13–110.0024%26 Jul
inferno8–13-0.020%25 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0417%25 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0318%22 Jul
anubis14–160.0819%20 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0336%16 Jul
anubis1–8-0.0215%15 Jul
anubis9–130.0611%15 Jul
mirage13–30.1610%15 Jul
nuke4–13-0.073%14 Jul
nuke13–50.0532%14 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0022%14 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0215%13 Jul
cache8–13-0.0313%12 Jul
mirage10–130.0312%12 Jul
dust27–130.0220%11 Jul
cache13–160.0120%11 Jul
mirage11–130.0110%11 Jul
cache13–50.0624%10 Jul
anubis13–60.0827%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →