sens

sens — CS2 Stats

RU76561198302272530[U:1:342006802]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,839Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,562Top 1% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1694 of 247947 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,839 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,562 +246 22 Jul – 27 Sept · 18 days played
28,15930,674peak 30,67422 Jul27 Sept
Faceit ELO: 3,053 +0 29 Aug – 27 Sept · 6 observations
3,0533,053peak 3,05329 Aug27 Sept
30,674Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,053Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-07-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,053
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 447 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,112 below peak (30,674)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,438 to go
  • Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsensPREMIER28,562 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,053csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning62
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD65–30–5Last 10065%Win rateWWLLLTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.11 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 363ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility5.5
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time477ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 502ms → last ⅓ avg 477ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%−12.1%
first ⅓ avg 34.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 30 Jul →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · cache, 22 Jul →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 30 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 29 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 100% over 5mirageWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD217–1433%0.04
cacheS2017–385%0.07
dust2S1411–379%0.05
ancientA127–558%-0.00
anubisA95–456%0.02
nukeA85–363%0.05
infernoS64–267%0.06
vertigoS55–0100%0.11
train—22–0100%0.00
office—11–0100%0.02
boulder—11–0100%0.02
shelter—10–10%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,546Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
85.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage93847%1.0015.8
Ancient80856%1.1517.5
Dust278954%1.1617.6
Anubis60050%1.0716.5
Nuke10643%0.9315.5
Train7244%0.9816.3
Inferno5531%0.8714.3
Vertigo5535%0.9415.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
5.7°Preaim
491msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
60.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
8.97HE damage / grenade
9.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.6131% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0334%8 Aug →
train13–10-0.0754%8 Aug →
ancient0–20.000%8 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0123%8 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.1024%7 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0236%7 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0816%6 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0815%6 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0027%5 Aug →
ancient0–5-0.090%4 Aug →
cache13–100.0731%3 Aug →
dust213–90.1321%3 Aug →
cache13–110.0327%3 Aug →
inferno11–130.0918%3 Aug →
anubis6–130.0433%3 Aug →
mirage13–90.0321%3 Aug →
mirage10–130.0823%2 Aug →
ancient13–60.0120%2 Aug →
dust22–00.1125%2 Aug →
cache13–60.1124%2 Aug →
inferno13–80.0412%2 Aug →
mirage11–130.0813%2 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0310%2 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0212%2 Aug →
anubis13–90.0227%2 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0143%2 Aug →
nuke13–90.0922%2 Aug →
cache13–2-0.0026%1 Aug →
ancient13–20.0116%1 Aug →
ancient13–30.0226%1 Aug →
mirage7–130.0721%1 Aug →
ancient13–60.0616%1 Aug →
cache16–140.0727%1 Aug →
dust213–50.0827%1 Aug →
nuke13–90.1127%1 Aug →
cache12–120.0322%1 Aug →
anubis13–100.0518%31 Jul →
dust213–40.0337%31 Jul →
vertigo13–20.0645%31 Jul →
anubis8–130.0140%31 Jul →
cache13–100.0526%31 Jul →
mirage13–30.2129%30 Jul →
anubis13–60.0428%30 Jul →
cache12–120.0642%30 Jul →
office13–70.0221%30 Jul →
vertigo13–70.1721%30 Jul →
dust213–70.0650%30 Jul →
anubis13–100.0719%30 Jul →
ancient10–130.0318%30 Jul →
cache13–100.1323%30 Jul →
nuke13–00.036%29 Jul →
inferno13–30.1028%29 Jul →
dust213–2-0.0124%29 Jul →
vertigo8–20.0110%29 Jul →
vertigo13–40.1318%29 Jul →
dust211–130.1117%29 Jul →
cache13–30.1148%29 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0625%29 Jul →
nuke9–130.0120%29 Jul →
cache13–90.1631%29 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0026%28 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0052%28 Jul →
anubis13–50.0539%28 Jul →
train13–70.0735%28 Jul →
cache13–70.0927%28 Jul →
mirage8–130.0520%27 Jul →
vertigo13–100.1526%27 Jul →
nuke13–30.0746%27 Jul →
mirage13–40.1518%27 Jul →
mirage15–150.0930%27 Jul →
nuke7–130.1133%27 Jul →
dust213–50.1240%27 Jul →
mirage8–130.0244%27 Jul →
ancient7–130.0171%26 Jul →
dust216–120.0324%26 Jul →
mirage13–80.0647%25 Jul →
inferno13–70.1532%25 Jul →
ancient13–60.0419%25 Jul →
nuke10–130.0540%25 Jul →
mirage11–130.0426%25 Jul →
cache13–60.0832%25 Jul →
cache13–100.0224%24 Jul →
cache13–10.0527%24 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.030%24 Jul →
boulder13–40.0225%24 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0753%24 Jul →
mirage8–130.1120%24 Jul →
cache13–110.0423%24 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0114%24 Jul →
cache13–70.0820%24 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0033%23 Jul →
dust213–110.1140%23 Jul →
mirage5–130.0137%23 Jul →
cache13–70.1140%22 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0643%22 Jul →
cache4–00.18100%22 Jul →
anubis2–13-0.0239%22 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0223%22 Jul →
shelter8–130.0853%22 Jul →
mirage9–130.1026%22 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.