Aisle 5 Predator

Aisle 5 Predator — CS2 Stats

76561198301455422[U:1:341189694]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

908Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,407Light Blue band · top ~72.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,407 -1,139 6 Jul – 8 Oct · 5 days played
5,5207,546peak 7,5466 Jul8 Oct
7,546Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-07-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,139 below peak (7,546)
  • -1,139 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 3,593 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAisle 5 PredatorFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER6,407 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning74
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–51–7Last 10042%Win rateWLWTLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.0
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning7.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels8.8
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time663ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 663ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 15 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · cache, 29 Aug →
469msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 19 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 29 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 44% over 16anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3011–1937%-0.01
mirageC219–1243%0.00
nukeC167–944%-0.01
cacheC114–736%-0.01
anubisD72–529%0.01
inferno—42–250%0.03
office—33–0100%-0.02
train—31–233%-0.02
ancient—21–150%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.09
boulder—11–0100%0.03
warden—11–0100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

97Matches
49%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
—ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
43.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
659msReaction time
69.9%T opening success
60.2%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
5.00HE damage / grenade
4.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0220%8 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.035%8 Oct →
inferno13–90.0619%8 Oct →
mirage15–150.014%6 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.018%1 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.026%1 Oct →
nuke2–4-0.180%29 Sept →
nuke13–110.1111%29 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0217%29 Sept →
dust213–50.0316%28 Sept →
mirage13–90.057%28 Sept →
mirage12–120.0113%27 Sept →
dust213–10.0119%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.048%27 Sept →
nuke13–60.0221%27 Sept →
nuke5–130.0120%23 Sept →
nuke13–60.0619%19 Sept →
dust27–130.0213%19 Sept →
cache7–130.099%19 Sept →
inferno10–130.0220%17 Sept →
dust29–130.0319%16 Sept →
cache3–11-0.0717%15 Sept →
office13–6-0.0426%15 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0712%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0220%15 Sept →
nuke13–30.1424%15 Sept →
mirage16–140.0920%13 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0116%12 Sept →
anubis13–80.0414%11 Sept →
mirage13–10.1133%11 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0124%11 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0219%11 Sept →
dust213–100.0914%11 Sept →
office13–50.0024%10 Sept →
nuke2–130.0122%10 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0811%10 Sept →
dust23–3-0.0913%10 Sept →
mirage10–30.0220%10 Sept →
overpass4–13-0.0911%10 Sept →
mirage13–50.0425%10 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0213%10 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0210%9 Sept →
mirage12–120.0114%9 Sept →
dust213–30.1030%9 Sept →
cache12–12-0.059%9 Sept →
dust20–9-0.0614%9 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.058%9 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0217%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0131%4 Sept →
anubis12–120.0519%29 Aug →
cache13–00.0145%29 Aug →
ancient13–10.027%29 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0410%29 Aug →
train10–13-0.028%29 Aug →
nuke1–9-0.1127%29 Aug →
dust213–60.0622%29 Aug →
inferno7–130.0315%27 Aug →
mirage16–130.0211%27 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0612%27 Aug →
train13–11-0.0213%26 Aug →
mirage2–130.0212%25 Aug →
dust29–130.0023%25 Aug →
cache5–130.0616%25 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0730%19 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0725%19 Aug →
dust28–110.0218%13 Aug →
train12–12-0.0324%12 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0323%11 Aug →
nuke13–30.0110%11 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0410%11 Aug →
anubis13–40.0320%11 Aug →
mirage13–20.0816%11 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0211%11 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0517%5 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0730%5 Aug →
dust25–13-0.115%5 Aug →
cache13–60.0324%29 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.1119%28 Jul →
cache8–3-0.0016%24 Jul →
dust27–13-0.1216%24 Jul →
anubis1–13-0.030%24 Jul →
anubis6–130.0615%24 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0222%24 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0515%18 Jul →
dust212–12-0.0711%18 Jul →
boulder13–60.0317%18 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0713%18 Jul →
cache5–13-0.060%18 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0132%15 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.027%15 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.100%12 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0312%12 Jul →
warden13–5-0.0432%7 Jul →
dust216–140.0218%6 Jul →
dust22–130.0426%6 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0418%6 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.082%6 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0719%6 Jul →
mirage3–130.0729%6 Jul →
office13–10-0.0136%4 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.