onic

onic — CS2 Stats

UA76561198300474132[U:1:340208404]Steam profile ↗

4,077Tracked matches77%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#16737 of 20725 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

3,442Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,442
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 58 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGonicPEAK ELO3,442csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning54
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6139Last 10061%Win rateWWWWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression6.1
Utility7.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.4
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time488ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 497ms → last ⅓ avg 488ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–1
130Biggest win — mirage
12Longest win streak
W5Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 20mirageWeakest map · 45% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA26161062%0.01
mirageB22101245%-0.00
dust2S2015575%0.01
anubisB105550%-0.03
nukeS107370%-0.01
overpassB84450%-0.01
cache440100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,678Matches
53%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
82.1ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage73557%1.1516.1
Ancient70856%1.1115.7
Anubis50257%1.1316.3
Dust234552%1.1716.9
Nuke13859%1.1314.8
Vertigo8847%1.0615.3
Train5860%1.0214.7
Inferno3751%1.0413.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
487msReaction time
27.1%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
18.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.0428%27 Aug
cache16–13-0.0155%27 Aug
dust213–80.0938%22 Aug
ancient19–170.0526%18 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0627%17 Aug
ancient4–13-0.017%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0338%15 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0321%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0233%9 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0321%9 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0818%9 Aug
cache13–7-0.0230%9 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0324%9 Aug
ancient13–60.0118%7 Aug
mirage13–60.0224%7 Aug
mirage13–00.0414%7 Aug
ancient13–10.1631%7 Aug
mirage13–90.0027%11 Jul
dust213–90.0110%11 Jul
ancient13–60.0439%10 Jul
dust213–4-0.0219%10 Jul
dust213–9-0.028%9 Jul
ancient13–40.0536%9 Jul
mirage11–130.0229%28 Jun
dust213–100.0133%28 Jun
ancient13–80.0924%28 Jun
overpass13–80.0211%28 Jun
nuke13–40.0325%27 Jun
anubis19–16-0.009%27 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0015%27 Jun
dust213–50.0411%26 Jun
anubis13–90.0018%26 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0322%26 Jun
dust216–120.0726%26 Jun
overpass14–16-0.059%26 Jun
ancient16–130.0220%25 Jun
dust210–13-0.0022%25 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0130%25 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0517%24 Jun
nuke17–190.0327%24 Jun
dust213–20.0113%23 Jun
overpass13–90.0318%23 Jun
ancient8–130.0023%20 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0622%20 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0318%20 Jun
dust213–10.0426%18 Jun
nuke13–70.0025%18 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0617%30 May
ancient8–13-0.0128%24 May
nuke13–6-0.0218%24 May
mirage14–16-0.0322%24 May
ancient13–100.0522%23 May
mirage13–50.1017%23 May
dust29–130.0120%23 May
mirage9–130.0221%23 May
overpass13–14-0.0610%23 May
anubis13–4-0.0440%23 May
overpass19–15-0.0122%22 May
mirage13–50.0624%22 May
nuke7–130.0231%22 May
dust213–11-0.0121%22 May
mirage10–13-0.0215%22 May
dust213–100.0016%22 May
overpass5–13-0.0015%22 May
mirage13–6-0.0226%22 May
ancient5–13-0.0130%21 May
ancient13–10-0.069%21 May
mirage13–16-0.0310%21 May
mirage13–10.0120%21 May
cache13–80.0134%28 Apr
cache13–30.0426%28 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0815%15 Apr
ancient11–130.0323%10 Apr
nuke13–90.0220%6 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0627%5 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0326%5 Apr
ancient13–110.0521%5 Apr
dust213–9-0.0047%4 Apr
ancient3–13-0.076%4 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0414%4 Apr
dust27–130.0120%31 Mar
anubis8–13-0.089%31 Mar
overpass13–110.0415%31 Mar
anubis11–130.0010%30 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0315%30 Mar
dust213–6-0.0027%30 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0619%30 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0630%30 Mar
mirage13–20.0322%29 Mar
ancient16–140.0214%29 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0513%29 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0114%29 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0312%25 Mar
dust212–16-0.0622%25 Mar
dust213–100.0219%24 Mar
ancient19–150.0323%21 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0010%19 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0227%19 Mar
dust213–70.0526%19 Mar
ancient13–30.0035%17 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →