Gundersen

Gundersen — CS2 Stats

76561198296731663[U:1:336465935]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

827Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,584Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#34142 of 238117 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 827 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 2 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,584 +1,133 2 Apr21 Sept · 20 days played
18,70523,584peak 23,5842 Apr21 Sept
23,944Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2026-04-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,584
  • +1,344 over 30 days · improving
  • +4,879 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,416 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGundersenPREMIER23,584 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57367Last 10057%Win rateLLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time579ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.39Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 9 Apr
75%Best headshot accuracy · 0–7 · mirage, 28 May
336msFastest reaction time · 6–2 · overpass, 5 Apr
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 29 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L3Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5overpassWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB178947%0.03
dust2A1610663%0.00
ancientS1611569%-0.00
anubisS129375%0.01
nukeA106460%0.02
mirageC94544%0.01
infernoS54180%0.09
overpassC52340%-0.04
office3030%-0.00
vertigo21150%-0.02
stronghold110100%0.13
warden1010%0.04
alpine110100%0.06
sanctum1010%0.02
train1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

195Matches
57%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
80.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
41%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3776%1.1914.3
Anubis1979%0.9615.3
Vertigo956%1.0216.9
Overpass862%1.1014.4
Nuke560%1.1316.4
Dust2475%1.0614.8
Mirage3100%1.2215.0
Cache367%1.2114.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
579msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
4.54HE damage / grenade
9.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7547% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0814%18 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0729%18 Sept
dust24–13-0.0420%18 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0524%18 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0422%18 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.0117%12 Sept
cache9–130.0322%5 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0325%4 Sept
cache16–120.0019%3 Sept
cache13–4-0.0010%3 Sept
dust215–15-0.0233%3 Sept
nuke10–130.0014%2 Sept
anubis11–130.0128%2 Sept
inferno13–100.0118%28 Aug
ancient13–30.0719%28 Aug
anubis13–20.0518%10 Aug
cache9–130.0221%10 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0321%6 Aug
anubis13–70.0025%31 Jul
anubis13–10.0429%30 Jul
nuke13–20.0118%30 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0029%30 Jul
cache10–13-0.0031%29 Jul
ancient13–00.1223%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0330%29 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1420%18 Jul
dust213–60.0031%18 Jul
ancient13–20.0232%18 Jul
cache7–130.0026%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0234%13 Jul
cache13–80.1931%13 Jul
dust210–130.0330%13 Jul
anubis13–50.0730%13 Jul
stronghold13–60.1324%30 Jun
warden6–130.0420%30 Jun
cache13–70.0623%30 Jun
office12–120.0122%30 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0315%29 Jun
mirage13–90.1119%29 Jun
inferno13–50.0423%28 Jun
nuke13–60.0019%28 Jun
nuke13–50.0013%28 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0230%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.0013%27 Jun
nuke13–20.1223%26 Jun
dust28–13-0.0120%26 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0420%26 Jun
cache13–70.1430%25 Jun
office12–12-0.0323%16 Jun
dust213–60.0418%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0720%5 Jun
nuke13–100.1022%4 Jun
mirage0–7-0.0575%28 May
mirage12–160.0523%27 May
ancient7–13-0.0615%27 May
anubis13–110.0225%27 May
anubis13–7-0.0431%27 May
dust28–130.0830%26 May
ancient13–7-0.0113%26 May
mirage13–90.0525%22 May
inferno13–110.0421%22 May
overpass11–13-0.0026%13 May
cache13–70.0822%13 May
cache8–130.0126%13 May
anubis13–8-0.0023%12 May
cache13–60.0420%12 May
cache13–50.0124%5 May
cache12–120.0235%5 May
cache8–13-0.0526%5 May
mirage9–130.0437%24 Apr
alpine13–110.0634%24 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0223%24 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0318%24 Apr
mirage13–80.0429%24 Apr
dust213–100.0033%24 Apr
mirage13–3-0.0423%19 Apr
ancient13–3-0.0767%18 Apr
dust216–12-0.0616%16 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0221%16 Apr
anubis16–14-0.0130%16 Apr
ancient13–50.0919%15 Apr
dust216–130.0029%15 Apr
office12–120.0224%15 Apr
sanctum8–80.0230%9 Apr
inferno9–10.3931%9 Apr
anubis11–130.0418%8 Apr
dust28–130.0432%8 Apr
dust216–14-0.0322%8 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0127%5 Apr
overpass6–2-0.100%5 Apr
dust213–90.0521%5 Apr
overpass13–16-0.0323%5 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0424%4 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0423%4 Apr
dust213–110.0321%3 Apr
nuke12–120.0025%3 Apr
ancient13–70.0317%2 Apr
nuke13–30.0814%2 Apr
train5–13-0.0423%2 Apr
vertigo13–3-0.0317%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →