ggonçalves_

ggonçalves_ — CS2 Stats

SD76561198292619216[U:1:332353488]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

531Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,901Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,666Top 50% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91619 of 261493 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 531 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,666 -3,388 23 Apr – 10 Nov · 11 days played
19,66623,749peak 23,74923 Apr10 Nov
23,873Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2025-04-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,083 below peak (23,749)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 334 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate41.5%46.8%48.2%6.7% short
Shot accuracy13.2%13.0%13.2%meets
Kill/death ratio1.041.061.070.03 short
Match win rate47.0%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGggonçalves_FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,666 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning64
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWLTLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time552ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 27 Jun →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · mirage, 9 May →
383msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 17 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 19 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 25ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2516–964%0.04
anubisC135–838%0.01
infernoA138–562%0.06
dust2B126–650%-0.01
ancientD93–633%0.02
cacheA95–456%0.03
nukeB84–450%0.02
trainA53–260%0.02
vertigo—32–167%0.04
overpass—22–0100%0.07
grail—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,645Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
4,692Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
41.5%Headshot %
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13,431MVPs
1,901Hours (in match)
3,872Bombs planted
1,374Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,360
AWP12,976
FAMAS1,994
SSG 081,491
Knife1,481

Lifetime map wins

8,128dust2
4,542inferno
1,640vertigo
1,496nuke
1,444train
719cbble
85office
82lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

238Matches
58%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
88.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3644%1.1817.8
Dust22544%1.1416.7
Ancient2162%1.3418.1
Anubis2162%1.3418.1
Nuke967%1.4119.1
Inferno956%1.3718.6
Train2100%0.8919.5
Cache250%1.7321.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
538msReaction time
44.6%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
11.19HE damage / grenade
12.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–130.0312%4 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0315%31 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0223%31 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0133%31 Jul →
mirage16–120.0217%29 Jul →
ancient16–140.039%29 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0219%28 Jul →
dust28–130.0227%28 Jul →
train13–6-0.0233%28 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0212%27 Jul →
ancient10–130.0513%26 Jul →
nuke10–2-0.0118%26 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0815%25 Jul →
nuke6–50.0418%25 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0236%25 Jul →
train8–130.0914%24 Jul →
anubis13–60.1027%22 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0610%22 Jul →
ancient15–150.0521%21 Jul →
mirage9–130.0621%21 Jul →
mirage13–10.1021%19 Jul →
anubis13–90.0218%18 Jul →
inferno13–100.0620%18 Jul →
mirage13–80.0314%18 Jul →
vertigo13–10.0611%18 Jul →
inferno5–130.0226%17 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0116%17 Jul →
anubis3–130.0116%13 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0132%13 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0226%12 Jul →
ancient6–130.0423%12 Jul →
cache11–130.0821%10 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0526%10 Jul →
mirage13–60.0719%28 Jun →
inferno13–70.0314%28 Jun →
overpass13–10.0721%27 Jun →
inferno13–60.1729%27 Jun →
vertigo13–60.1317%27 Jun →
dust210–130.0335%26 Jun →
inferno13–10.1115%26 Jun →
inferno13–50.0442%15 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0213%13 Jun →
overpass13–80.0722%12 Jun →
ancient6–130.0320%12 Jun →
dust216–13-0.0520%12 Jun →
vertigo4–13-0.0733%11 Jun →
mirage13–90.0917%11 Jun →
mirage13–100.029%10 Jun →
train10–130.0124%10 Jun →
nuke13–30.1539%10 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0115%10 Jun →
ancient11–130.0419%9 Jun →
mirage13–10.1022%9 Jun →
inferno13–50.0420%9 Jun →
anubis13–90.1417%7 Jun →
mirage13–50.0818%7 Jun →
mirage13–30.0223%7 Jun →
mirage11–130.0921%6 Jun →
train13–30.0927%6 Jun →
cache13–70.0818%6 Jun →
inferno10–130.1311%6 Jun →
mirage1–13-0.0217%5 Jun →
cache13–90.0124%5 Jun →
nuke5–10.0614%5 Jun →
cache13–110.1431%5 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0211%4 Jun →
cache13–80.0728%4 Jun →
mirage13–60.0823%4 Jun →
anubis9–130.0118%3 Jun →
cache7–130.0315%26 May →
ancient13–30.0111%25 May →
inferno9–130.1129%25 May →
mirage13–40.0546%9 May →
anubis13–80.097%28 May →
mirage9–130.0323%27 May →
mirage13–50.0911%16 May →
inferno13–50.1524%16 May →
dust210–13-0.0210%16 May →
dust219–170.0321%15 May →
grail4–13-0.0520%9 May →
dust210–130.0021%6 May →
nuke13–160.0126%2 May →
dust216–140.0126%2 May →
anubis0–13-0.0919%2 May →
mirage3–13-0.0817%1 May →
nuke9–13-0.058%1 May →
inferno9–130.0113%1 May →
dust213–8-0.0427%27 Apr →
mirage9–130.0321%26 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0530%26 Apr →
nuke15–150.0214%26 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0218%25 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0714%24 Apr →
mirage13–40.1013%24 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0115%24 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0428%23 Apr →
train13–10-0.0522%23 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0511%23 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0225%23 Apr →
mirage13–100.0528%19 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.