pl4stic7aste

pl4stic7aste — CS2 Stats

KI76561198292197687[U:1:331931959]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

417Tracked matches29%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,763Blue band · top ~35% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 417 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 24 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,763 -35 26 Jun20 Sept · 22 days played
13,25916,844peak 16,84426 Jun20 Sept
17,105Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-06-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,081 below peak (16,844)
  • +277 over 30 days · steady
  • -35 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,237 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpl4stic7asteFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER13,763 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning50
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43516Last 10043%Win rateLTWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 4142 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility3.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time574ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–11 · anubis, 12 Jul
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · office, 18 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 28 Jul
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 20 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
23In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D1551033%-0.02
ancientA149564%0.01
cacheS139469%-0.00
infernoC125742%-0.00
anubisC114736%-0.00
officeD93633%0.02
nukeC83538%0.01
mirageD81713%0.00
vertigoD51420%0.01
italy21150%0.02
train1010%-0.01
shelter110100%-0.04
overpass110100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches
45%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
57.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis475%0.9011.0
Nuke367%0.607.0
Inferno20%0.498.0
Cache1100%1.1011.0
Mirage10%0.4513.0
Dust21100%0.738.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
576msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.80HE damage / grenade
3.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.362 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5113% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo7–13-0.079%11 Sept
anubis12–12-0.0219%8 Sept
cache13–80.039%8 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0117%1 Sept
inferno13–60.0214%25 Aug
cache4–130.0520%24 Aug
inferno7–13-0.030%24 Aug
ancient8–130.0119%7 Aug
ancient8–130.0016%6 Aug
office9–130.0420%5 Aug
inferno9–130.0316%5 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0412%5 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0120%5 Aug
office9–13-0.0223%5 Aug
dust27–13-0.0120%3 Aug
office13–70.0828%1 Aug
office13–30.0216%31 Jul
nuke7–130.0322%31 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0214%31 Jul
inferno3–13-0.085%31 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0311%31 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0312%30 Jul
train4–13-0.0124%30 Jul
mirage6–13-0.029%30 Jul
dust213–10-0.0120%30 Jul
cache13–7-0.0310%30 Jul
anubis10–130.1113%28 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0511%28 Jul
ancient13–50.075%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0022%26 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0114%26 Jul
cache13–3-0.0323%25 Jul
dust27–13-0.0319%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0428%25 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0215%25 Jul
cache13–70.0312%25 Jul
anubis13–9-0.018%24 Jul
dust27–130.0122%24 Jul
office6–13-0.0624%20 Jul
dust28–13-0.0613%20 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0114%20 Jul
vertigo13–00.066%20 Jul
office13–40.0267%18 Jul
mirage14–16-0.038%15 Jul
dust25–13-0.006%15 Jul
inferno8–20.0919%15 Jul
cache6–13-0.036%15 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0441%14 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0920%14 Jul
cache13–60.0120%14 Jul
dust27–13-0.0013%13 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0310%13 Jul
office10–130.0125%12 Jul
anubis13–110.1417%12 Jul
dust23–130.0512%12 Jul
nuke13–70.0424%12 Jul
ancient13–40.0421%12 Jul
nuke13–90.0522%12 Jul
cache13–40.0015%12 Jul
ancient9–130.0122%12 Jul
nuke11–130.0024%10 Jul
cache13–60.0616%10 Jul
dust22–8-0.0131%10 Jul
italy13–4-0.0024%8 Jul
ancient13–90.0432%8 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0119%8 Jul
dust213–10-0.0518%7 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0013%7 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0219%7 Jul
cache13–9-0.0111%7 Jul
dust213–9-0.0515%7 Jul
office7–130.0913%5 Jul
dust213–8-0.0411%4 Jul
vertigo12–120.0116%4 Jul
vertigo6–130.0512%4 Jul
dust22–13-0.0618%4 Jul
dust213–100.0320%4 Jul
office8–13-0.0418%3 Jul
inferno15–150.009%3 Jul
ancient13–60.0115%3 Jul
anubis13–50.039%3 Jul
overpass13–4-0.048%3 Jul
mirage13–60.0716%3 Jul
mirage6–130.0412%2 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0216%2 Jul
anubis10–13-0.086%1 Jul
cache5–13-0.058%1 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0920%1 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0126%1 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0413%28 Jun
cache12–12-0.0110%28 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0022%27 Jun
italy6–130.0517%27 Jun
cache13–11-0.0215%27 Jun
anubis13–8-0.019%27 Jun
vertigo10–130.0121%27 Jun
mirage10–130.0713%26 Jun
nuke13–90.0418%26 Jun
inferno13–30.066%24 Jun
ancient13–50.0818%24 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →