Shrimp Skampi

Shrimp Skampi — CS2 Stats

76561198291524607[U:1:331258879]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

859Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,831Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8410 of 27333 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShrimp SkampiFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,831 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning44
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression4.4
Utility4.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time615ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — ancient 13–4
131Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
L6Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 59% over 17infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC27111641%-0.01
anubisB2091145%-0.01
nukeC1881044%-0.02
ancientA1710759%-0.02
infernoD93633%-0.02
dust2A74357%0.00
mirage220100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

154Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
79.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache4856%1.0915.5
Ancient3345%1.0014.9
Anubis2658%0.9816.4
Nuke1331%0.7414.5
Dust21346%1.1317.3
Inferno1136%0.7412.1
Mirage667%1.1516.0
Vertigo450%0.8113.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
605msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
9.75HE damage / grenade
8.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.77% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–130.0114%28 Aug
anubis11–130.0621%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.0518%23 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0818%23 Aug
dust23–13-0.0834%22 Aug
cache5–130.0717%22 Aug
dust213–100.0214%22 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0813%22 Aug
cache13–20.0216%22 Aug
ancient13–60.0327%22 Aug
cache5–13-0.087%19 Aug
cache13–50.0719%19 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0616%18 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0220%17 Aug
cache9–13-0.0124%16 Aug
cache3–13-0.0513%15 Aug
cache5–13-0.0822%15 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0220%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0320%15 Aug
ancient4–130.0244%15 Aug
cache8–130.0116%15 Aug
nuke13–100.0010%13 Aug
anubis25–23-0.0115%10 Aug
dust213–30.0727%10 Aug
ancient4–13-0.079%10 Aug
cache8–13-0.0715%9 Aug
cache13–10-0.0111%4 Aug
cache13–110.0420%4 Aug
anubis6–13-0.049%4 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0310%4 Aug
anubis13–90.0218%2 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0521%2 Aug
anubis19–16-0.0216%1 Aug
cache13–7-0.0119%1 Aug
cache5–13-0.0115%31 Jul
anubis9–130.0217%31 Jul
cache5–13-0.078%31 Jul
nuke15–150.0119%30 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0414%30 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0621%30 Jul
cache5–13-0.069%30 Jul
ancient16–130.0518%30 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0517%30 Jul
inferno6–10-0.039%29 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0217%28 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0417%28 Jul
anubis9–13-0.089%27 Jul
nuke15–150.0224%27 Jul
anubis13–60.0218%27 Jul
ancient4–6-0.0413%26 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0121%26 Jul
ancient6–2-0.0329%26 Jul
cache13–6-0.038%26 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0616%26 Jul
cache13–4-0.0321%26 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0412%25 Jul
cache13–90.0313%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.0318%25 Jul
inferno13–70.0112%25 Jul
anubis13–60.0517%25 Jul
nuke13–90.0020%25 Jul
anubis10–130.0013%24 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0221%24 Jul
nuke15–150.0519%24 Jul
ancient13–16-0.039%24 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0126%23 Jul
cache13–70.0123%23 Jul
cache10–13-0.049%23 Jul
nuke10–13-0.018%22 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0018%22 Jul
nuke10–13-0.068%21 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0115%20 Jul
cache8–130.0018%19 Jul
cache13–40.0123%19 Jul
anubis13–10.009%19 Jul
anubis13–90.0113%18 Jul
cache10–130.0018%18 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0713%18 Jul
inferno13–100.0212%18 Jul
anubis10–130.0524%18 Jul
dust23–10.0425%18 Jul
inferno5–13-0.129%18 Jul
cache14–16-0.0514%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0121%18 Jul
nuke13–60.0015%18 Jul
dust27–40.0312%18 Jul
nuke6–13-0.077%18 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0522%18 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0215%16 Jul
nuke13–11-0.049%16 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0018%16 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0512%15 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0024%15 Jul
cache8–13-0.0226%15 Jul
anubis15–150.0219%15 Jul
ancient13–40.1017%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0321%11 Jul
inferno15–150.0714%11 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0721%11 Jul
cache13–70.0417%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →