Snoozy

Snoozy — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198286090748[U:1:325825020]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

406Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,337Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#82141 of 226977 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 20 Jul 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,514 +2,859 20 Jul18 Oct · 27 days played
16,65521,041peak 21,04120 Jul18 Oct
21,145Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-07-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches7
Win rate29%
K/D0.74
Headshot %67%

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.9%42.7%43.8%1.9% short
Shot accuracy14.3%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.001.02above
Match win rate41.0%43.9%44.7%3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnoozyFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning53
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.3
Utility3.6
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time555ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy31.2%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 28.8% → last ⅓ avg 31.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–11 · cache, 23 Aug
56%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 18 Oct
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 13 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 18 Oct

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 34ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA34201459%-0.00
dust2A25141156%0.00
infernoC1661038%-0.02
ancientD92722%-0.02
overpassC73443%0.01
nuke43175%-0.00
cache32167%0.05
train2020%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,378Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,797Matches
41.0%Match win rate
41.9%Headshot %
14.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
12,951MVPs
1,952Hours (in match)
4,279Bombs planted
1,161Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP19,836
AK-4718,149
P903,508
SSG 082,865
P2502,862
Tec-92,535

Lifetime map wins

20,994dust2
2,978inferno
485vertigo
421cbble
313nuke
237safehouse
229bank
177train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
99.3ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10%1.6725.0
Ancient10%0.397.0
Dust21100%0.447.0
Overpass1100%1.9121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

31.3%Headshot accuracy
30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.2%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
547msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
60.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
9.43HE damage / grenade
5.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2547% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0626%18 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0047%18 Sept
mirage13–70.0528%17 Sept
dust25–13-0.0442%16 Sept
dust26–13-0.0231%15 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0521%13 Sept
dust213–9-0.0323%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0525%9 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0322%7 Sept
cache13–60.0220%7 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0132%7 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0633%6 Sept
dust213–90.0116%6 Sept
mirage13–80.0825%6 Sept
inferno5–4-0.0521%30 Aug
inferno7–130.0343%24 Aug
cache13–110.1024%23 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0123%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0827%16 Aug
cache9–130.0243%16 Aug
mirage13–70.0320%3 Aug
dust210–13-0.0225%23 Jun
mirage4–130.0148%4 Jan
dust24–130.0056%18 Oct
dust213–20.0540%18 Oct
ancient11–13-0.0652%12 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0347%11 Sept
mirage13–80.0232%11 Sept
overpass13–40.0928%27 Aug
dust213–110.0330%27 Aug
mirage11–130.0025%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0330%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0325%16 Aug
inferno13–50.0328%16 Aug
mirage13–20.0323%16 Aug
mirage13–110.0120%14 Aug
train7–13-0.0345%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0132%14 Aug
dust213–50.0639%14 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0627%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0429%13 Aug
dust211–130.0244%12 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0227%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0542%12 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0422%12 Aug
dust213–80.0120%12 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0334%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0529%9 Aug
overpass13–80.0323%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0220%9 Aug
inferno8–130.0543%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0825%8 Aug
mirage13–30.0038%8 Aug
ancient3–130.0232%7 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0725%6 Aug
ancient16–120.0126%6 Aug
nuke13–30.0227%6 Aug
dust213–6-0.0124%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0133%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0123%6 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0328%5 Aug
dust213–80.0035%5 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0424%5 Aug
overpass5–13-0.0422%4 Aug
mirage13–80.0333%4 Aug
dust24–13-0.0436%4 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0028%2 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0417%2 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0534%1 Aug
dust216–13-0.0423%1 Aug
dust213–110.0227%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0128%30 Jul
dust211–130.0028%30 Jul
nuke16–120.0526%30 Jul
dust213–60.0331%30 Jul
dust28–13-0.0648%29 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0121%29 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0428%29 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0527%29 Jul
dust212–16-0.0124%26 Jul
overpass2–13-0.0124%26 Jul
ancient13–50.0729%26 Jul
mirage13–90.0542%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0313%26 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0817%25 Jul
inferno10–130.0132%23 Jul
dust213–90.0128%23 Jul
mirage13–40.0823%22 Jul
ancient2–4-0.0433%22 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0230%22 Jul
dust215–150.0525%22 Jul
overpass10–130.0433%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0423%22 Jul
dust213–100.0530%22 Jul
dust213–90.0349%22 Jul
inferno13–80.0425%21 Jul
mirage15–150.0028%21 Jul
train14–160.0338%20 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0128%20 Jul
inferno7–130.0035%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →