CrucifixNz

CrucifixNz — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198285335698[U:1:325069970]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,257Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,282Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#58936 of 226459 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−12Premier CS Rating · 21,294 → 21,282
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 16 days played since 26 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,282 +1,589 26 Aug18 Sept · 16 days played
19,69321,412peak 21,41226 Aug18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 743 +0 31 Aug18 Sept · 3 observations
743743peak 74331 Aug18 Sept
21,412Peak Premier in tracked matches
743Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
16Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 743
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 8 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 130 below peak (21,412)
  • +1,589 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,718 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCrucifixNzPREMIER21,282 · Pink bandPEAK ELO743csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning67
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5248Last 10052%Win rateWLWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility3.8
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.7
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time537ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 6 Sept
47%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 16 Sept
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 17 Sept
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8mirageWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2415963%0.00
mirageD1741324%-0.02
ancientA1710759%0.03
anubisC167944%-0.00
infernoA159660%0.02
nukeS86275%0.01
cache31233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

142Matches
51%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
70.7ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4549%0.9513.3
Dust24262%0.9614.7
Inferno2055%1.1317.4
Ancient1729%0.8413.9
Cache743%0.9215.4
Nuke560%0.8513.2
Anubis425%0.9012.3
Vertigo10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
536msReaction time
44.7%T opening success
59.6%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.16HE damage / grenade
7.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3518 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0523%18 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0129%18 Sept
dust213–10-0.0126%17 Sept
cache9–130.0729%17 Sept
anubis13–80.0725%17 Sept
ancient13–40.0623%17 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0319%17 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0420%17 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0123%17 Sept
inferno13–90.0618%17 Sept
ancient16–140.0419%17 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0021%17 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0213%17 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0217%16 Sept
dust213–100.0026%16 Sept
dust216–14-0.0024%16 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0215%16 Sept
dust213–8-0.0212%16 Sept
dust29–13-0.0147%16 Sept
ancient13–80.0523%16 Sept
anubis13–90.0421%16 Sept
inferno13–50.0520%14 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0321%14 Sept
mirage13–50.0013%14 Sept
anubis13–40.1034%14 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0236%14 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0624%14 Sept
ancient11–130.0630%14 Sept
nuke13–30.0418%14 Sept
dust212–160.0721%14 Sept
mirage10–130.0118%13 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0327%13 Sept
dust213–8-0.0131%13 Sept
dust23–80.0115%13 Sept
dust213–110.0625%13 Sept
dust213–50.0728%13 Sept
dust213–90.0724%13 Sept
nuke6–2-0.0640%13 Sept
inferno7–90.0419%13 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0224%11 Sept
ancient10–130.0030%11 Sept
nuke13–90.0824%11 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0239%11 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0321%9 Sept
anubis13–100.0121%9 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0123%9 Sept
dust29–130.0027%7 Sept
inferno13–30.0221%7 Sept
dust213–9-0.0334%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0426%7 Sept
dust213–4-0.0412%7 Sept
inferno16–130.0123%7 Sept
inferno9–130.0420%7 Sept
ancient13–80.0718%7 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0616%6 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0117%6 Sept
ancient13–50.1423%6 Sept
dust210–13-0.0525%6 Sept
inferno13–80.0118%5 Sept
ancient12–160.0014%5 Sept
anubis13–80.0214%3 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0121%3 Sept
dust28–13-0.0921%3 Sept
cache7–13-0.0622%3 Sept
ancient16–140.1226%3 Sept
dust213–80.0218%3 Sept
dust210–130.0433%3 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0223%3 Sept
dust213–30.0221%2 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0117%2 Sept
dust25–13-0.0616%2 Sept
ancient0–11-0.088%2 Sept
ancient13–50.0417%1 Sept
inferno13–30.0826%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0130%1 Sept
ancient13–70.0423%1 Sept
nuke13–90.0726%1 Sept
inferno13–100.0419%1 Sept
anubis5–130.0324%1 Sept
nuke13–60.0241%1 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0111%1 Sept
inferno13–110.0129%1 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0328%1 Sept
anubis0–13-0.1233%31 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0633%31 Aug
mirage8–130.0422%31 Aug
anubis13–60.0518%31 Aug
dust213–100.0520%31 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0315%31 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0712%31 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0117%31 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0432%30 Aug
cache13–90.0526%30 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0214%30 Aug
mirage13–110.0222%30 Aug
dust216–14-0.0419%30 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0121%26 Aug
dust213–70.0623%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0821%26 Aug
ancient8–130.0128%26 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →