M4⁧⁧⁧⁧⁧⁧🐈‍⬛

M4⁧⁧⁧⁧⁧⁧🐈‍⬛ — CS2 Stats

76561198284209040[U:1:323943312]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,802Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,170 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,802 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 30 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

2,170Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-01-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,170
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 330 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGM4⁧⁧⁧⁧⁧⁧🐈‍⬛FACEITLevel 10 · 2,170 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,170csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateLWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 736ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time587ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy24.4%−5.9%
first ⅓ avg 30.2% → last ⅓ avg 24.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 15 May
70%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 24 Mar
367msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 11 May
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 16 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
1312In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 20nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27141352%0.01
dust2A2011955%0.01
infernoS2014670%0.02
anubisA106460%0.04
nukeD72529%-0.02
cacheA74357%0.05
ancientA74357%0.03
overpass2020%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,156Matches
51%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
78.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10144%1.4118.3
Ancient8961%1.3816.1
Dust25351%1.1615.5
Inferno5353%1.1917.2
Anubis4356%1.2717.5
Nuke3743%1.1917.9
Vertigo2850%1.3217.7
Overpass450%1.3622.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
575msReaction time
20.0%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
7.91HE damage / grenade
18.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.0377% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0716%25 Jul
dust213–40.1135%24 Jul
dust24–130.0319%24 Jul
dust25–40.0653%24 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0426%23 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0128%5 Jul
mirage19–170.0627%4 Jul
mirage14–160.0117%3 Jul
dust24–13-0.0224%3 Jul
mirage3–130.1226%3 Jul
dust213–90.0436%3 Jul
nuke10–130.0829%30 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0415%30 Jun
cache13–30.0420%30 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0424%29 Jun
anubis13–40.0826%29 Jun
ancient13–40.0838%29 Jun
mirage13–40.0230%28 Jun
inferno13–60.0232%28 Jun
overpass3–13-0.0722%11 Jun
nuke22–25-0.0316%11 Jun
dust26–13-0.0344%10 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0239%8 Jun
inferno13–110.0321%8 Jun
dust216–140.0023%28 May
inferno13–100.0320%23 May
inferno14–16-0.0520%23 May
nuke13–10-0.0111%23 May
inferno10–130.0013%23 May
ancient17–19-0.0019%23 May
anubis9–13-0.043%22 May
dust24–13-0.0410%22 May
ancient9–130.0721%21 May
dust213–110.0523%20 May
mirage15–19-0.0629%19 May
mirage14–16-0.0427%18 May
dust216–140.0923%17 May
inferno13–70.019%17 May
mirage6–13-0.0511%17 May
cache13–40.1233%16 May
anubis13–00.0850%16 May
ancient13–6-0.0128%16 May
inferno5–13-0.0343%16 May
cache7–130.0549%15 May
cache13–100.1037%15 May
cache4–13-0.0144%15 May
overpass9–130.1149%15 May
mirage13–30.1050%15 May
inferno13–70.1864%15 May
inferno17–190.1027%14 May
cache13–110.0620%12 May
inferno16–130.0717%12 May
mirage9–13-0.0420%12 May
ancient11–13-0.0311%12 May
inferno1–13-0.0614%12 May
mirage19–15-0.0016%11 May
dust27–13-0.0312%11 May
inferno13–9-0.0118%10 May
mirage16–140.0617%9 May
dust214–160.0716%9 May
mirage13–110.0420%8 May
inferno13–100.0929%7 May
ancient13–100.0332%7 May
anubis14–160.0412%3 May
inferno13–60.0214%2 May
dust213–20.0727%2 May
mirage13–10.0132%2 May
mirage14–16-0.0520%2 May
mirage13–30.0454%1 May
mirage13–10-0.0225%1 May
inferno6–130.0528%1 May
inferno13–90.0720%30 Apr
cache3–13-0.0024%28 Apr
anubis10–130.0216%27 Apr
dust28–13-0.0218%27 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0813%24 Apr
mirage13–70.0921%24 Apr
dust213–3-0.0132%24 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0332%23 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0214%23 Apr
nuke0–13-0.0769%23 Apr
ancient13–90.0728%23 Apr
mirage13–50.0150%21 Apr
anubis13–50.1022%19 Apr
dust216–14-0.0224%19 Apr
nuke16–19-0.0422%19 Apr
dust213–30.0522%17 Apr
mirage15–150.0323%3 Apr
anubis13–70.0264%24 Mar
anubis3–130.0942%24 Mar
mirage13–90.1470%24 Mar
dust211–13-0.0818%22 Mar
mirage10–130.0216%17 Feb
anubis13–40.0529%17 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0728%11 Feb
inferno13–80.0145%10 Feb
mirage13–10.0250%10 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0217%30 Jan
mirage10–130.0120%30 Jan
dust213–40.0122%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →