Silty — CS2 Stats

US76561198283506475[U:1:323240747]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,272Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,613Purple band · top ~10% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning54

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.7

Aggression5.6

Utility5.4

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch6.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning5.4

Utility5.4

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time578ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms

Headshot accuracy22.1%+6.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — italy 13–11

13–1Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 11dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.02
inferno	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.01
cache	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.00
anubis	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.00
nuke	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
ancient	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.02
dust2	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.05
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
italy	—	1	1–0	100%	0.18
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00
warden	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

265Matches

50%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

75.0ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

54%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	46	57%	1.01	14.9
Anubis	25	64%	1.26	17.6
Inferno	19	42%	0.81	14.8
Nuke	16	31%	0.90	15.6
Ancient	12	50%	0.98	14.8
Cache	10	60%	1.12	13.6
Dust2	10	50%	1.17	16.4
Train	5	40%	1.07	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.1%Spray accuracy

82.3%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

578msReaction time

31.4%T opening success

46.5%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

11.5%Flash assists

8.01HE damage / grenade

5.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.4082% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	20–22	-0.04	18%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.05	18%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	24%	19 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	15%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	23%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.04	22%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	19%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	19%	11 Aug →
nuke	1–13	-0.08	19%	11 Aug →
inferno	3–1	-0.04	67%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	14%	10 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	24%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	16%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	22%	7 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	37%	7 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	24%	4 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.04	18%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	29%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.03	33%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.09	19%	1 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	12%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	24%	29 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	0.06	27%	29 Jul →
office	13–8	-0.03	28%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.05	19%	28 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.01	18%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.08	24%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.11	23%	28 Jul →
ancient	3–13	0.03	16%	28 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.06	15%	27 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	11%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	28%	27 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	19%	26 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.09	17%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.05	30%	25 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	24%	25 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.02	20%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.06	39%	22 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	19%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.05	21%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	27%	20 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.06	25%	20 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.03	17%	20 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	16%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.06	31%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	16%	18 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.12	28%	17 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.03	16%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	26%	17 Jul →
cache	1–13	0.02	26%	16 Jul →
italy	13–11	0.18	30%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.04	20%	15 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.03	23%	15 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	16%	15 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	11%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	16%	15 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	27%	14 Jul →
inferno	6–2	0.07	40%	14 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	25%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	16%	14 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	21%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.05	22%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	18%	13 Jul →
shelter	11–13	0.00	19%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	21%	11 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	23%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.07	8%	10 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	15%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	22%	9 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	11%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	43%	7 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	20%	7 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	11%	6 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.01	6%	6 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	9%	3 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.09	12%	3 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	27%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.01	21%	2 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	11%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.06	25%	1 Jul →
warden	6–13	0.04	23%	29 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	17%	29 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	20%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	20%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	12%	27 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	13%	26 Jun →
cache	3–13	0.04	11%	23 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.10	3%	23 Jun →
overpass	4–13	-0.03	13%	21 Jun →
ancient	14–16	-0.03	13%	21 Jun →
cache	13–2	-0.03	16%	13 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.03	12%	10 Jun →
mirage	22–20	-0.05	8%	10 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	11%	9 Jun →
cache	16–14	-0.00	17%	9 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.01	13%	9 Jun →